• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响生长育肥猪死亡率、采食量和饲料转化率的管理因素。

Management factors affecting mortality, feed intake and feed conversion ratio of grow-finishing pigs.

作者信息

Agostini P S, Fahey A G, Manzanilla E G, O'Doherty J V, de Blas C, Gasa J

机构信息

1Grup de Nutrició,Maneig i Benestar Animal,Department de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,08193 Bellaterra,Spain.

2School of Agriculture and Food Science,University College Dublin,Dublin 4,Belfield,Ireland.

出版信息

Animal. 2014 Aug;8(8):1312-8. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113001912. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1017/S1751731113001912
PMID:24229728
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of animal management and farm facilities on total feed intake (TFI), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and mortality rate (MORT) of grower-finishing pigs. In total, 310 batches from 244 grower-finishing farms, consisting of 454 855 Pietrain sired pigs in six Spanish pig companies were used. Data collection consisted of a survey on management practices (season of placement, split-sex by pens, number of pig origins, water source in the farm, initial or final BW) and facilities (floor, feeder, ventilation or number of animals placed) during 2008 and 2009. Results indicated that batches of pigs placed between January and March had higher TFI (P=0.006), FCR (P=0.005) and MORT (P=0.03) than those placed between July and September. Moreover, batches of pigs placed between April and June had lower MORT (P=0.003) than those placed between January and March. Batches which had split-sex pens had lower TFI (P=0.001) and better FCR (P<0.001) than those with mixed-sex in pens; pigs fed with a single-space feeder with incorporated drinker also had the lowest TFI (P<0.001) and best FCR (P<0.001) in comparison to single and multi-space feeders without a drinker. Pigs placed in pens with <50% slatted floors presented an improvement in FCR (P<0.05) than pens with 50% or more slatted floors. Batches filled with pigs from multiple origins had higher MORT (P<0.001) than those from a single origin. Pigs housed in barns that performed manual ventilation control presented higher MORT (P<0.001) in comparison to automatic ventilation. The regression analysis also indicated that pigs which entered to grower-finisher facilities with higher initial BW had lower MORT (P<0.05) and finally pigs which were sent to slaughterhouse with a higher final BW presented higher TFI (P<0.001). The variables selected for each dependent variable explained 61.9%, 24.8% and 20.4% of the total variability for TFI, FCR and MORT, respectively. This study indicates that farms can increase growth performance and reduce mortality by improving farm facilities and/or modifying management practices.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定养殖管理和农场设施对生长育肥猪的总采食量(TFI)、饲料转化率(FCR)和死亡率(MORT)的影响。总共使用了来自244个生长育肥猪场的310批次猪,这些猪由西班牙6家养猪公司的454855头皮特兰猪组成。数据收集包括对2008年和2009年期间的管理实践(入栏季节、按栏分性别、猪的来源数量、农场水源、初始或最终体重)和设施(地面、饲喂器、通风或存栏动物数量)进行调查。结果表明,1月至3月入栏的猪批次比7月至9月入栏的猪批次具有更高的总采食量(P = 0.006)、饲料转化率(P = 0.005)和死亡率(P = 0.03)。此外,4月至6月入栏的猪批次比1月至3月入栏的猪批次死亡率更低(P = 0.003)。与栏内混养性别的猪批次相比,按栏分性别的猪批次总采食量更低(P = 0.001),饲料转化率更好(P < 0.001);与不带饮水器的单空间和多空间饲喂器相比,配备一体式饮水器的单空间饲喂器饲喂的猪总采食量也最低(P < 0.001),饲料转化率最佳(P < 0.001)。与板条地面占50%或更多的栏舍相比,板条地面占比小于50%的栏舍中猪的饲料转化率有所提高(P < 0.05)。来自多个来源的猪批次比单一来源的猪批次死亡率更高(P < 0.001)。与自动通风的猪舍相比,采用人工通风控制的猪舍中猪的死亡率更高(P < 0.001)。回归分析还表明,初始体重较高进入生长育肥设施的猪死亡率较低(P < 0.05),最终体重较高被送去屠宰场的猪总采食量更高(P < 0.001)。为每个因变量选择的变量分别解释了总采食量、饲料转化率和死亡率总变异性的61.9%、24.8%和20.4%。本研究表明,农场可以通过改善农场设施和/或改变管理实践来提高生长性能并降低死亡率。

