Suppr超能文献

血流限制训练对止血的影响:一项关于随机和非随机试验的系统评价

Effects of blood flow restriction exercise on hemostasis: a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized trials.

作者信息

Nascimento Dahan da Cunha, Petriz Bernardo, Oliveira Samuel da Cunha, Vieira Denis Cesar Leite, Funghetto Silvana Schwerz, Silva Alessandro Oliveira, Prestes Jonato

机构信息

Graduate Program in Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia (UCB), Brasilia, Brazil,

Department of Physical Education, University Center of the Federal District (UDF), Brasilia, Brazil,

出版信息

Int J Gen Med. 2019 Feb 12;12:91-100. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S194883. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise has shown to induce a positive influence on bone metabolism and attenuate muscle strength loss and atrophy in subjects suffering from musculoskeletal weakness. Despite the known benefits of BFR exercise, it remains unclear whether or not the pressurization of blood vessels damages the endothelial cells or increases risk for formation of thrombi. Thus, the effects of BFR exercise on coagulation, fibrinolysis, or hemostasis, remains speculative.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the short and long- term effects of BFR exercise on blood hemostasis in healthy individuals and patients with known disease (ie, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and ischemic heart disease).

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of English and non-English articles was conducted across PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases, including reference lists of relevant papers. Study quality assessment was evaluated using the modified version of Downs and Black checklist. Search results were limited to exercise training studies investigating the effects of BFR exercise on blood hemostasis in healthy individuals and patients with disease. Level of evidence was determined according to the criteria described by Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine.

STUDY SELECTION

Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) that examined the effects of exercise with BFR exercise vs exercises without BFR on blood hemostasis in healthy individuals and patients were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Nine studies were eligible (RCT =4; NRCT =5).

RESULTS

The average score on the Downs and Black checklist was 11.22. All studies were classified as having poor methodological quality wherein the level of evidence provided in all reviewed studies was level IIb only (ie, poor quality RCTs).

CONCLUSION

Considering the limitations in the available evidence, firm recommendations cannot be provided.

摘要

背景

血流限制(BFR)运动已显示出对骨骼代谢有积极影响,并能减轻肌肉骨骼虚弱患者的肌肉力量损失和萎缩。尽管BFR运动有已知的益处,但血管加压是否会损害内皮细胞或增加血栓形成风险仍不清楚。因此,BFR运动对凝血、纤维蛋白溶解或止血的影响仍具有推测性。

目的

本研究的目的是对BFR运动对健康个体和已知疾病(即高血压、糖尿病、肥胖症和缺血性心脏病)患者血液止血的短期和长期影响进行系统评价。

数据来源

对PubMed、Science Direct和谷歌学术数据库中的英文和非英文文章进行了系统评价,包括相关论文的参考文献列表。使用Downs和Black清单的修改版对研究质量进行评估。搜索结果仅限于调查BFR运动对健康个体和疾病患者血液止血影响的运动训练研究。证据水平根据牛津循证医学中心描述的标准确定。

研究选择

仅纳入了检查BFR运动与无BFR运动对健康个体和患者血液止血影响的随机对照试验(RCT)和非随机对照试验(NRCT)。

数据提取

九项研究符合条件(RCT = 4;NRCT = 5)。

结果

Downs和Black清单的平均得分为11.22。所有研究均被归类为方法学质量较差,其中所有综述研究提供的证据水平仅为IIb级(即质量较差的RCT)。

结论

考虑到现有证据的局限性,无法提供确凿的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91d/6388738/aadbec2eec6c/ijgm-12-091Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验