• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

13 岁时评估的心理星座可预测 35 年后截然不同的卓越形式。

Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.

机构信息

Department of Psychology & Human Development, Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):444-454. doi: 10.1177/0956797618822524. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1177/0956797618822524
PMID:30694728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6419263/
Abstract

This investigation examined whether math/scientific and verbal/humanistic ability and preference constellations, developed on intellectually talented 13-year-olds to predict their educational outcomes at age 23, continue to maintain their longitudinal potency by distinguishing distinct forms of eminence 35 years later. Eminent individuals were defined as those who, by age 50, had accomplished something rare: creative and highly impactful careers (e.g., full professors at research-intensive universities, Fortune 500 executives, distinguished judges and lawyers, leaders in biomedicine, award-winning journalists and writers). Study 1 consisted of 677 intellectually precocious youths, assessed at age 13, whose leadership and creative accomplishments were assessed 35 years later. Study 2 constituted a constructive replication-an analysis of 605 top science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) graduate students, assessed on the same predictor constructs early in graduate school and assessed again 25 years later. In both samples, the same ability and preference parameter values, which defined math/scientific versus verbal/humanistic constellations, discriminated participants who ultimately achieved distinct forms of eminence from their peers pursuing other life endeavors.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨,在 13 岁的高智商青少年中形成的数学/科学和语言/人文能力及偏好组合,是否能够通过区分 35 年后不同形式的卓越成就,继续保持其纵向效力。杰出个体的定义是,到 50 岁时已经取得了一些罕见的成就:具有创造性和高度影响力的职业(例如,研究型大学的正教授、财富 500 强公司的高管、杰出的法官和律师、生物医学领域的领导者、获奖记者和作家)。研究 1 包括 677 名在 13 岁时接受评估的智力早熟青少年,他们的领导能力和创新成就在 35 年后进行了评估。研究 2 是一项构建性复制分析,对 605 名顶尖的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)研究生进行了分析,这些研究生在研究生早期接受了相同的预测因素评估,25 年后再次进行了评估。在这两个样本中,定义数学/科学与语言/人文组合的相同能力和偏好参数值,区分了最终取得不同形式卓越成就的参与者和追求其他生活事业的同龄人。

相似文献

1
Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.13 岁时评估的心理星座可预测 35 年后截然不同的卓越形式。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):444-454. doi: 10.1177/0956797618822524. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
2
Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity.拥有同等学位的人之间的能力差异对科学创造力很重要。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):957-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02182.x.
3
Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later.四十年后,数学早慧男性和女性的人生轨迹和成就。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2217-32. doi: 10.1177/0956797614551371. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
4
Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.谁是最耀眼的明星?——一项对顶尖 STEM 研究生 25 年的纵向研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;119(2):390-416. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000239. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
Who Chooses STEM Careers? Using A Relative Cognitive Strength and Interest Model to Predict Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.谁会选择从事STEM职业?运用相对认知优势与兴趣模型预测科学、技术、工程和数学领域的职业。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Aug;46(8):1805-1820. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0618-8. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
6
Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years.不同的智力模式预示着艺术和科学领域的创造力:对25年来智力早熟的年轻人进行跟踪研究。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Nov;18(11):948-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02007.x.
7
Not lack of ability but more choice: individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.不是缺乏能力,而是更多选择:个体和性别差异对科学、技术、工程和数学职业选择的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):770-5. doi: 10.1177/0956797612458937. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
Creativity and technical innovation: spatial ability's unique role.创造力和技术创新:空间能力的独特作用。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1831-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797613478615. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
9
Creativity anxiety: Evidence for anxiety that is specific to creative thinking, from STEM to the arts.创造力焦虑:来自 STEM 到艺术领域的创造性思维特有的焦虑证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jan;149(1):42-57. doi: 10.1037/xge0000630. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
10
Spatial Processing in Infancy Predicts Both Spatial and Mathematical Aptitude in Childhood.婴儿时期的空间处理能力预测儿童时期的空间和数学能力。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Oct;27(10):1291-1298. doi: 10.1177/0956797616655977. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Hasn't the Gifted Label Caught up with Science?为什么“天才”标签没有跟上科学的步伐?
J Intell. 2022 Oct 12;10(4):84. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10040084.
2
Changing priorities in the development of cognitive competence and school learning: A general theory.认知能力发展与学校学习中的优先事项转变:一种通用理论。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:954971. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954971. eCollection 2022.
3
Academic Acceleration in Gifted Youth and Fruitless Concerns Regarding Psychological Well-Being: A 35-Year Longitudinal Study.天才青少年的学业加速与对心理健康的无端担忧:一项35年的纵向研究
J Educ Psychol. 2021 May;113(4):830-845. doi: 10.1037/edu0000500. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
4
Interest-Ability Profiles: An Integrative Approach to Knowledge Acquisition.兴趣-能力概况:一种知识获取的综合方法。
J Intell. 2022 Jul 16;10(3):43. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030043.
5
Developmental Histories Facilitating the Emergence of Creative Scientific Expertise: The Role of Developed Cognitive Talents, Education, and Social and Cultural Contexts.促进创造性科学专长出现的发展历程:成熟认知才能、教育以及社会文化背景的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 3;12:716529. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716529. eCollection 2021.
6
Understanding educational, occupational, and creative outcomes requires assessing intraindividual differences in abilities and interests.要了解教育、职业和创造性成果,需要评估个体在能力和兴趣方面的差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 21;117(29):16720-16722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009042117. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
Ordinary extraordinary: Elusive group differences in personality and psychological difficulties between STEM-gifted adolescents and their peers.平凡中的非凡:STEM 资优青少年与同龄人在人格和心理困难方面难以捉摸的群体差异。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Mar;91(1):78-100. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12349. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.谁是最耀眼的明星?——一项对顶尖 STEM 研究生 25 年的纵向研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;119(2):390-416. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000239. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
2
When Lightning Strikes Twice: Profoundly Gifted, Profoundly Accomplished.当闪电击中两次:天赋异禀,成就非凡。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;27(7):1004-18. doi: 10.1177/0956797616644735. Epub 2016 May 25.
3
Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable.与男性相比,女性认为职业晋升同样可以实现,但吸引力较小。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12354-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502567112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
5
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
6
Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise.35 年后对早慧青年的研究:揭示数学-科学专长发展的前因。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;1(4):316-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x.
7
Creativity and technical innovation: spatial ability's unique role.创造力和技术创新:空间能力的独特作用。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1831-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797613478615. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
8
Investment and intellect: a review and meta-analysis.投资与智力:综述与元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):841-69. doi: 10.1037/a0030746. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
9
The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies.空间技能的可延展性:一项训练研究的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Mar;139(2):352-402. doi: 10.1037/a0028446. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
10
Cognitive capitalism: the effect of cognitive ability on wealth, as mediated through scientific achievement and economic freedom.认知资本主义:认知能力通过科学成就和经济自由对财富的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):754-63. doi: 10.1177/0956797611407207. Epub 2011 May 2.