• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唤醒偏向竞争解释了在威胁下,奖励线索引起的分心减少。

Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat.

机构信息

Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, 4235 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843

出版信息

eNeuro. 2020 Jul 7;7(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0099-20.2020. Print 2020 Jul/Aug.

DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0099-20.2020
PMID:32601095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7340842/
Abstract

Anxiety is an adaptive neural state that promotes rapid responses under heightened vigilance when survival is threatened. Anxiety has consistently been found to potentiate the attentional processing of physically salient stimuli. However, a recent study demonstrated that a threat manipulation reduces attentional capture by reward-associated stimuli, suggesting a more complex relationship between anxiety and the control of attention. The mechanisms by which threat can reduce the distracting quality of stimuli are unknown. In this study, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on human subjects, we examined the neural correlates of attention to previously reward-associated stimuli with and without the threat of unpredictable electric shock. We replicate enhanced distractor-evoked activity throughout the value-driven attention network (VDAN) in addition to enhanced stimulus-evoked activity generally under threat. Importantly, these two factors interacted such that the representation of previously reward-associated distractors was particularly pronounced under threat. Our results from neuroimaging fit well with the principle of arousal-biased competition (ABC), although such effects are typically associated with behavioral measures of increased attention to stimuli that already possess elevated attentional priority. The findings of our study suggest that ABC can be leveraged to support more efficient ignoring of reward cues, revealing new insights into the functional significance of ABC as a mechanism of attentional control, and provide a mechanistic explanation of how threat reduces attention to irrelevant reward information.

摘要

焦虑是一种适应性的神经状态,当生存受到威胁时,它能促进在高度警惕下的快速反应。焦虑一直被发现能增强对物理显著刺激的注意力处理。然而,最近的一项研究表明,威胁操纵会减少与奖励相关的刺激的注意力捕获,这表明焦虑与注意力控制之间存在更复杂的关系。威胁可以降低刺激分心质量的机制尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们使用功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)对人类受试者进行了研究,考察了在有和没有不可预测电击威胁的情况下,对先前与奖励相关的刺激的注意力的神经相关性。我们复制了在价值驱动注意力网络(VDAN)中增强的分心诱发活动,除了在威胁下普遍增强的刺激诱发活动。重要的是,这两个因素相互作用,使得先前与奖励相关的分心物的表示在威胁下特别明显。我们的神经影像学结果与唤醒偏见竞争(ABC)的原则非常吻合,尽管这种效应通常与已经具有较高注意力优先级的刺激的注意力增加的行为测量有关。我们的研究结果表明,ABC 可以被利用来支持更有效的忽略奖励线索,这为 ABC 作为注意力控制机制的功能意义提供了新的见解,并为威胁如何减少对无关奖励信息的注意力提供了一种机制解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/462b6b7a72ef/SN-ENUJ200167F005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/4534769b5917/SN-ENUJ200167F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/8f658649cb31/SN-ENUJ200167F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/b5f1c725d4c2/SN-ENUJ200167F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/479565a8ed34/SN-ENUJ200167F004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/462b6b7a72ef/SN-ENUJ200167F005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/4534769b5917/SN-ENUJ200167F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/8f658649cb31/SN-ENUJ200167F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/b5f1c725d4c2/SN-ENUJ200167F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/479565a8ed34/SN-ENUJ200167F004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b93/7340842/462b6b7a72ef/SN-ENUJ200167F005.jpg

