• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁是最耀眼的明星?——一项对顶尖 STEM 研究生 25 年的纵向研究。

Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Human Development.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;119(2):390-416. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000239. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000239
PMID:30869985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6745019/
Abstract

In 1992, the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) surveyed 714 first- and second-year graduate students (48.5% female) attending U.S. universities ranked in the top-15 by science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) field. This study investigated whether individual differences assessed early in their graduate school career were associated with becoming a STEM leader 25 years later (e.g., STEM full professors at research-intensive universities, STEM CEOs, and STEM leaders in government) versus not becoming a STEM leader. We also studied whether there were any important gender differences in relation to STEM leadership. For both men and women, small to medium effect size differences in interests, values, and personality distinguished STEM leaders from nonleaders. Lifestyle and work preferences also distinguished STEM leaders who were more exclusively career-focused and preferred to work-and did work-more hours than nonleaders. Also, there were small to large gender differences in abilities, interests, and lifestyle preferences. Men had more intense interests in STEM and were more career-focused. Women had more diverse educational and occupational interests, and they were more interested in activities outside of work. Early in graduate school, therefore, there are signs that predict who will become a STEM leader-even among elite STEM graduate students. Given the many ways in which STEM leadership can be achieved, the gender differences uncovered within this high-potential sample suggest that men and women are likely to assign different priorities to these opportunities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

1992 年,数学早熟青年研究(SMPY)调查了在美国排名前 15 的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域的大学就读的 714 名一年级和二年级研究生(48.5%为女性)。这项研究调查了在研究生生涯早期评估的个体差异是否与 25 年后成为 STEM 领导者(例如,研究型大学的 STEM 正教授、STEM 首席执行官以及政府中的 STEM 领导者)相关,而不是不成为 STEM 领导者。我们还研究了与 STEM 领导力相关的是否存在任何重要的性别差异。对于男性和女性,在兴趣、价值观和个性方面的小到中等效应大小差异将 STEM 领导者与非领导者区分开来。生活方式和工作偏好也将专注于职业、更喜欢工作且工作时间多于非领导者的 STEM 领导者区分开来。此外,在能力、兴趣和生活方式偏好方面存在小到大幅度的性别差异。男性对 STEM 的兴趣更强烈,更专注于职业。女性对教育和职业的兴趣更加多样化,她们对工作以外的活动更感兴趣。因此,在研究生早期,就有迹象表明谁将成为 STEM 领导者,即使是在精英 STEM 研究生中也是如此。鉴于 STEM 领导力可以通过多种方式实现,在这个高潜力样本中发现的性别差异表明,男性和女性可能会对这些机会赋予不同的优先级。

