• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量自闭症谱系障碍儿童照顾者的健康溢出效应:EQ-5D-3L 和 SF-6D 的比较。

Measuring Health Spillover Effects in Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, Slot 820, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.

Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Apr;37(4):609-620. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00789-2.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-019-00789-2
PMID:30864066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6469595/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Healthcare interventions that improve the health of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have the potential to affect the health of caregivers. This study compares the three-level EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-3L) and the Short Form-6 Dimension (SF-6D) in their ability to value such spillover effects in caregivers.

METHODS

Clinical data collected from two Autism Treatment Network (ATN) sites was combined with survey data of caregivers of children diagnosed with ASD. Caregivers completed instruments by proxy describing child health and completed the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D preference-weighted instruments to describe their own health.

RESULTS

There was a strong correlation between the health utility scores of the two preference-weighted instruments (ρ = 0.6172, p < 0.001) measuring caregiver health-related quality of life. There was a similar correlation between both the SF-6D and EQ-5D-3L scores with a previously validated care-related quality of life measure (Care-related Quality of Life instrument [CarerQol-7D]) (ρ = 0.569, p < 0.001 and ρ = 0.541, p < 0.001, respectively). The mean SF-6D scores for caregivers differed significantly in relation to four of the five child health or behavior measures whereas the EQ-5D-3L differed for only two of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Health utility values of caregivers for children with ASD vary by the health characteristics of the child, suggesting significant potential for spillover effects. The comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D demonstrated that both instruments can be used to estimate spillover effects of interventions to improve child health, but the SF-6D exhibited greater sensitivity to child health among children with ASD.

摘要

背景和目的

改善自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童健康的医疗干预措施有可能影响照顾者的健康。本研究比较了三级欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-3L)和六维健康量表简表(SF-6D)在评估此类溢出效应方面的能力。

方法

将来自两个自闭症治疗网络(ATN)站点的临床数据与 ASD 儿童照顾者的调查数据相结合。照顾者通过代理完成描述儿童健康的工具,并完成 EQ-5D-3L 和 SF-6D 偏好加权工具来描述自己的健康状况。

结果

两种偏好加权工具(ρ=0.6172,p<0.001)测量照顾者健康相关生活质量的健康效用评分之间存在很强的相关性。SF-6D 和 EQ-5D-3L 评分与之前验证的与照顾相关的生活质量测量(照顾者生活质量工具[CarerQol-7D])之间也存在类似的相关性(ρ=0.569,p<0.001 和 ρ=0.541,p<0.001)。 caregiver 的平均 SF-6D 评分与儿童健康或行为的五个指标中的四个显著相关,而 EQ-5D-3L 仅与其中两个相关。

结论

ASD 儿童照顾者的健康效用值因儿童的健康特征而异,表明溢出效应存在重大潜力。EQ-5D-3L 和 SF-6D 的比较表明,两种工具都可用于估计改善儿童健康的干预措施的溢出效应,但 SF-6D 对 ASD 儿童的健康更敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f54/6469595/a7015ebd2278/40273_2019_789_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f54/6469595/a7015ebd2278/40273_2019_789_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f54/6469595/a7015ebd2278/40273_2019_789_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Health Spillover Effects in Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D.测量自闭症谱系障碍儿童照顾者的健康溢出效应:EQ-5D-3L 和 SF-6D 的比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Apr;37(4):609-620. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00789-2.
2
Comparison of EuroQol-5D-3L and Short Form-6D Utility Scores in Family Caregivers of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China.中文版 5 维健康量表(EuroQol-5D-3L)和简短形式 6 维度(EuroQol-5D-3L)效用评分在结直肠癌患者家庭照护者中的比较:中国的横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;9:742332. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.742332. eCollection 2021.
3
Psychometric performance of the CFQ-R-8D compared to the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in people with cystic fibrosis.CFQ-R-8D 与 EQ-5D-3L 和 SF-6D 在囊性纤维化患者中的心理测量性能比较。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Feb 28;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00697-w.
4
Are condition-specific utilities more valid than generic preference-based ones in asthma? Evidence from a study comparing EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D with AQL-5D.在哮喘中,特定疾病效用值是否比基于通用偏好的效用值更有效?一项比较EQ-5D-3L、SF-6D与AQL-5D的研究证据。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec;18(6):667-675. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1505506. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
5
VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF EQ-5D-3L AND SF-6D INSTRUMENTS IN A SPANISH PARKINSON´S DISEASE POPULATION SAMPLE.EQ-5D-3L量表和SF-6D量表在西班牙帕金森病患者样本中的效度验证与比较
Nutr Hosp. 2015 Dec 1;32(6):2808-21. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.32.6.9765.
6
Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.《腰痛患者欧洲五维健康量表 5 维度 5 水平版与六维度简短量表效用测量的差异心理测量学特性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):E679-E686. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002939.
7
Psychometric properties of the EuroQol Five Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) in caregivers of autistic children.《自闭症儿童照顾者的欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-3L)的心理测量特性》
Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2909-20. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0423-8. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
8
Comparison of the EQ-5D 3L and the SF-6D (SF-36) contemporaneous utility scores in patients with chronic kidney disease in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional survey.斯里兰卡慢性肾脏病患者 EQ-5D 3L 与 SF-6D(SF-36)同期效用评分比较:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e024854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024854.
9
EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.症状性良性甲状腺结节的 EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6D 效用测量:可接受性和心理测量评估。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):447-454. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0220-5.
10
Comparison of the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in the general population of Chengdu city in China.中国成都市普通人群中EQ-5D-3L与SF-6D心理测量特性的比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(11):e14719. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014719.

