Suppr超能文献

13 岁时评估的心理星座可预测 35 年后截然不同的卓越形式。

Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.

机构信息

Department of Psychology & Human Development, Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):444-454. doi: 10.1177/0956797618822524. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

Abstract

This investigation examined whether math/scientific and verbal/humanistic ability and preference constellations, developed on intellectually talented 13-year-olds to predict their educational outcomes at age 23, continue to maintain their longitudinal potency by distinguishing distinct forms of eminence 35 years later. Eminent individuals were defined as those who, by age 50, had accomplished something rare: creative and highly impactful careers (e.g., full professors at research-intensive universities, Fortune 500 executives, distinguished judges and lawyers, leaders in biomedicine, award-winning journalists and writers). Study 1 consisted of 677 intellectually precocious youths, assessed at age 13, whose leadership and creative accomplishments were assessed 35 years later. Study 2 constituted a constructive replication-an analysis of 605 top science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) graduate students, assessed on the same predictor constructs early in graduate school and assessed again 25 years later. In both samples, the same ability and preference parameter values, which defined math/scientific versus verbal/humanistic constellations, discriminated participants who ultimately achieved distinct forms of eminence from their peers pursuing other life endeavors.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨,在 13 岁的高智商青少年中形成的数学/科学和语言/人文能力及偏好组合,是否能够通过区分 35 年后不同形式的卓越成就,继续保持其纵向效力。杰出个体的定义是,到 50 岁时已经取得了一些罕见的成就:具有创造性和高度影响力的职业(例如,研究型大学的正教授、财富 500 强公司的高管、杰出的法官和律师、生物医学领域的领导者、获奖记者和作家)。研究 1 包括 677 名在 13 岁时接受评估的智力早熟青少年,他们的领导能力和创新成就在 35 年后进行了评估。研究 2 是一项构建性复制分析,对 605 名顶尖的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)研究生进行了分析,这些研究生在研究生早期接受了相同的预测因素评估,25 年后再次进行了评估。在这两个样本中,定义数学/科学与语言/人文组合的相同能力和偏好参数值,区分了最终取得不同形式卓越成就的参与者和追求其他生活事业的同龄人。

相似文献

1
Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):444-454. doi: 10.1177/0956797618822524. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
2
Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity.
Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):957-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02182.x.
3
Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later.
Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2217-32. doi: 10.1177/0956797614551371. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
4
Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;119(2):390-416. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000239. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
8
Creativity and technical innovation: spatial ability's unique role.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1831-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797613478615. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
9
Creativity anxiety: Evidence for anxiety that is specific to creative thinking, from STEM to the arts.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jan;149(1):42-57. doi: 10.1037/xge0000630. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
10
Spatial Processing in Infancy Predicts Both Spatial and Mathematical Aptitude in Childhood.
Psychol Sci. 2016 Oct;27(10):1291-1298. doi: 10.1177/0956797616655977. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Hasn't the Gifted Label Caught up with Science?
J Intell. 2022 Oct 12;10(4):84. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040084.
2
Changing priorities in the development of cognitive competence and school learning: A general theory.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:954971. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954971. eCollection 2022.
4
Interest-Ability Profiles: An Integrative Approach to Knowledge Acquisition.
J Intell. 2022 Jul 16;10(3):43. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030043.
6
Understanding educational, occupational, and creative outcomes requires assessing intraindividual differences in abilities and interests.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 21;117(29):16720-16722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009042117. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;119(2):390-416. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000239. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
When Lightning Strikes Twice: Profoundly Gifted, Profoundly Accomplished.
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;27(7):1004-18. doi: 10.1177/0956797616644735. Epub 2016 May 25.
3
Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12354-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502567112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
5
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
7
Creativity and technical innovation: spatial ability's unique role.
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1831-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797613478615. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
8
Investment and intellect: a review and meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):841-69. doi: 10.1037/a0030746. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
9
The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies.
Psychol Bull. 2013 Mar;139(2):352-402. doi: 10.1037/a0028446. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验