Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e022479. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022479.
Successful treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) relies on its rapid recognition. It is unclear whether the accepted presentation of chest pain applies to different ethnic groups. We thus examined potential ethnic variations in ACS symptoms and clinical care outcomes in white, South Asian and Chinese patients.
Cross-sectional survey.
Participants were hospitalised at 1 of 12 Canadian centres across four provinces.
1334 patients with ACS (630 white; 488 South Asian; 216 Chinese).
ACS presentation symptoms (classic/typical midsternal pain/discomfort with or without radiation to the left neck, shoulder or arm) were assessed by self-report. Clinical care outcomes (time to emergency room [ER] presentation, cardiac catheterisation; receipt of cardiac catheterisation, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) were obtained by health record audit.
The mean age of the sample was 62 years and 30% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The most common presenting symptom was midsternal pain/discomfort of any intensity regardless of ethnic status. Yet, a substantial proportion of patients reported atypical symptoms (33% white, 19% South Asian, 20% Chinese; p<0.006). After adjustment for age, sex, education, current smoking, extent of coronary artery disease, presence of diabetes or chronic kidney disease and STEMI vs non-STEMI/unstable angina, South Asians were more likely to present with at least moderate intensity midsternal pain/discomfort (adjusted OR [AOR] 1.44; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.98), whereas Chinese were less likely to present with radiating symptoms (AOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.74) compared with whites. South Asians with atypical pain (relative to those with midsternal pain/discomfort) took significantly longer to present to the ER (p=0.037), and were less likely to receive PCI (p=0.008) or CABG (p=0.041).
Atypical presentations were associated with greater delays in arrival to the emergency department and reduced invasive cardiovascular care in South Asians.
急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的成功治疗依赖于其快速识别。目前尚不清楚被接受的胸痛表现是否适用于不同的种族群体。因此,我们研究了白人、南亚裔和华裔 ACS 患者的 ACS 症状和临床治疗结局的潜在种族差异。
横断面调查。
参与者在加拿大四个省份的 12 个中心之一的医院住院。
1334 名 ACS 患者(630 名白人;488 名南亚裔;216 名华裔)。
ACS 表现症状(经典/典型胸骨中疼痛/不适,伴或不伴有左侧颈部、肩部或手臂放射痛)通过自我报告评估。临床治疗结局(急诊科就诊时间、心导管检查;心导管检查、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的接受情况)通过健康记录审核获得。
样本的平均年龄为 62 岁,30%的患者患有 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)。最常见的首发症状是胸骨中任何强度的疼痛/不适,无论种族如何。然而,相当一部分患者报告了非典型症状(33%的白人,19%的南亚裔,20%的华裔;p<0.006)。在校正年龄、性别、教育程度、当前吸烟、冠状动脉疾病程度、糖尿病或慢性肾脏病以及 STEMI 与非 STEMI/不稳定型心绞痛后,南亚裔患者更有可能出现至少中度强度的胸骨中疼痛/不适(校正比值比 [AOR] 1.44;95%CI 1.05 至 1.98),而华裔患者出现放射症状的可能性较小(AOR 0.53;95%CI 0.38 至 0.74)与白人相比。与胸骨中疼痛/不适的南亚裔患者相比,胸痛不典型的患者到急诊科就诊的时间明显延长(p=0.037),接受 PCI(p=0.008)或 CABG(p=0.041)的可能性较小。
不典型表现与南亚裔患者到达急诊科的时间延迟以及接受侵入性心血管治疗的减少有关。