• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Campus Alcohol Policies: Measuring Accessibility, Clarity, and Effectiveness.评估校园酒精政策:衡量可及性、清晰度和有效性。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;43(5):1007-1015. doi: 10.1111/acer.14017. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
2
Alcohol policies on college campuses.大学校园的酒精政策。
J Am Coll Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;53(4):149-57. doi: 10.3200/JACH.53.4.149-157.
3
Improving Campus Alcohol Policies Through Assessment and Scoring.通过评估和评分来改进校园酒精政策。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Mar;24(2):366-372. doi: 10.1177/15248399211056302. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
4
Self-reported campus alcohol policy and college alcohol consumption: a multilevel analysis of 4592 Korean students from 82 colleges.自我报告的校园酒精政策与大学生酒精消费:对来自 82 所高校的 4592 名韩国学生的多层次分析。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Feb 1;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-0255-9.
5
E-Cigarette Policies on College Campuses: Student Use Behaviors, Awareness, and Policy Support.大学校园的电子烟政策:学生使用行为、认知及政策支持
J Community Health. 2016 Dec;41(6):1110-1115. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0262-y.
6
Cigarette butts near building entrances: what is the impact of smoke-free college campus policies?建筑物入口处的烟头:无烟大学校园政策有何影响?
Tob Control. 2013 Mar;22(2):107-12. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050152. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
7
Students' drinking behavior and perceptions towards introducing alcohol policies on university campus in Denmark: a focus group study.丹麦大学生的饮酒行为及对大学校园引入酒精政策的看法:一项焦点小组研究
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2016 Apr 29;11(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13011-016-0060-7.
8
College student perceptions on campus alcohol policies and consumption patterns.大学生对校园酒精政策及消费模式的看法。
J Drug Educ. 2011;41(4):345-58. doi: 10.2190/DE.41.4.a.
9
Addressing College Drinking as a Statewide Public Health Problem: Key Findings From the Maryland Collaborative.将大学生饮酒问题作为全州范围的公共卫生问题加以应对:马里兰州合作项目的关键发现
Health Promot Pract. 2018 Mar;19(2):303-313. doi: 10.1177/1524839917711399. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
10
Impact of the adoption of tobacco-free campus policies on student enrollment at colleges and universities, North Carolina, 2001-2010.2001 - 2010年,北卡罗来纳州无烟校园政策的实施对高校学生入学率的影响。
J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(4):230-6. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1015023.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the implementation of evidence-based alcohol policies on Atlantic Canadian post-secondary campuses: A comparative analysis.评估基于证据的酒精政策在大西洋加拿大高校校园的实施情况:一项比较分析。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Oct;115(5):789-800. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00907-4. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Gender and sexual identity and harms from others' drinking among U.S. college students: Results from a multi-campus survey.美国大学生的性别和性认同以及他人饮酒造成的伤害:多校区调查结果。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Oct;72(7):1978-1982. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2112045. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
A Culture of Health and Alcohol-Permitted Events at a U.S. University.美国大学的健康文化和允许饮酒的活动。
J Prev (2022). 2022 Oct;43(5):605-622. doi: 10.1007/s10935-022-00686-z. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing College Drinking as a Statewide Public Health Problem: Key Findings From the Maryland Collaborative.将大学生饮酒问题作为全州范围的公共卫生问题加以应对:马里兰州合作项目的关键发现
Health Promot Pract. 2018 Mar;19(2):303-313. doi: 10.1177/1524839917711399. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
2
The Utility of Including the Strengths of Underage Drinking Laws in Determining Their Effect on Outcomes.纳入未成年饮酒法律的优势以确定其对结果影响的效用。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Aug;39(8):1528-37. doi: 10.1111/acer.12779. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
3
Scoring the Strengths and Weaknesses of Underage Drinking Laws in the United States.评估美国未成年人饮酒法律的优缺点
World Med Health Policy. 2015 Mar;7(1):28-58. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.132.
4
Alcohol consumption and site-specific cancer risk: a comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis.饮酒与特定部位癌症风险:一项全面的剂量反应荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Feb 3;112(3):580-93. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.579. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
5
Description and predictors of positive and negative alcohol-related consequences in the first year of college.描述和预测大学第一年中与酒精相关的积极和消极后果。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Jan;75(1):103-14. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.103.
6
The slope of change: an environmental management approach to reduce drinking on a day of celebration at a US college.变化的斜率:一种环境管理方法,以减少美国一所大学庆祝日的饮酒量。
J Am Coll Health. 2013;61(6):324-34. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.788008.
7
Impact of a randomized campus/community trial to prevent high-risk drinking among college students.一项针对大学生预防高危饮酒的随机校园/社区试验的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Oct;36(10):1767-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01786.x. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
8
Alcohol policies and practices among four-year colleges in the United States: prevalence and patterns.美国四年制高校中的酒精政策和实践:流行程度和模式。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 May;73(3):361-7. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.361.
9
An evaluation of college online alcohol-policy information: 2007 compared with 2002.大学在线酒精政策信息评估:2007年与2002年对比
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul(16):28-33. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.28.
10
Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005.1998 - 2005年美国18 - 24岁大学生中与酒精相关的死亡率和发病率的规模及趋势。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul(16):12-20. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.12.

