Laaksomaa Marko, Aula Antti, Sarudis Sebastian, Keyriläinen Jani, Ahlroth Jenni, Murtola Anna, Pynnönen Kiira, Lehtonen Turkka, Björkqvist Mikko, Järvinen Lauri, Rossi Maija
Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Department of Medical Physics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024 Jun 6;29(2):176-186. doi: 10.5603/rpor.99673. eCollection 2024.
Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique are recommended for locoregional RT of breast cancer. The optimal workflow for a combination of surface-guided RT (SGRT) with DIBH technique is of current clinical interest.
The setup accuracy at three hospitals was evaluated using different SGRT workflows. A total of 150 patients (2269 image pairs) were analyzed in three groups: patient setup with the AlignRT® SGRT system in Tampere (Site 1, n = 50), the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Turku (Site 2, n = 50) and the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Jönköping (Site 3, n = 50). Each site used their routine workflow with SGRT-based setup and IGRT positioning. Residual errors of the bony chest wall, thoracic vertebra (Th 1) and humeral head were evaluated using IGRT images.
Systematic residual errors in the cranio-caudal (CC) direction and in pitch were generally larger at Site 2 than those at Sites 1 and 3 (p = 0.01-0.7). With daily IGRT, only a small difference (p = 0.01-0.9) was observed in residual random errors of bony structures in other directions between sites.
The introduction of SGRT and the use of daily IGRT lead to small residual errors when combining the best workflow practices from different hospitals. Our multicenter evaluation led to improved workflow by tightening the SGRT tolerances on Site 2 and fixation modification. Because of mainly small random errors, systematic posture errors in the images need to be corrected after posture correction with new setup surfaces. We recommend tight SGRT tolerances, good fixation and correction of systematic errors.
每日图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)和深吸气屏气(DIBH)技术被推荐用于乳腺癌的局部区域放疗。表面引导放疗(SGRT)与DIBH技术相结合的最佳工作流程是当前临床关注的焦点。
使用不同的SGRT工作流程评估了三家医院的摆位精度。共150例患者(2269对图像)被分为三组进行分析:在坦佩雷使用AlignRT® SGRT系统进行患者摆位(第1组,n = 50)、在图尔库使用Catalyst™ SGRT系统(第2组,n = 50)以及在延雪平使用Catalyst™ SGRT系统(第3组,n = 50)。每个站点都采用基于SGRT的摆位和IGRT定位的常规工作流程。使用IGRT图像评估胸壁、胸椎(Th 1)和肱骨头的残余误差。
第2组在头脚(CC)方向和俯仰方向的系统残余误差通常比第1组和第3组大(p = 0.01 - 0.7)。在每日IGRT情况下,各站点之间在其他方向的骨结构残余随机误差仅观察到微小差异(p = 0.01 - 0.9)。
引入SGRT并结合每日IGRT,同时采用不同医院的最佳工作流程实践时,会产生较小的残余误差。我们的多中心评估通过收紧第2组的SGRT公差和固定方式改进,从而改善了工作流程。由于主要是微小的随机误差,在使用新的摆位表面进行姿势校正后,图像中的系统姿势误差仍需校正。我们建议采用严格的SGRT公差、良好的固定方式并校正系统误差。