相似文献

1
Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat.唤醒偏向竞争解释了在威胁下,奖励线索引起的分心减少。
eNeuro. 2020 Jul 7;7(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0099-20.2020. Print 2020 Jul/Aug.
2
The influence of threat on the efficiency of goal-directed attentional control.威胁对目标导向注意控制效率的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):980-986. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01321-4. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
3
Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.知觉竞争促进行为选择和神经表征中奖励显著性的抑制。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jun 28;37(26):6242-6252. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0217-17.2017. Epub 2017 May 24.
4
How Does Threat Modulate the Motivational Effects of Reward on Attention?威胁如何调节奖励对注意力的动机效应?
Exp Psychol. 2021 May;68(3):165-172. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000521.
5
Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture.威胁降低了价值驱动但不显著驱动的注意力捕获。
Emotion. 2020 Aug;20(5):874-889. doi: 10.1037/emo0000599. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
6
Motivated suppression of value- and threat-modulated attentional capture.动机抑制价值和威胁调节的注意力捕获。
Emotion. 2022 Jun;22(4):780-794. doi: 10.1037/emo0000777. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
7
On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture.关于价值驱动与刺激驱动的注意捕获之间的关系。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):607-613. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01670-2.
8
Attention to Stimuli of Learned versus Innate Biological Value Relies on Separate Neural Systems.注意到学习到的与先天生物价值的刺激依赖于独立的神经系统。
J Neurosci. 2022 Dec 7;42(49):9242-9252. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0925-22.2022. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
9
Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture.价值驱动和选择驱动的注意捕获的分离神经机制。
Brain Res. 2019 Apr 1;1708:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.026. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
Value-modulated oculomotor capture by task-irrelevant stimuli is a consequence of early competition on the saccade map.任务无关刺激引起的价值调制性动眼捕捉是扫视图谱早期竞争的结果。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2226-40. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1135-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye movement evidence for locus coeruleus-noradrenaline system contributions to age differences in attention.蓝斑-去甲肾上腺素系统对注意力年龄差异影响的眼动证据
Psychol Aging. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1037/pag0000930.
2
Rethinking Distraction.重新思考注意力分散
Vis cogn. 2024;32(9-10):959-978. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2024.2335118. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition.衰老会损害反应性注意控制,但不会损害前摄性分心物抑制。

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).作为个体特质来衡量对奖励的注意力:价值驱动注意力问卷(VDAQ)。
Psychol Res. 2020 Nov;84(8):2122-2137. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01212-3. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
2
Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture.威胁降低了价值驱动但不显著驱动的注意力捕获。
Emotion. 2020 Aug;20(5):874-889. doi: 10.1037/emo0000599. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
3
On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli.注意指向威胁性刺激的自动性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jul;153(7):1938-1959. doi: 10.1037/xge0001602. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
Eye movements reveal age differences in how arousal modulates saliency priority but not attention processing speed.眼动揭示了在唤醒如何调节显著性优先级而非注意力处理速度方面的年龄差异。
bioRxiv. 2024 May 8:2024.05.06.592619. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.06.592619.
5
From learned value to sustained bias: how reward conditioning changes attentional priority.从习得的价值到持续的偏差:奖励条件作用如何改变注意力优先级。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Apr 3;18:1354142. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1354142. eCollection 2024.
6
Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control.重新审视三分法:注意控制的整体理论。
Vision Res. 2024 Apr;217:108366. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108366. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
7
(A lack of) effects of acute social stress on attentional bias to threat.急性社会应激对威胁性注意偏向的(缺乏)影响
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2023 Jul 20;15:100195. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100195. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Neural correlates of value-driven spatial orienting.价值驱动的空间定向的神经关联。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Sep;60(9):e14321. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14321. Epub 2023 May 12.
9
Arousal-driven interactions between reward motivation and categorization of emotional facial expressions.奖赏动机与情绪面部表情分类之间由唤醒驱动的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 8;13:985652. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985652. eCollection 2022.
10
Morality in the flesh: on the link between bodily self-consciousness, moral identity and (dis)honest behaviour.肉身中的道德:论身体自我意识、道德认同与(不)诚实行为之间的联系。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 31;9(8):220061. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220061. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Emotion. 2020 Sep;20(6):1109-1112. doi: 10.1037/emo0000596. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
Neural correlates of attentional capture by stimuli previously associated with social reward.先前与社会奖励相关联的刺激引起注意捕获的神经相关物。
Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jan;11(1-2):5-15. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2019.1585338. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
5
On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture.关于价值驱动与刺激驱动的注意捕获之间的关系。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Apr;81(3):607-613. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01670-2.
6
State Anxiety Impairs Proactive but Enhances Reactive Control.状态焦虑会损害主动控制,但增强反应性控制。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 13;9:2570. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02570. eCollection 2018.
7
Neural evidence for automatic value-modulated approach behaviour.自动价值调制趋近行为的神经证据。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.050. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
8
Neurobiology of value-driven attention.价值驱动注意的神经生物学。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
9
Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie value-driven and selection-driven attentional capture.价值驱动和选择驱动的注意捕获的分离神经机制。
Brain Res. 2019 Apr 1;1708:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.026. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.抑制作为解决注意捕获争论的一种潜在方法。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 29.