Suppr超能文献

聚合酶链反应(PCR)和显微镜检查在尼泊尔东部三级医疗中心酸性消化性疾病胃活检标本检测中的应用

Application of PCR and Microscopy to Detect in Gastric Biopsy Specimen among Acid Peptic Disorders at Tertiary Care Centre in Eastern Nepal.

作者信息

Pokhrel Nayanum, Khanal Basudha, Rai Keshav, Subedi Manish, Bhattarai Narayan Raj

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.

Department of Internal Medicine, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.

出版信息

Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2019 Feb 5;2019:3695307. doi: 10.1155/2019/3695307. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

infection is most prevalent in developing countries. It is an etiological agent of peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Despite the development of different assays to confirm infection, the diagnosis of infection is challenged by precision of the applied assay. Hence, the aim of this study was to understand the diagnostic accuracy of PCR and microscopy to detect the in the gastric antrum biopsy specimen from gastric disorder patients.

METHODS

A total of 52 patients with gastric disorders underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy. The infection in gastric biopsies was identified after examination by microscopy and 23S rRNA specific PCR. The agreement between two test results were analysed by McNemar's test and Kappa coefficient.

RESULT

infection was confirmed in 9 (17.30%) patients by both assays, 6.25% in antral gastritis, 22.22% in gastric ulcer, 100% in gastric ulcer with duodenitis, 50% in gastric ulcer with duodenal ulcer, and 33.33% in severe erosive duodenitis with antral gastritis. Out of nine infection confirmed patients, 3 patients were confirmed by microscopy and 8 patients by PCR. In case of two patients, both microscopy and PCR assay confirmed the infection. The agreement between two test results was 86.54% and disagreed by 13.46% ( value > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We found that PCR assay to detect is more sensitive than microscopy. However, we advocate for the combination of both assays to increase the strength of diagnostic accuracy due to the absence of the gold standard assay for infection.

摘要

背景

感染在发展中国家最为普遍。它是消化性溃疡、胃腺癌和黏膜相关淋巴组织(MALT)淋巴瘤的病原体。尽管已开发出不同的检测方法来确诊感染,但所应用检测方法的准确性对感染的诊断构成了挑战。因此,本研究的目的是了解聚合酶链反应(PCR)和显微镜检查在检测胃部疾病患者胃窦活检标本中[具体病原体名称未给出]的诊断准确性。

方法

共有52例胃部疾病患者接受了上消化道内镜检查及活检。通过显微镜检查和23S rRNA特异性PCR检测胃活检标本中的[具体病原体名称未给出]感染。采用McNemar检验和Kappa系数分析两种检测结果之间的一致性。

结果

两种检测方法均在9例(17.30%)患者中确诊[具体病原体名称未给出]感染,在胃窦炎患者中为6.25%,胃溃疡患者中为22.22%,胃溃疡合并十二指肠炎症患者中为100%,胃溃疡合并十二指肠溃疡患者中为50%,重度糜烂性十二指肠炎症合并胃窦炎患者中为33.33%。在9例确诊[具体病原体名称未给出]感染的患者中,3例通过显微镜检查确诊,8例通过PCR确诊。有2例患者,显微镜检查和PCR检测均确诊了[具体病原体名称未给出]感染。两种检测结果之间的一致性为86.54%,不一致率为13.46%(P值>0.05)。

结论

我们发现检测[具体病原体名称未给出]的PCR检测方法比显微镜检查更敏感。然而,由于缺乏用于[具体病原体名称未给出]感染的金标准检测方法,我们主张将两种检测方法结合使用以提高诊断准确性的力度。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

10
Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: what should be the gold standard?幽门螺杆菌的诊断:什么应作为金标准?
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 28;20(36):12847-59. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.12847.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验