评估校园酒精政策:衡量可及性、清晰度和有效性。

Assessing Campus Alcohol Policies: Measuring Accessibility, Clarity, and Effectiveness.

机构信息

Department of Health Law, Policy and Management , Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

National Opinion Research Center , University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;43(5):1007-1015. doi: 10.1111/acer.14017. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1111/acer.14017
PMID:30865305
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6502686/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Excessive alcohol consumption poses significant hazards to health and safety on college campuses. While substantial research exists regarding effective policies for preventing alcohol-related problems in the communities surrounding campuses, on-campus alcohol policies have received far less attention.

METHODS

Official campus alcohol policies (CAPs) were retrieved from the websites of the 15 member schools of the Maryland Collaborative to Reduce College Drinking and Related Problems, a voluntary statewide collaborative. CAPs were assessed for accessibility, clarity, and effectiveness. In addition to assessing whether campuses were in compliance with federal regulations for comprehensiveness of policies, a measure of likely policy effectiveness was developed through the use of 2 Delphi panels drawing on alcohol policy researchers and on-campus and community practitioners, respectively. The panels rated 35 potential policies and 13 possible sanctions; lists of policies and sanctions were compiled primarily from what was already in existence at 1 or more member schools.

RESULTS

For most campuses, the CAPs could be located within 30 seconds, but tended to be spread across multiple web pages. Language used to communicate the policies tended to be complex and above the reading level of someone with a high school education. At least half of the schools had less than half of the possible policies rated most or somewhat effective by the Delphi panels. Schools were more likely to employ the most effective sanctions, but somewhat and ineffective sanctions were also not uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

CAPs are an important element in reducing negative consequences of alcohol consumption on college campuses. A higher level of research scrutiny is warranted to understand the extent to which CAPs are associated with excessive drinking, but this research describes an evidence- and expert-informed assessment approach that colleges can use to regularly analyze and update their CAPS.

摘要

背景

过度饮酒对大学校园的健康和安全构成重大威胁。虽然大量研究涉及预防校园周边社区与酒精相关问题的有效政策,但校园内的酒精政策却受到的关注较少。

方法

从马里兰州减少大学生饮酒和相关问题合作组织的 15 个成员学校的网站上检索到官方校园酒精政策 (CAP)。评估 CAP 的可及性、清晰度和有效性。除了评估校园政策的全面性是否符合联邦法规外,还通过使用两个 Delphi 小组分别利用酒精政策研究人员和校园和社区从业者,制定了衡量政策有效性的措施。小组分别对 35 项潜在政策和 13 项可能的制裁措施进行了评估;政策和制裁措施清单主要来自一个或多个成员学校已经存在的内容。

结果

对于大多数校园来说,CAP 可以在 30 秒内找到,但往往分散在多个网页上。用于传达政策的语言往往复杂,超过了具有高中教育水平的人的阅读水平。至少有一半的学校,德尔菲小组认为最有效或最有效的政策不到一半。学校更有可能采用最有效的制裁措施,但也不乏有些和无效的制裁措施。

结论

CAP 是减少大学校园饮酒负面影响的重要因素。需要更高级别的研究审查来了解 CAP 与过度饮酒的程度相关,但这项研究描述了一种基于证据和专家意见的评估方法,学院可以用来定期分析和更新他们的 CAP。