Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1386-1394. doi: 10.1037/pas0000583. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
The last decade has seen enormous advances in research transparency in psychology. One of these advances has been the creation of a common interface for openness across the sciences-the Open Science Framework (OSF). While social, personality, and cognitive psychologists have been at the fore in participating in open practices on the OSF, clinical psychology has trailed behind. In this article, we discuss the advantages and special considerations for clinical assessment researchers' participation in open science broadly, and specifically in using the OSF for these purposes. We use several studies from our lab to illustrate the uses of the OSF for psychological studies, as well as the process of implementing this tool in assessment research. Among these studies are an archival assessment study, a project using an extensive unpublished assessment battery, and one in which we developed a short-form assessment instrument. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
过去十年,心理学领域的研究透明度取得了巨大进展。其中一个进展是为整个科学界创建了一个公开透明的通用界面——开放科学框架(OSF)。虽然社会、人格和认知心理学家一直在 OSF 上积极参与开放实践,但临床心理学却落后了。在本文中,我们讨论了临床评估研究人员广泛参与开放科学的优势和特殊考虑因素,特别是将 OSF 用于这些目的。我们使用实验室的几项研究来说明 OSF 在心理研究中的用途,以及在评估研究中实施该工具的过程。这些研究包括一项档案评估研究、一个使用大量未发表评估工具的项目,以及我们开发一种简短评估工具的项目。