引用本文的文献

1
The Psychometric Performance of Generic Preference-Based Measures in Informal Carers: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies.通用偏好性测量工具在非正式照料者中的心理测量性能:验证研究的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01509-9.
2
The economic impact of caregiving for individuals with Angelman syndrome in the United States: results from a caregiver survey.美国照顾患有天使综合征个体的经济影响:一项照顾者调查结果
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Feb 21;20(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03551-4.
3
EQ-5D-5L or EQ-HWB-S: Which is the Better Instrument for Capturing Spillover Effects in Parental Carers of Children with COVID-19?

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of the Validity and Responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D for Measuring Health Spillovers: A Study of the Family Impact of Meningitis.EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6D 测量健康溢出效应的有效性和反应性比较:脑膜炎对家庭影响的研究。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Nov;37(8):882-893. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17706355. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Measuring Care-Related Quality of Life of Caregivers for Use in Economic Evaluations: CarerQol Tariffs for Australia, Germany, Sweden, UK, and US.用于经济评估的护理人员护理相关生活质量测量:澳大利亚、德国、瑞典、英国和美国的护理者生活质量量表
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Apr;35(4):469-478. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0477-x.
3
EQ-5D-5L还是EQ-HWB-S:哪种工具更适合捕捉新冠病毒感染儿童的父母照料者的溢出效应?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May;43(5):555-567. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01473-4. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Assessing the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-5L among informal caregivers of people with dementia.评估简易 5 维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)在痴呆患者非专业照护者中的心理测量性能。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):2693-2704. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03737-6. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Sleeping Sound Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Cost-Effectiveness of a Brief Behavioural Sleep Intervention in Primary School-Aged Autistic Children.睡眠良好自闭症谱系障碍(ASD):小学适龄自闭症儿童简短行为睡眠干预的成本效益
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06422-2.
6
Research trends in contemporary health economics: a scientometric analysis on collective content of specialty journals.当代卫生经济学研究趋势:对专业期刊集体内容的科学计量分析
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00471-6.
7
Comparative performance and mapping algorithms between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among the Chinese general population.中国一般人群中 EQ-5D-5L 与 SF-6Dv2 之间的比较性能和映射算法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Feb;25(1):7-19. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01566-x. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
8
Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost-effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review.针对智力残疾者干预措施的经济评估和成本效益分析的结果测量:方法学系统评价。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Mar;36(2):230-240. doi: 10.1111/jar.13056. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
Comparison of the measurement properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese population health survey.SF-6Dv2 和 EQ-5D-5L 在中国人群健康调查中的测量性能比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Jun 16;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02003-y.
10
A Personalized Multidisciplinary Approach to Evaluating and Treating Autism Spectrum Disorder.一种评估和治疗自闭症谱系障碍的个性化多学科方法。
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 14;12(3):464. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030464.
Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.
《健康与医疗领域成本效益分析的实施、方法学实践和报告推荐:第二版》。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316(10):1093-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195.
4
A Framework for Including Family Health Spillovers in Economic Evaluation.将家庭健康溢出效应纳入经济评估的框架。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Feb;36(2):176-86. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15605094. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
5
Treatment for Sleep Problems in Children with Autism and Caregiver Spillover Effects.自闭症儿童睡眠问题的治疗及对照顾者的溢出效应
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Nov;45(11):3613-23. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2507-5.
6
Progress in measuring family spillover effects for economic evaluations.经济评估中衡量家庭溢出效应的进展。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Apr;15(2):195-8. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.997216. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
7
Does including informal care in economic evaluations matter? A systematic review of inclusion and impact of informal care in cost-effectiveness studies.在经济评估中纳入非正式护理重要吗?对成本效益研究中非正式护理的纳入情况及其影响的系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Feb;33(2):123-35. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0218-y.
8
Measuring family HRQoL spillover effects using direct health utility assessment.使用直接健康效用评估来衡量家庭健康相关生活质量的溢出效应。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):81-93. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14541328. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
9
Variation in the spillover effects of illness on parents, spouses, and children of the chronically ill.疾病对慢性病患者的父母、配偶和子女的溢出效应的差异。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Apr;12(2):117-24. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0079-8.
10
Caring for a child with autism spectrum disorder and parents' quality of life: application of the CarerQol.照顾自闭症谱系障碍儿童和父母的生活质量:CarerQol 的应用。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Aug;44(8):1933-45. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2066-1.