Bisset L, Paungmali A, Vicenzino B, Beller E
Division of Physiotherapy, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2005 Jul;39(7):411-22; discussion 411-22. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.016170.
A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia (tennis elbow) was carried out. Seventy six randomised controlled trials were identified, 28 of which satisfied the minimum criteria for meta-analysis. The evidence suggests that extracorporeal shock wave therapy is not beneficial in the treatment of tennis elbow. There is a lack of evidence for the long term benefit of physical interventions in general. However, further research with long term follow up into manipulation and exercise as treatments is indicated.
对物理干预治疗外侧上髁炎(网球肘)有效性的文献进行了系统综述。共识别出76项随机对照试验,其中28项满足荟萃分析的最低标准。证据表明,体外冲击波疗法对网球肘治疗无益处。总体而言,缺乏物理干预长期益处的证据。然而,表明需要对作为治疗方法的手法治疗和运动进行长期随访的进一步研究。