Suppr超能文献

威胁降低了价值驱动但不显著驱动的注意力捕获。

Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture.

机构信息

Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University.

出版信息

Emotion. 2020 Aug;20(5):874-889. doi: 10.1037/emo0000599. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

Abstract

What we direct our attention to is strongly influenced by both bottom-up and top-down processes. Moreover, the control of attention is biased by prior learning, such that attention is automatically captured by stimuli previously associated with either reward or threat. It is unknown whether value-oriented and threat-oriented mechanisms of selective information processing function independently of one another, or whether they interact with each other in the selection process. Here, we introduced the threat of electric shock into the value-driven attentional capture paradigm to examine whether the experience of threat influences the attention capturing quality of previously reward-associated stimuli. The results showed that value-driven attentional capture was blunted by the experience of threat. This contrasts with previous reports of threat potentiating attentional capture by physically salient stimuli, which we replicate here. Our findings demonstrate that threat selectively interferes with value-based but not salience-based attentional priority, consistent with a competitive relationship between value-based and threat-based information processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

我们的注意力会受到自下而上和自上而下过程的强烈影响。此外,注意力的控制受到先前学习的影响,使得注意力会自动被先前与奖励或威胁相关联的刺激所捕获。目前尚不清楚以价值为导向和以威胁为导向的选择性信息处理机制是否相互独立,或者它们在选择过程中是否相互作用。在这里,我们在价值驱动的注意力捕获范式中引入了电击的威胁,以检验威胁的体验是否会影响先前与奖励相关联的刺激的注意力捕获质量。结果表明,威胁体验削弱了价值驱动的注意力捕获。这与先前关于物理上显著的刺激增强威胁注意力捕获的报告形成对比,我们在这里复制了这一报告。我们的研究结果表明,威胁选择性地干扰基于价值的注意力优先级,而不是基于显著度的注意力优先级,这与基于价值和基于威胁的信息处理之间的竞争关系一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2455/6744994/ec45620245de/nihms-1048892-f0001.jpg

相似文献

2
Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture.学习价值放大基于突显的注意力捕获。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027926. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
3
Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection.突显度决定视觉选择中的注意定向。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Oct;46(10):1051-1057. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000796. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
7
Evidence against the low-salience account of attentional suppression.注意力抑制的低显著性解释的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Oct;50(10):1033-1047. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001234. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

2
Rethinking Distraction.重新思考注意力分散
Vis cogn. 2024;32(9-10):959-978. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2024.2335118. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
6
Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control.重新审视三分法:注意控制的整体理论。
Vision Res. 2024 Apr;217:108366. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108366. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
7
Cultural threat perceptions predict violent extremism via need for cognitive closure.文化威胁认知通过认知封闭需求预测暴力极端主义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2213874120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213874120. Epub 2023 May 8.
10
An adaptive view of attentional control.注意控制的自适应观点。
Am Psychol. 2021 Dec;76(9):1410-1422. doi: 10.1037/amp0000917.

本文引用的文献

1
Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture.价值驱动注意捕获的重测信度。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):720-726. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1079-7.
9
What is abnormal about addiction-related attentional biases?与成瘾相关的注意力偏差有哪些异常之处?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Oct 1;167:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
10
The time course of attentional bias to cues of threat and safety.对威胁和安全线索的注意偏向的时间进程。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Aug;31(5):845-857. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1169998. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验