Bureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.
ICF, Fairfax, VA, USA. Now with Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S123-S138. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00264. Print 2019 Mar 11.
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have garnered appeal among governments around the world, making impressive contributions to health resource mobilization and improved health outcomes. Saving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL), a PPP aimed at reducing maternal deaths, was born out of the need to mobilize new actors, capitalize on diverse strengths, and marshal additional resources. A qualitative study was initiated to examine how the SMGL partnership functioned to achieve mortality reduction goals and foster country ownership and sustainability.
We purposively selected 57 individuals from U.S. and global public and private partner organizations engaged in SMGL in Uganda and Zambia for qualitative in-depth interviews. Representative selection was based on participant knowledge of partner activities and engagement with the partnership at various points in time. Of those invited, 46 agreed to participate. Transcripts were double-coded, and discordant codes were resolved by consensus.
Several recurring themes emerged from our study. Perceived strengths of the partnership included goal alignment; diversity in partner expertise; high-quality monitoring, evaluation, and learning; and strong leadership and country ownership. These strengths helped SMGL achieve its goals in reducing maternal and newborn mortality. However, uncertainty in roles and responsibilities, perceived power inequities between partners, bureaucratic processes, a compressed timeline, and limited representation from ministries of health in the SMGL governance structure were reported impediments.
While SMGL faced many of the same challenges experienced by other PPPs, local counterparts and the SMGL partners were able to address many of these issues and the partnership was ultimately praised for being a successful model of interagency coordination. Efforts to facilitate country ownership and short-term financial sustainability have been put in place for many elements of the SMGL approach; however, long-term financing is still a challenge for SMGL as well as other global health PPPs. Addressing key impediments outlined in this study may improve long-term sustainability of similar PPPs.
公私合作伙伴关系(PPPs)在全球各国政府中引起了关注,为调动卫生资源和改善卫生成果做出了巨大贡献。旨在减少孕产妇死亡的公私合作伙伴关系项目“拯救母亲,赋予生命”(SMGL)的诞生,是为了调动新的行动者、利用各种优势和筹集额外资源的需要。启动了一项定性研究,以考察 SMGL 伙伴关系如何运作以实现降低死亡率目标,并促进国家自主权和可持续性。
我们从参与乌干达和赞比亚 SMGL 的美国和全球公共和私营合作伙伴组织中,有目的地选择了 57 名个人进行定性深入访谈。代表性选择基于参与者对伙伴活动的了解以及在不同时间点与伙伴关系的参与。在受邀者中,有 46 人同意参与。转录本进行了双重编码,有分歧的代码通过共识解决。
我们的研究出现了几个反复出现的主题。合作伙伴关系的一些明显优势包括目标一致;合作伙伴专业知识的多样性;高质量的监测、评估和学习;以及强有力的领导和国家自主权。这些优势帮助 SMGL 实现了降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率的目标。然而,角色和责任的不确定性、合作伙伴之间感知到的权力不平等、官僚程序、时间紧迫以及卫生部在 SMGL 治理结构中的代表性有限,都被报告为障碍。
虽然 SMGL 面临着其他 PPP 所面临的许多相同挑战,但当地对应方和 SMGL 合作伙伴能够解决其中的许多问题,该伙伴关系最终因其成为机构间协调的成功模式而受到赞誉。为了促进国家自主权和短期财务可持续性,已经为 SMGL 方法的许多要素做出了努力;然而,长期融资仍然是 SMGL 以及其他全球卫生 PPP 的一个挑战。解决本研究中概述的关键障碍可能会提高类似 PPP 的长期可持续性。