相似文献

1
Management factors affecting mortality, feed intake and feed conversion ratio of grow-finishing pigs.影响生长育肥猪死亡率、采食量和饲料转化率的管理因素。
Animal. 2014 Aug;8(8):1312-8. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113001912. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
2
Managing variability in decision making in swine growing-finishing units.管理生猪育肥单元决策中的变异性。
Ir Vet J. 2015 Sep 1;68(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13620-015-0048-z. eCollection 2015.
3
Effects of feeder-trough space and variation in body weight within a pen of pigs on performance in a wean-to-finish production system.在断奶至育肥生产系统中,猪栏内饲槽空间及猪只体重差异对猪生长性能的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2002 Sep;80(9):2241-6. doi: 10.2527/2002.8092241x.
4
Factors affecting the daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio of pigs in grow-finishing units: the case of a company.影响生长育肥舍猪只日采食量和饲料转化率的因素:以某公司为例
Porcine Health Manag. 2016 Mar 1;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s40813-016-0023-4. eCollection 2016.
5
Meta-analysis on the effects of the physical environment, animal traits, feeder and feed characteristics on the feeding behaviour and performance of growing-finishing pigs.关于物理环境、动物特性、给料器和饲料特性对生长-育肥猪的采食行为和性能的影响的荟萃分析。
Animal. 2012 Aug;6(8):1275-89. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000328.
6
Animal and management factors influencing grower and finisher pig performance and efficiency in European systems: a meta-analysis.影响欧洲养殖系统中生长育肥猪生产性能和效率的动物及管理因素:一项荟萃分析
Animal. 2015 Jul;9(7):1210-20. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115000269. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
7
Wean-to-finish feeder space availability effects on nursery and finishing pig performance and total tract digestibility in a commercial setting when feeding dried distillers grains with solubles.在商业环境中,当饲喂含可溶物的干酒糟时,断奶至育肥阶段的采食空间可用性对保育猪和育肥猪性能以及全肠道消化率的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2015 Apr;93(4):1905-15. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8136.
8
Effects of eating space and availability of water in feeders on productivity and eating behavior of grower/finisher pigs.采食空间及饮水器供水情况对生长育肥猪生产性能和采食行为的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2000 Apr;78(4):865-70. doi: 10.2527/2000.784865x.
9
Effects of proportion of pigs removed from a group and subsequent floor space on growth performance of finishing pigs.从一组中移出的猪的比例以及后续栏舍空间对育肥猪生长性能的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2005 Feb;83(2):449-54. doi: 10.2527/2005.832449x.
10
Performance of finishing pigs in hoop structures and confinement during winter and summer.冬季和夏季育肥猪在栏式结构和圈养环境中的生长性能。
J Anim Sci. 2003 Jul;81(7):1663-70. doi: 10.2527/2003.8171663x.

引用本文的文献

1
Using complex diets post-weaning improves piglet performance and financial outcomes.断奶后采用复杂日粮可提高仔猪生产性能和经济效益。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025 Jun 17;57(6):275. doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04519-z.
2
Development of a Feed Conversion Ratio Prediction Model for Yorkshire Boars Using Cumulative Feed Intake.基于累计采食量的大白公猪饲料转化率预测模型的建立
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;15(4):507. doi: 10.3390/ani15040507.
3
Utilizing productivity and health breeding-to-market information along with disease diagnostic data to identify pig mortality risk factors in a U.S. swine production system.
利用繁殖至上市阶段的生产效率和健康信息以及疾病诊断数据,识别美国生猪生产系统中的猪死亡风险因素。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jan 11;10:1301392. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1301392. eCollection 2023.
4
Mitigating the Environmental Impacts from Pig and Broiler Chicken Productions: Case Study on a Citrus Extract Feed Additive.减轻生猪和肉鸡生产对环境的影响:柑橘提取物饲料添加剂的案例研究
Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 29;13(23):3702. doi: 10.3390/ani13233702.
5
Field Implementation of Forecasting Models for Predicting Nursery Mortality in a Midwestern US Swine Production System.美国中西部生猪养殖系统中预测仔猪死亡率的预测模型的实地应用
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;13(15):2412. doi: 10.3390/ani13152412.
6
Economic losses associated with respiratory and helminth infections in domestic pigs in Lira district, Northern Uganda.乌干达北部利拉区家猪呼吸道和蠕虫感染造成的经济损失。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jun 16;10:1198461. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1198461. eCollection 2023.
7
Fattening Iberian Pigs Indoors vs. Outdoors: Production Performance and Market Value.室内饲养与室外饲养伊比利亚肥育猪:生产性能与市场价值
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 31;13(3):506. doi: 10.3390/ani13030506.
8
Farm characteristics affecting antibiotic consumption in pig farms in England.影响英国猪场抗生素使用量的农场特征
Porcine Health Manag. 2022 Jan 28;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40813-022-00248-z.
9
Hens That Exhibit Poorer Feed Efficiency Produce Eggs with Lower Albumen Quality and Are Prone to Being Overweight.饲料效率较低的母鸡所产鸡蛋的蛋白质量较低,且容易超重。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 16;11(10):2986. doi: 10.3390/ani11102986.
10
Risk Factors for Antimicrobial Use on Irish Pig Farms.爱尔兰养猪场使用抗菌药物的风险因素。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 28;11(10):2828. doi: 10.3390/ani11102828.