相似文献

1
Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.谁是最耀眼的明星?——一项对顶尖 STEM 研究生 25 年的纵向研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;119(2):390-416. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000239. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
Growing STEM: Perceived faculty mindset as an indicator of communal affordances in STEM.促进 STEM 发展:感知到的教师思维模式是 STEM 中公共促成因素的指标。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Aug;117(2):260-281. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000154. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
3
The Effects of Doctoral Teaching Development on Early-Career STEM Scholars' College Teaching Self-efficacy.博士生教学发展对早期职业 STEM 学者大学教学自我效能感的影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Spring;17(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-02-0039.
4
Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood.顶尖数学/科学研究生和极有天赋者的工作偏好、生活价值观及个人观点:成年初期和为人父母阶段的发展变化及性别差异
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Sep;97(3):517-32. doi: 10.1037/a0016030.
5
Multi-institutional study of GRE scores as predictors of STEM PhD degree completion: GRE gets a low mark.多机构研究 GRE 分数作为 STEM 博士学位完成的预测指标:GRE 得分较低。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 29;13(10):e0206570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206570. eCollection 2018.
6
Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.13 岁时评估的心理星座可预测 35 年后截然不同的卓越形式。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):444-454. doi: 10.1177/0956797618822524. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
Reframing Achievement Setbacks: A Motivation Intervention to Improve 8-Year Graduation Rates for Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Fields.重新定义成就挫折:一项提高科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域学生 8 年毕业率的动机干预措施。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;31(6):623-633. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904451. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Structure and belonging: Pathways to success for underrepresented minority and women PhD students in STEM fields.结构与归属:少数族裔和女性 STEM 博士生取得成功的途径。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0209279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209279. eCollection 2019.
9
Patching the Leaks: Revitalizing and Reimagining the STEM Pipeline.查漏补缺:振兴和重塑 STEM 人才管道。
Cell. 2020 Oct 29;183(3):568-575. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.029.
10
Preparation of Underrepresented Males for Scientific Careers: A Study of the Dr. John H. Hopps Jr. Defense Research Scholars Program at Morehouse College.为科学事业培养代表性不足的男性:对莫尔豪斯学院小约翰·H·霍普斯博士国防研究学者项目的研究。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Fall;15(3). doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-12-0263.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences in emerging adults' spatial abilities: What role do affective factors play?成年早期个体空间能力的差异:情感因素扮演什么角色?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Mar 18;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00538-w.
2
Academic Acceleration in Gifted Youth and Fruitless Concerns Regarding Psychological Well-Being: A 35-Year Longitudinal Study.天才青少年的学业加速与对心理健康的无端担忧:一项35年的纵向研究
J Educ Psychol. 2021 May;113(4):830-845. doi: 10.1037/edu0000500. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Effects of Culture on the Balance Between Mathematics Achievement and Subjective Wellbeing.文化对数学成绩与主观幸福感平衡的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:894774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894774. eCollection 2022.
4
Evidence and Implications from a Natural Experiment of Prenatal Androgen Effects on Gendered Behavior.产前雄激素对性别行为影响的自然实验的证据及启示
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2021 Jun;30(3):202-210. doi: 10.1177/0963721421998341. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
5
Developmental Histories Facilitating the Emergence of Creative Scientific Expertise: The Role of Developed Cognitive Talents, Education, and Social and Cultural Contexts.促进创造性科学专长出现的发展历程:成熟认知才能、教育以及社会文化背景的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 3;12:716529. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716529. eCollection 2021.
6
Critical Thinking: A Model of Intelligence for Solving Real-World Problems.批判性思维:一种解决现实世界问题的智力模型。
J Intell. 2021 Apr 7;9(2):22. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9020022.
7
Understanding educational, occupational, and creative outcomes requires assessing intraindividual differences in abilities and interests.要了解教育、职业和创造性成果,需要评估个体在能力和兴趣方面的差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 21;117(29):16720-16722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009042117. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
Gender differences in the pathways to higher education.性别差异与高等教育途径。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 23;117(25):14073-14076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002861117. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
9
Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.13 岁时评估的心理星座可预测 35 年后截然不同的卓越形式。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):444-454. doi: 10.1177/0956797618822524. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Normative changes in interests from adolescence to adulthood: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.从青春期到成年期兴趣的规范变化:纵向研究的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;144(4):426-451. doi: 10.1037/bul0000140. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education.科学、技术、工程和数学教育中的性别平等悖论。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;29(4):581-593. doi: 10.1177/0956797617741719. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
3
Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions.科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域的性别差距:当前认知、对实践、政策及未来方向的影响
Educ Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;29(1):119-140. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
4
Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research.个体差异及其测量:100 年研究综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):254-273. doi: 10.1037/apl0000151. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
5
Vocational interests assessed at the end of high school predict life outcomes assessed 10 years later over and above IQ and Big Five personality traits.在高中结束时评估的职业兴趣可以预测 10 年后的生活结果,超过智商和大五人格特质的预测。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):167-184. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000117. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
6
When Lightning Strikes Twice: Profoundly Gifted, Profoundly Accomplished.当闪电击中两次:天赋异禀,成就非凡。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;27(7):1004-18. doi: 10.1177/0956797616644735. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable.与男性相比,女性认为职业晋升同样可以实现,但吸引力较小。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12354-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502567112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
8
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
9
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
10
Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise.35 年后对早慧青年的研究:揭示数学-科学专长发展的前因。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;1(4):316-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x.