Suppr超能文献

与年度空气污染物排放的小时数比较:对估计急性暴露和公共健康风险的影响。

A comparison of hourly with annual air pollutant emissions: Implications for estimating acute exposure and public health risk.

机构信息

a National Center for Environmental Assessment , Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.

b Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards , Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.

出版信息

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 Jul;69(7):848-856. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1593261. Epub 2019 May 22.

Abstract

Health risks from air pollutants are evaluated by comparing chronic (i.e., an average over 1 yr or greater) or acute (typically 1-hr) exposure estimates with chemical- and duration-specific reference values or standards. When estimating long-term pollutant concentrations via exposure modeling, facility-level annual average emission rates are readily available as model inputs for most air pollutants. In contrast, there are far fewer facility-level hour-by-hour emission rates available for many of these same pollutants. In this report, we first analyze hour-by-hour emission rates for total reduced sulfur (TRS) compounds from eight kraft pulp mill operations. This data set is used to demonstrate discrepancies between estimating exposure based on a single TRS emission rate that has been calculated as the mean of all operating hours of the year, as opposed to reported hourly emission rates. A similar analysis is then performed using reported hourly emission rates for sulfur dioxide (SO) and oxides of nitrogen (NO) from three power generating units from a U.S. power plant. Results demonstrate greater variability at kraft pulp mill operations, with ratios of reported hourly to average hourly TRS emissions ranging from less than 1 to greater than 160 during routine facility operations. Thus, if fluctuations in hourly emission rates are not accounted for, over- or underestimates of hourly exposure, and thus acute health risk, may occur. In addition to this analysis, we also demonstrate an additional challenge when assessing health risk based on hourly exposures: the lack of human health reference values based on 1-hr exposures. : Largely due to the lack of emission rate data for many air pollutants, an emission rate (calculated from an annual emission rate) is often used when modeling the potential for acute health risk. We calculated ratios between and emission rates from pulp and paper mills and a U.S. power plant to demonstrate that if not considered, hourly fluctuations in emissions could result in an over- or underestimation of exposure and risk. We also demonstrate the lack of 1-hr human health reference values meant to be protective of the general population, including children.

摘要

通过将慢性(即 1 年或更长时间的平均值)或急性(通常为 1 小时)暴露估计值与特定化学物质和持续时间的参考值或标准进行比较,评估空气污染物对健康的风险。在通过暴露模型估计长期污染物浓度时,设施级别的年平均排放率很容易作为大多数空气污染物的模型输入。相比之下,许多相同的污染物的设施级每小时排放率则要少得多。在本报告中,我们首先分析了来自八个牛皮纸浆厂作业的总还原硫 (TRS) 化合物的每小时排放率。该数据集用于展示基于全年所有运行小时的平均值计算的单个 TRS 排放率来估算暴露值与报告的每小时排放率之间的差异。然后,我们使用来自美国一家发电厂的三个发电装置的二氧化硫 (SO) 和氮氧化物 (NO) 的报告的每小时排放量进行了类似的分析。结果表明牛皮纸浆厂作业的变异性更大,在常规设施运行期间,报告的每小时到平均每小时 TRS 排放量的比值从小于 1 到大于 160 不等。因此,如果不考虑每小时排放率的波动,可能会导致对每小时暴露量的高估或低估,从而导致急性健康风险。除了此分析之外,我们还展示了基于每小时暴露量评估健康风险时面临的另一个挑战:缺乏基于 1 小时暴露量的人类健康参考值。:由于缺乏许多空气污染物的排放率数据,因此在建模急性健康风险时,通常使用排放率(从年排放量计算得出)。我们计算了纸浆和造纸厂以及美国发电厂的 和 排放率之间的比值,以证明如果不考虑,排放的每小时波动可能会导致对暴露量和风险的高估或低估。我们还展示了缺乏旨在保护包括儿童在内的一般人群的 1 小时人类健康参考值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9899/7374520/c5ec0999228b/nihms-1541137-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验