Coetzee Ockert, Swartz Leslie, Capri Charlotte, Adnams Colleen
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, J-Block, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa.
Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 13;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3999-z.
Low- and middle-income countries often lack the fiscal, infrastructural and human resources to conduct evidence-based research; similar constraints may also hinder the application of good clinical practice guidelines based on research findings from high-income countries. While the context of health organizations is increasingly recognized as an important consideration when such guidelines are implemented, there is a paucity of studies that have considered local contexts of resource-scarcity against recommended clinical guidelines.
This paper sets out to explore the implementation of the NICE Guideline 11 on family interventions when working with persons with intellectual disability and challenging behavior by a group of psychologists employed in a government health facility in Cape Town, South Africa.
In the absence of evidence-based South African research, we argue that aspects of the guidelines, in particular those that informed our ethos and conceptual thinking, could be applied by clinical psychologists in a meaningful manner notwithstanding the relative scarcity of resources.
We have argued that where guidelines such as the NICE Guidelines do not apply contextually throughout, it remains important to retain the principles behind these guidelines in local contexts. Limitations of this study exist in that the data were drawn only from the clinical experience of authors. Some of the implications for future research in resource-constrained contexts such as ours are discussed. Smaller descriptive, qualitative studies are necessary to explore the contextual limitations and resource strengths that exist in low- and middle-income settings, and these studies should be more systematic than drawing only on the clinical experience of authors, as has been done in this study.
低收入和中等收入国家往往缺乏开展循证研究所需的财政、基础设施和人力资源;类似的限制因素也可能阻碍基于高收入国家研究结果的良好临床实践指南的应用。虽然在实施此类指南时,卫生组织的背景越来越被视为一个重要的考虑因素,但很少有研究考虑到资源稀缺的当地背景与推荐的临床指南之间的关系。
本文旨在探讨南非开普敦一家政府卫生机构的一组心理学家在与智障及具有挑战性行为的人合作时,实施英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)关于家庭干预的第11号指南的情况。
由于缺乏基于南非研究的证据,我们认为,尽管资源相对稀缺,但临床心理学家仍可切实应用该指南的某些方面,尤其是那些为我们的理念和概念性思维提供依据的方面。
我们认为,像NICE指南这样的指南若不能在所有情况下都适用,那么在当地背景下保留这些指南背后的原则仍然很重要。本研究存在局限性,因为数据仅来自作者的临床经验。文中讨论了在我们这样资源有限的背景下,对未来研究的一些启示。有必要开展规模较小的描述性定性研究,以探索低收入和中等收入环境中存在的背景限制和资源优势,而且这些研究应比本研究仅依据作者的临床经验更具系统性。