• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recruiting and Retaining People With Disabilities for Qualitative Health Research: Challenges and Solutions.招募和留住残疾人士参与定性健康研究:挑战与解决方案。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(7):1056-1064. doi: 10.1177/1049732319833361. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
2
Instructing to Impact: Exploration of Doctor of Physical Therapy Education Instruction of Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity for People With Disabilities.从指令到影响:物理治疗博士教育中关于残疾人士健康的社会决定因素和健康公平性教学的探索。
Phys Ther. 2024 Sep 4;104(9). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae070.
3
Health care access and quality for persons with disability: Patient and provider recommendations.残疾人的医疗保健可及性和质量:患者和提供者的建议。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Jul;11(3):382-389. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
4
Equity of African American Men in Headache in the United States: A Perspective From African American Headache Medicine Specialists (Part 1).美国非裔美国男性头痛中的公平问题:非裔美国头痛医学专家的观点(第 1 部分)。
Headache. 2020 Nov;60(10):2473-2485. doi: 10.1111/head.14004. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
5
Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review.残疾人在癌症护理方面是否存在差异?系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 13;18(12):e0285146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285146. eCollection 2023.
6
Improving medicines management for people with dementia in primary care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals to develop a theory-informed intervention.改善初级保健中痴呆症患者的药物管理:一项针对医疗保健专业人员的定性研究,旨在制定一项基于理论的干预措施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4971-7.
7
The intersection of disability and healthcare disparities: a conceptual framework.残疾与医疗保健差距的交叉点:一个概念框架。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):632-41. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.938176. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
"But what do you really think?" Nurses' contrasting explicit and implicit attitudes towards people with disabilities using the implicit association test.但你真正的想法是什么?护士使用内隐联想测验对残疾人的显性和隐性态度对比。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Nov;33(11):4342-4353. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17097. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
9
Suggested solutions to barriers in accessing healthcare by persons with disability in Uganda: a qualitative study.乌干达残疾人获得医疗保健障碍的解决方案建议:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 31;24(1):1010. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11448-4.
10
A Scholarship of Practice Revisited: Creating Community-Engaged Occupational Therapy Practitioners, Educators, and Scholars.再探实践奖学金:培养参与社区的职业治疗从业者、教育工作者和学者。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2015;29(4):352-69. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2015.1051690. Epub 2015 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental Experiences of Quality of Life When Caring for Their Children With Intellectual Disability: A Meta-Aggregation Systematic Review.照顾智障儿童的父母的生活质量体验:一项元聚合系统评价。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jan;38(1):e70005. doi: 10.1111/jar.70005.
2
Partnered Recruitment: Engaging Individuals With Lived Experience in the Recruitment of Co-Design Participants.合作伙伴招募:让具有亲身经验的个人参与共同设计参与者的招募。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14131. doi: 10.1111/hex.14131.
3
Challenges and best practices for recruiting families of children with intellectual disabilities for health research.招募智障儿童家庭参与健康研究的挑战与最佳实践
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 May 16;29(3):17446295241255178. doi: 10.1177/17446295241255178.
4
"I'm dealing with a health care system that doesn't get it": Barriers and facilitators to inclusive healthcare for autistic adults.“我正在应对一个不理解我的医疗体系”:为自闭症成年人提供包容的医疗保健的障碍和促进因素。
Autism. 2024 Jun;28(6):1382-1393. doi: 10.1177/13623613241236380. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
Diversity, equity, and inclusivity in observational ambulatory assessment: Recommendations from two decades of Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR) research.观察性门诊评估中的多样性、公平性和包容性:电子激活记录器 (EAR) 研究二十年的建议。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3207-3225. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02293-0. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
6
"Their Happiness, Not Neurotypical Success": Autistic Adults Reflect on the Parenting of Autistic Children.“他们的幸福,而非典型神经发育的成功”:成年自闭症患者反思对自闭症子女的养育
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jan;55(1):339-352. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-06188-z. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
7
Supporting disabled parents and their families: perspectives and recommendations from parents, attorneys, and child welfare professionals.支持残疾父母及其家庭:来自父母、律师和儿童福利专业人员的观点与建议。
J Public Child Welf. 2020;15(5):529. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2020.1751771.
8
Participant Characteristics as Moderators of the Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Interventions on Concerns About Falling: Secondary Analyses of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.参与者特征作为认知行为干预对跌倒担忧影响的调节因素:两项随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Aug;42(8):1877-1887. doi: 10.1177/07334648231165904. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
9
Barriers and facilitators to the recruitment of disabled people to clinical trials: a scoping review.将残疾人招募到临床试验中的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
Trials. 2023 Mar 8;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07142-1.
10
Inclusion of hearing and vision impairments in cognitive training interventions.在认知训练干预措施中纳入听力和视力障碍因素。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023 Feb 20;9(1):e12374. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12374. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaf Qualitative Health Research: Leveraging Technology to Conduct Linguistically and Sociopolitically Appropriate Methods of Inquiry.聋人定性健康研究:利用技术开展语言和社会政治上合适的探究方法。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Sep;28(11):1813-1824. doi: 10.1177/1049732318779050. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.心理学中定性原始研究、定性元分析研究和混合方法研究的期刊文章报告标准:APA 出版和传播委员会工作组报告。
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):26-46. doi: 10.1037/amp0000151.
3
Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities.日常参与的环境障碍与支持:来自残疾人的质性内部视角
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4):578-88. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.008.
4
"You can't be cold and scientific": community views on ethical issues in intellectual disability research.“你不能冷漠且只讲科学”:社区对智力残疾研究中伦理问题的看法
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):196-208. doi: 10.1177/1556264615575512. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
5
People with disabilities in the United States.美国的残疾人。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):771-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
6
Doing Research Together: A Study on the Views of Advisors with Intellectual Disabilities and Non-Disabled Researchers Collaborating in Research.共同开展研究:一项关于智障顾问与非残疾研究人员合作开展研究观点的研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2016 Mar;29(2):146-59. doi: 10.1111/jar.12165. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
7
Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population.残疾人作为一个未被认识到的健康差异人群。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S198-206. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302182. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Participatory research, people with intellectual disabilities and ethical approval: making reasonable adjustments to enable participation.参与式研究、智障人士与伦理批准:做出合理调整以促进参与
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Feb;24(3-4):573-81. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12702. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
9
Ethics, "Vulnerability," and Feminist Participatory Action Research With a Disability Community.伦理、“脆弱性”与针对残障群体的女性主义参与式行动研究
Qual Health Res. 2014 Jul;24(7):997-1005. doi: 10.1177/1049732314538122. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
Identifying the key concerns of Irish persons with intellectual disability.识别爱尔兰智障人士的主要担忧。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Nov;27(6):564-75. doi: 10.1111/jar.12099. Epub 2014 May 22.

