• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在结直肠癌筛查环境中,环境风险评分和遗传风险评分的个体和联合风险分层表现。

Performance of individual and joint risk stratification by an environmental risk score and a genetic risk score in a colorectal cancer screening setting.

机构信息

Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.

Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;146(3):627-634. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32272. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.32272
PMID:30868574
Abstract

Early detection of colorectal neoplasms can reduce the disease burden of colorectal cancer by timely intervention of individuals at high risk. Our aim was to evaluate a joint environmental-genetic risk score as a risk stratification tool for early detection of advanced colorectal neoplasm (ACRN). Known environmental risk factors and high-risk genetic loci were summarized into risk scores for ACRN in 1014 eligible participants of a screening study. The performances of single and joint environmental-genetic scores were evaluated with estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the absolute risk, relative risk and predictive ability using the area under the curve (AUC). Individuals with higher environmental risk scores showed increasing ACRN risk, with 3.1-fold for intermediate risk and 4.8-fold for very high risk, compared to the very low environmental risk group. Similarly, individuals with higher genetic risk scores showed increasing ACRN risk, with 2.2-fold for intermediate risk and 3.5-fold for very high risk, compared to the lowest genetic risk group. Moreover, the joint environmental-genetic score improved the ACRN risk stratification and showed higher predictive values (AUC = 0.64; 95%CI = 0.60-0.67) with substantial difference (p = 0.0002) compared to the single environmental score (0.58; 0.55-0.62). The integration of environmental and genetic factors looks promising for improving targeting individuals at high-risk of colorectal neoplasm. Applications in practical screening programs require optimization with additional genetic and other biomarkers involved in colorectal carcinogenesis.

摘要

早期发现结直肠肿瘤可以通过及时干预高危个体来减轻结直肠癌的疾病负担。我们的目的是评估联合环境-遗传风险评分作为一种风险分层工具,用于早期检测高级结直肠肿瘤(ACRN)。在一项筛查研究的 1014 名合格参与者中,将已知的环境危险因素和高风险遗传位点总结为 ACRN 的风险评分。使用曲线下面积(AUC)评估估计值和 95%置信区间(CI)的绝对风险、相对风险和预测能力来评估单因素和联合环境-遗传评分的性能。与极低环境风险组相比,环境风险评分较高的个体具有更高的 ACRN 风险,中危组的风险增加了 3.1 倍,高危组的风险增加了 4.8 倍。同样,遗传风险评分较高的个体具有更高的 ACRN 风险,中危组的风险增加了 2.2 倍,高危组的风险增加了 3.5 倍。此外,联合环境-遗传评分提高了 ACRN 风险分层,显示出更高的预测值(AUC=0.64;95%CI=0.60-0.67),与单因素环境评分(0.58;0.55-0.62)相比有显著差异(p=0.0002)。整合环境和遗传因素有望改善对结直肠肿瘤高危个体的靶向定位。在实际筛查项目中的应用需要优化,包括涉及结直肠癌变的其他遗传和生物标志物。

