Woodall George M
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005;68(11-12):901-26. doi: 10.1080/15287390590912199.
A number of organizations have developed acute inhalation health reference values, each with (1) a specific purpose, (2) populations to protect, (3) exposure scenarios (accidental releases, workplace, routine excursions of ambient levels), and (4) severity of adverse health effects considered in their development. The first section of this article reviews the existing values from different organizations and describes their purposes and method of development. The second part of the article provides a comparative review of how the values were derived, the critical endpoints considered for each value, the populations being protected by each value, and the potential for use outside of their intended purpose (e.g., Homeland Security, regulatory analysis, etc.). Additionally, an analysis of the acute inhalation reference values that was developed in support of the Office of Air and Radiation's residual risk assessment for hazardous air pollutants is presented and reviewed. The third and final part of the article focuses on the efforts of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop a set of less-than-lifetime reference values, along with a discussion of how that effort fits with the existing sets of values described in the prior sections.
许多组织已经制定了急性吸入健康参考值,每个参考值都具有以下几点:(1)特定目的;(2)要保护的人群;(3)暴露场景(意外释放、工作场所、环境水平的常规波动);以及(4)在制定过程中考虑的不良健康影响的严重程度。本文的第一部分回顾了不同组织的现有参考值,并描述了它们的目的和制定方法。文章的第二部分对这些参考值的推导方式、每个参考值所考虑的关键终点、每个参考值所保护的人群以及在其预期用途之外的潜在用途(例如国土安全、监管分析等)进行了比较性综述。此外,还介绍并审查了为支持空气与辐射办公室对有害空气污染物的残留风险评估而制定的急性吸入参考值分析。文章的第三部分也是最后一部分重点关注美国环境保护局(EPA)制定一套低于终生参考值的工作,同时讨论这项工作如何与前几节中描述的现有参考值集相契合。