Rodrigues da Costa Maria, Gasa Josep, Calderón Díaz Julia Adriana, Postma Merel, Dewulf Jeroen, McCutcheon Gerard, Manzanilla Edgar Garcia
Pig Development Department, Teagasc - Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
2Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinaria, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
Porcine Health Manag. 2019 Mar 1;5:4. doi: 10.1186/s40813-018-0113-6. eCollection 2019.
Biosecurity is one of the main factors affecting disease occurrence and antimicrobial use, and it is associated with performance in pig production. However, the importance of specific measures could vary depending on the (national) context. The aim of this study was to describe the biosecurity status in a cohort of Irish pig farms, to investigate which of those biosecurity aspects are more relevant by using the Biocheck.UGent™ scoring system, and to study the impact of such aspects on farm performance.
External biosecurity score was high compared to most countries due to the characteristics of the Irish pig sector (i.e. purchasing only semen and breeding gilts on farm). The internal biosecurity score was lower and had greater variability among farms than other EU countries. Using multivariable linear regression, the biosecurity practices explained 8, 23, and 16% of variability in piglet mortality, finisher mortality, and average daily gain, respectively. Three clusters of farms were defined based on their biosecurity scores (0 to 100) using principal components and hierarchical clustering analysis. Scores for clusters 1, 2 and 3 were (mean ± SD) 38 ± 7.6, 61 ± 7.0 and 66 ± 9.8 for internal and 73 ± 5.1, 74 ± 5.3 and 86 ± 4.5 for external biosecurity. Cluster 3 had lower piglet mortality ( 0.022) and higher average daily gain ( 0.037) when compared to cluster 2.
Irish farms follow European tendencies with internal biosecurity posing as the biggest liability. Our results suggest that practices related to the environment and region, feed, water and equipment supply, and the management of the different stages, need to be addressed in lower performing farms to improve productive performance. Further studies on the economic impact of these biosecurity practices including complementary data on herd health, gilt rearing, piglet management, vaccination and feeding strategies are needed.
生物安全是影响疾病发生和抗菌药物使用的主要因素之一,并且与生猪生产性能相关。然而,具体措施的重要性可能因(国家)背景而异。本研究的目的是描述一组爱尔兰猪场的生物安全状况,使用Biocheck.UGent™评分系统调查哪些生物安全方面更为相关,并研究这些方面对猪场性能的影响。
由于爱尔兰生猪行业的特点(即农场仅购买精液和繁殖后备母猪),与大多数国家相比,外部生物安全评分较高。内部生物安全评分较低,且农场间的变异性比其他欧盟国家更大。使用多变量线性回归分析,生物安全措施分别解释了仔猪死亡率、育肥猪死亡率和平均日增重变异性的8%、23%和16%。使用主成分分析和层次聚类分析,根据生物安全评分(0至100)定义了三类猪场。第1、2和3类猪场的内部生物安全评分分别为(均值±标准差)38±7.6、61±7.0和66±9.8,外部生物安全评分为73±5.1、74±5.3和86±4.5。与第2类猪场相比,第3类猪场的仔猪死亡率更低(P = 0.022),平均日增重更高(P = 0.037)。
爱尔兰猪场遵循欧洲的趋势,内部生物安全是最大的不利因素。我们的结果表明,表现较差的猪场需要解决与环境和区域、饲料、水和设备供应以及不同阶段管理相关的问题,以提高生产性能。需要进一步研究这些生物安全措施的经济影响,包括有关畜群健康、后备母猪饲养、仔猪管理、疫苗接种和饲养策略的补充数据。