相似文献

1
Performance of individual and joint risk stratification by an environmental risk score and a genetic risk score in a colorectal cancer screening setting.在结直肠癌筛查环境中,环境风险评分和遗传风险评分的个体和联合风险分层表现。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;146(3):627-634. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32272. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
2
Individual and Joint Associations of Genetic Risk and Healthy Lifestyle Score with Colorectal Neoplasms Among Participants of Screening Colonoscopy.个体和联合遗传风险与健康生活方式评分与筛查结肠镜检查参与者结直肠肿瘤的关系。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Jun;14(6):649-658. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0576. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
3
Association of time to colonoscopy after a positive fecal test result and fecal hemoglobin concentration with risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia.粪便潜血阳性后行结肠镜检查的时间和粪便血红蛋白浓度与结直肠高级别瘤变风险的关系。
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Apr;51(4):589-594. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
4
Individualized colorectal cancer screening based on the clinical risk factors: beyond family history of colorectal cancer.基于临床风险因素的个体化结直肠癌筛查:超越结直肠癌家族史。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.041. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
5
Impact of Age on the Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in a Young Population: An Analysis Using the Predicted Probability Model.年龄对年轻人群中晚期结直肠肿瘤风险的影响:使用预测概率模型的分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Sep;62(9):2518-2525. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4683-y. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
6
Development and validation of a scoring system to identify individuals at high risk for advanced colorectal neoplasms who should undergo colonoscopy screening.开发并验证一种评分系统,以识别出高危进展性结直肠肿瘤的个体,这些个体应接受结肠镜筛查。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;12(3):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.042. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
7
The Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score: a validated tool that stratifies risk for colorectal advanced neoplasia in asymptomatic Asian subjects.亚太结直肠筛查评分:一种经验证的工具,可对无症状亚洲人群结直肠高级别瘤变的风险进行分层。
Gut. 2011 Sep;60(9):1236-41. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.221168. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
8
Prediction of the Risk of a Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasm Using a Novel Scoring System.使用新型评分系统预测异时性晚期结直肠肿瘤的风险
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):3016-3025. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4237-8. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
9
A Risk-Scoring System Combined With a Fecal Immunochemical Test Is Effective in Screening High-Risk Subjects for Early Colonoscopy to Detect Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms.一种结合风险评分系统和粪便免疫化学检测的方法可有效筛查早期结肠镜检查高危人群的进展期结直肠肿瘤。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Mar;150(3):617-625.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.042. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
10
The fecal immunochemical test has high accuracy for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia before age 50.粪便免疫化学检测在50岁之前检测晚期结直肠肿瘤方面具有很高的准确性。
Dig Liver Dis. 2017 May;49(5):557-561. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review: risk prediction models for metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy.系统评价:息肉切除术后异时性晚期结直肠肿瘤的风险预测模型
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Dec;39(12):2533-2544. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16682. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment and Precision Approaches to Screening: Brave New World or Worlds Apart?结直肠癌风险评估与精准筛查方法:崭新世界还是相去甚远?
Gastroenterology. 2023 Apr;164(5):812-827. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
Serum protein profiling of lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers reveals alcohol consumption-mediated disruptions in early-stage cancer detection.
肺癌、胰腺癌和结直肠癌的血清蛋白谱分析揭示了酒精消费对早期癌症检测的干扰。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 15;8(12):e12359. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12359. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Validation of a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score and age-specific risks of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis within diverse populations.多血统多基因风险评分与前列腺癌特定年龄风险的验证:不同人群中的荟萃分析。
Elife. 2022 Jul 8;11:e78304. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78304.
5
Evaluating the Potential of Polygenic Risk Score to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening.评估多基因风险评分提高结直肠癌筛查效果的潜力。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jul 1;31(7):1305-1312. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0042.
6
A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.风险分层肠道筛查的范围综述:当前证据,未来方向。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 May;33(5):653-685. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
7
A risk-prediction score for colorectal lesions on 12,628 participants at high risk of colorectal cancer.针对12628名患结直肠癌高风险参与者的结直肠病变风险预测评分。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2022 Feb 9;10(1):goac002. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goac002. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Polygenic risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a systematic review.多基因风险预测模型在结直肠癌中的应用:系统综述。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 15;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09143-2.
9
Polygenic risk score across distinct colorectal cancer screening outcomes: from premalignant polyps to colorectal cancer.多基因风险评分在不同结直肠癌筛查结局中的应用:从癌前息肉到结直肠癌。
BMC Med. 2021 Nov 8;19(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02134-x.
10
Genetic ancestry differences in pediatric asthma readmission are mediated by socioenvironmental factors.遗传背景差异导致儿科哮喘再入院,其中介因素是社会环境因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Nov;148(5):1210-1218.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.05.046. Epub 2021 Jul 1.