Suppr超能文献

在深吸气屏气(DIBH)的全乳放疗中使用AlignRT和Catalyst™:是否仍需要影像引导放疗(IGRT)?

AlignRT and Catalyst™ in whole-breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?

作者信息

Laaksomaa Marko, Sarudis Sebastian, Rossi Maija, Lehtonen Turkka, Pehkonen Jani, Remes Jenny, Luukkanen Helmi, Skyttä Tanja, Kapanen Mika

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Department of Medical Physics, Länssjukhuset Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Mar;20(3):97-104. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12553.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is reported as a feasible setup technique for whole-breast radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH), but position errors of bony structures related to deeper parts of the target are not fully known. The aim of this study was to estimate patient setup accuracy and margins obtained with two different SGRT workflows with and without daily kV- and/or MV-based image guidance (IGRT).

METHODS

A total of 50 breast cancer patients were treated in DIBH, using SGRT for the patient setup, and IGRT for isocenter corrections. The patients were treated at two different departments, one using AlignRT (25 patients) and the other using Catalyst™ (25 patients). Inter-fractional position errors were analyzed retrospectively in orthogonal and tangential setup images, and analyzed with and without IGRT.

RESULTS

In the orthogonal kV-kV images, the systematic residual errors of the bony structures were ≤ 3 mm in both groups with SGRT-only. When fine-adjusted by daily IGRT, the errors decreased to ≤ 2 mm; except for the shoulder joint. The residual errors of the ribs in tangential images were between 1 and 2 mm with both workflows. The heart planning margins were between 3 and 7 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of IGRT may be considerably reduced with a well-planned SGRT-workflow for whole-breast DIBH with residual errors ≤ 3 mm. This accuracy can be further improved with an IGRT scheme.

摘要

目的

表面引导放疗(SGRT)被报道为一种在深吸气屏气(DIBH)下进行全乳放疗的可行摆位技术,但与靶区深部相关的骨结构位置误差尚不完全清楚。本研究的目的是评估采用两种不同的SGRT工作流程,在有和没有基于每日千伏和/或兆伏的图像引导(IGRT)情况下的患者摆位准确性和边界。

方法

共有50例乳腺癌患者在DIBH状态下接受治疗,使用SGRT进行患者摆位,并使用IGRT进行等中心校正。患者在两个不同科室接受治疗,一个科室使用AlignRT(25例患者),另一个科室使用Catalyst™(25例患者)。回顾性分析正交和切线摆位图像中的分次间位置误差,并分析有无IGRT的情况。

结果

在正交千伏-千伏图像中,仅使用SGRT的两组中骨结构的系统残余误差均≤3 mm。当通过每日IGRT进行微调时,误差降至≤2 mm;肩关节除外。两种工作流程下切线图像中肋骨的残余误差在1至2 mm之间。心脏计划边界在3至7 mm之间。

结论

对于全乳DIBH,通过精心规划的SGRT工作流程,残余误差≤3 mm时,IGRT的频率可能会大幅降低。采用IGRT方案可进一步提高这种准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e392/6414178/5552e5d698b8/ACM2-20-97-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验