支持残疾父母及其家庭：来自父母、律师和儿童福利专业人员的观点与建议。
Supporting disabled parents and their families: perspectives and recommendations from parents, attorneys, and child welfare professionals.
作者信息
Albert Sasha M, Powell Robyn M
机构信息
The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
出版信息
J Public Child Welf. 2020;15(5):529. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2020.1751771.
Abstract
While it is well-established that parents with disabilities and their families are over-represented in the child welfare system, no known research has described the parents,' child welfare professionals,' and attorneys' perspectives on the system's capacity to support them or their recommendations for improvement. This qualitative phenomenological study involved semi-structured interviews with 15 disabled parents, 15 child welfare professionals, and 15 parent attorneys. Respondents agreed that the child welfare system lacks expertise on disability and adequate services for disabled parents, and holds negative attitudes about them. Respondents recommended robust training for professionals on parents with disabilities, and individually-tailored services for disabled parents.
摘要
虽然残疾父母及其家庭在儿童福利系统中的占比过高已是公认的事实，但尚无已知研究描述父母、儿童福利专业人员和律师对该系统支持他们的能力的看法或他们的改进建议。这项定性现象学研究包括对15名残疾父母、15名儿童福利专业人员和15名父母律师进行半结构化访谈。受访者一致认为，儿童福利系统缺乏关于残疾的专业知识，为残疾父母提供的服务不足，并且对他们持有负面态度。受访者建议为专业人员提供关于残疾父母的强化培训，并为残疾父母提供个性化服务。
相似文献
1
Supporting disabled parents and their families: perspectives and recommendations from parents, attorneys, and child welfare professionals.支持残疾父母及其家庭：来自父母、律师和儿童福利专业人员的观点与建议。
J Public Child Welf. 2020;15(5):529. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2020.1751771.
2
Barriers and Solutions to Passing State Legislation to Protect the Rights of Parents With Disabilities: Lessons From Interviews With Advocates, Attorneys, and Legislators.通过州立法保护残疾父母权利的障碍与解决方案：来自倡导者、律师和立法者访谈的经验教训
J Disabil Policy Stud. 2021;33:15-24. doi: 10.1177/10442073211006394.
3
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求：对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
4
Issues in statutory rape law enforcement: the views of district attorneys in Kansas.法定强奸罪执法中的问题：堪萨斯州地方检察官的观点
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Jul-Aug;30(4):177-81.
5
Exploring professionals' practices and perspectives on supporting parents with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study.探索专业人员在支持智障父母方面的实践与观点：一项定性研究。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 May 30;4:1153570. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1153570. eCollection 2023.
6
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.
7
Children with disabilities in the child protective services system: an analog study of investigation and case management.儿童保护服务系统中的残疾儿童：一项关于调查与案件管理的模拟研究
Child Abuse Negl. 2009 Apr;33(4):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.10.001.
8
Education and healthcare services for children and young people with intellectual disability in Vietnam: an ecological systems analysis.越南智障儿童和青少年的教育与医疗服务：生态系统分析
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Apr;47(8):2084-2096. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2390664. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
9
Becoming a client of the Danish social service system increases stress in parents of disabled infants.成为丹麦社会服务系统的客户会增加残疾婴儿父母的压力。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Jun;58(6):A4270.
10
Mandatory reporting for child protection in health settings and the rights of parents with disabilities.医疗机构中儿童保护的强制报告与残疾父母的权利。
Disabil Health J. 2017 Apr;10(2):165-168. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
引用本文的文献
1
Experiences with and Perceptions of the Child Welfare System During the Perinatal Period of Mothers with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.智力和发育障碍母亲围产期儿童福利系统的经历与认知
J Public Child Welf. 2025;19(4):751-773. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2024.2362685. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
A qualitative meta-synthesis of the perinatal healthcare experiences of people with disability.对残疾人士围产期医疗保健经历的定性元分析。
Disabil Health J. 2025 Jul;18(3):101828. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101828. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
3
'I Don't Think I Have Ever Worked Harder on a Case': Needs of Canadian Child Protection Workers and Parents With Intellectual Disabilities.“我认为我在一个案子上从未如此努力工作过”：加拿大儿童保护工作者和智障父母的需求
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jan;38(1):e70006. doi: 10.1111/jar.70006.
4
"They helped me stand on my own two feet": Canadian parents with intellectual disabilities in child protection.“他们帮助我自立”：儿童保护领域中患有智力残疾的加拿大父母。
J Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jun;29(2):349-370. doi: 10.1177/17446295241296215. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Grappling with Issues of Motherhood for Women with Schizophrenia.精神分裂症女性面临的母亲身份问题
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 2;11(21):2882. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212882.
6
Barriers and Solutions to Passing State Legislation to Protect the Rights of Parents With Disabilities: Lessons From Interviews With Advocates, Attorneys, and Legislators.通过州立法保护残疾父母权利的障碍与解决方案：来自倡导者、律师和立法者访谈的经验教训
J Disabil Policy Stud. 2021;33:15-24. doi: 10.1177/10442073211006394.
7
Child Protection, Disability and Obstetric Violence: Three Case Studies from Iceland.儿童保护、残疾和产科暴力：来自冰岛的三个案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 28;18(1):158. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010158.
本文引用的文献
1
Trajectories of Economic Disconnection among Families in the Child Welfare System.儿童福利系统中家庭经济脱节的轨迹。
Soc Probl. 2016 May;63(2):161-179. doi: 10.1093/socpro/spw006. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
2
Social worker perception of grandparent involvement where a parent has an intellectual disability.社会工作者对父母一方有智力残疾的祖孙参与的看法。
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Sep;92:103427. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103427. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
3
Recruiting and Retaining People With Disabilities for Qualitative Health Research: Challenges and Solutions.招募和留住残疾人士参与定性健康研究：挑战与解决方案。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(7):1056-1064. doi: 10.1177/1049732319833361. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Child Protective Service Disparities and Serious Mental Illnesses: Results From a National Survey.儿童保护服务差异与严重精神疾病：一项全国性调查的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Mar 1;70(3):202-208. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800277. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
Disparities in Child Protective Services: Commentary on Kaplan et al. (2019).儿童保护服务中的差异：对卡普兰等人（2019年）的评论
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Mar 1;70(3):209-210. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900027.
6
#SaytheWord: A disability culture commentary on the erasure of "disability".#言说残疾：论“残疾”的被抹去——一种残疾文化评论
Rehabil Psychol. 2019 May;64(2):111-118. doi: 10.1037/rep0000258. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
A systematic scoping review of parental satisfaction with child protection services.关于父母对儿童保护服务满意度的系统综述。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Feb;66:141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Health of US parents with and without disabilities.美国残疾和非残疾父母的健康状况。
Disabil Health J. 2017 Apr;10(2):303-307. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
9
Child protection services and parents with intellectual and developmental disabilities.儿童保护服务与智力和发育障碍的父母。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017 May;30(3):521-532. doi: 10.1111/jar.12323. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
10
Judicial Reliance on Parental IQ in Appellate-Level Child Welfare Cases Involving Parents with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.在涉及有智力和发育障碍父母的上诉级儿童福利案件中，司法对父母智商的依赖
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2017 May;30(3):553-562. doi: 10.1111/jar.12296. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
Zotero 插件