招募和留住残疾人士参与定性健康研究:挑战与解决方案。

Recruiting and Retaining People With Disabilities for Qualitative Health Research: Challenges and Solutions.

机构信息

1 Northeastern Illinois University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

2 The University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(7):1056-1064. doi: 10.1177/1049732319833361. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1177/1049732319833361
PMID:30862260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11487479/
Abstract

There are 56.7 million people with disabilities (PWD) living in the United States; yet, PWD are significantly underrepresented in health research. Even when researchers purposively seek to include PWD in studies, challenges emerge related to recruitment and retention, leading to inadequate representation and surface understandings of this population. This in turn contributes to the perpetuation of implicit and explicit health disparities that are already experienced by this population. Grounded within a qualitative, community-based participatory health research framework, we highlight challenges associated with recruiting and retaining PWD in health research, including a critical analysis of the research enterprise structure, how this disables accessible research practices for PWD, and leads to continued skepticism among PWD regarding the value of participating in research. Finally, we propose solutions to create and maintain a culture of access and inclusion as well as long-term collaborative and equity-focused partnerships.

摘要

美国有 5670 万残疾人(PWD);然而,残疾人在健康研究中代表性严重不足。即使研究人员有意将残疾人纳入研究,也会在招募和保留方面遇到挑战,导致代表性不足,对这一人群的理解浮于表面。这反过来又加剧了已经存在于这一人群中的隐性和显性健康差距。本研究基于定性的、以社区为基础的参与式健康研究框架,强调了在健康研究中招募和保留残疾人所面临的挑战,包括对研究企业结构的批判性分析,这如何使残疾人无法获得可及的研究实践,并导致残疾人对参与研究的价值持续持怀疑态度。最后,我们提出了一些解决方案,以创造和维持一种无障碍和包容的文化,以及长期的合作和以公平为重点的伙伴关系。