Akoto Ralph, Albers Malte, Balke Maurice, Bouillon Bertil, Höher Jürgen
Sports Clinic Cologne at Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Cologne, University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimerstraße 200, D-51109, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Cologne, Germany.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Mar 14;20(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2499-y.
The objective of the study was to compare the results of a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using the press-fit fixation technique for a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft to a standard quadrupled hamstring (HT) graft with interference screw fixation.
A retrospective cohort study with a 12-month follow up provided data for 92 patients. Exclusion criteria were accompanying ligament injuries and contralateral ACL injury. Patients who suffered a graft failure, which was defined as a side-to-side difference of > 3 mm, or infection were rated 'D' according to the IKDC and excluded from further evaluation. Forty-six patients underwent primary ACLR using the press-fit fixation technique for autologous bone QT graft. These patients were matched in terms of age, gender, accompanying meniscus tear and cartilage injury to 46 patients who underwent standard HT graft with interference screw fixation. Patients were evaluated according to the Lachman test, Pivot-Shift test, IKDC score, Tegner score, Rolimeter measurements, one-leg hop test, thigh circumference and donor side morbidity.
No significant differences in Tegner score (p = 0.9), subjective or objective IKDC score (p = 0.9;p = 0.6), knee stability (Lachman Test p = 0.6; Pivot-Shift Test p = 0.4; Side-to-Side Difference p = 0.4), functioning testing (One-Leg Hop Test p = 0.6; Thigh Circumference p = 0.4) or donor side morbidity (p = 0.4) were observed at the follow up. The Lachman test was negative for 85% of the QT group and 83% of the HT group. The Pivot Shift Test was negative for 80% of the QT group and 85% of the HT group. The mean side-to-side difference was 1.6 ± 0 .2mm in both groups. The one-leg hop test revealed a collateral-side jumping distance of 96.2 ± 8.5% for the QT group and 95.5 ± 8.5% for the HT group. The thigh circumference of the injured leg was 98.3 ± 3.0% on the uninjured side in the QT group and 99.7 ± 3.0% in the HT group. A knee walking test resulted in no discomfort for 90% of the QT group and 85% of the HT group. The graft failure rate was 7.3% in the QT group and 9.8% in the HT group.
QT grafts fixated using the press-fit technique are a reliable alternative for primary ACL surgery.
本研究的目的是比较采用压配固定技术的股四头肌腱(QT)移植物与采用干涉螺钉固定的标准四股绳肌(HT)移植物进行初次前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的结果。
一项为期12个月随访的回顾性队列研究为92例患者提供了数据。排除标准为合并韧带损伤和对侧前交叉韧带损伤。移植物失败(定义为两侧差异>3mm)或感染的患者根据国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评级为“D”级,并排除在进一步评估之外。46例患者采用压配固定技术进行自体骨QT移植物的初次ACLR。这些患者在年龄、性别、合并半月板撕裂和软骨损伤方面与46例采用干涉螺钉固定的标准HT移植物患者相匹配。根据Lachman试验、轴移试验、IKDC评分、Tegner评分、旋转测量仪测量、单腿跳跃试验、大腿围度和供体部位发病率对患者进行评估。
随访时,两组在Tegner评分(p = 0.9)、主观或客观IKDC评分(p = 0.9;p = 0.6)、膝关节稳定性(Lachman试验p = 0.6;轴移试验p = 0.4;两侧差异p = 0.4)、功能测试(单腿跳跃试验p = 0.6;大腿围度p = 0.4)或供体部位发病率(p = 0.4)方面均未观察到显著差异。QT组85%的患者Lachman试验为阴性,HT组为83%。QT组80%的患者轴移试验为阴性,HT组为85%。两组的平均两侧差异均为1.6±0.2mm。单腿跳跃试验显示,QT组的侧方跳跃距离为健侧的96.2±8.5%,HT组为95.5±8.5%。QT组患侧大腿围度为健侧的98.3±3.0%,HT组为99.7±3.0%。膝关节行走试验中,QT组90%的患者和HT组85%的患者无不适。QT组的移植物失败率为7.3%,HT组为9.8%。
采用压配技术固定的QT移植物是初次ACLR手术的可靠替代方案。