Clarke Joanna I, Brillanf Nathalie, Antoine Daniel J
Department of Molecular & Clinical Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
J Clin Transl Res. 2017 Feb 12;3(1):199-211. eCollection 2017 Feb 17.
Liver safety biomarkers in current clinical practice are recognized to have certain shortcomings including their representation of general cell death and thus lacking in indicating the specific underlying mechanisms of injury. An informative panel of circulating- and imaging-based biomarkers, will allow a more complete understanding of the processes involved in the complex and multi-cellular disease of drug-induced liver injury; potentially preceding and therefore enabling prediction of disease progression as well as directing appropriate, existing or novel, therapeutic strategies. Several putative liver safety biomarkers are under investigation as discussed throughout this review, informing on a multitude of hepatocellular mechanisms including: early cell death (miR-122), necrosis (HMGB1, K18), apoptosis, (K18), inflammation (HMGB1), mitochondrial damage (GLDH, mtDNA), liver dysfunction (MRI, MSOT) and regeneration (CSF1). These biomarkers also hold translational value to provide important read across between in vitro-in vivo and clinical test systems. However, gaps in our knowledge remain requiring further focussed research and the ultimate qualification of key exploratory biomarkers. this novel multi-modal approach of assessing drug-induced liver injury could potentially enable better patient stratification and enhance treatment strategies. Ultimately, this could reduce unnecessary treatment, also decreasing hospital bed occupancy, whilst ensuring early and accurate identification of patients needing intervention.
当前临床实践中的肝脏安全生物标志物被认为存在某些缺点,包括它们代表的是一般细胞死亡,因此在指示损伤的具体潜在机制方面存在不足。一组基于循环和成像的信息丰富的生物标志物,将有助于更全面地了解药物性肝损伤这种复杂的多细胞疾病所涉及的过程;有可能在疾病进展之前进行预测,从而预测疾病进展,并指导适当的现有或新型治疗策略。正如本综述所讨论的,几种假定的肝脏安全生物标志物正在研究中,它们揭示了多种肝细胞机制,包括:早期细胞死亡(miR-122)、坏死(HMGB1、K18)、凋亡(K18)、炎症(HMGB1)、线粒体损伤(GLDH、mtDNA)、肝功能障碍(MRI、MSOT)和再生(CSF1)。这些生物标志物还具有转化价值,可在体外-体内和临床试验系统之间提供重要的关联信息。然而,我们的知识仍存在差距,需要进一步集中研究以及对关键探索性生物标志物进行最终鉴定。这种评估药物性肝损伤的新型多模式方法可能会实现更好的患者分层并加强治疗策略。最终,这可以减少不必要的治疗,也减少医院床位占用,同时确保早期准确识别需要干预的患者。