• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The 10-Item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for Functional and Cosmetic Rhinoplasty.用于功能性和美容性鼻整形术的 10 项标准化美容和健康鼻部结局调查(SCHNOS)。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):37-42. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1083.
2
Natural History of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey After Rhinoplasty.隆鼻术后标准化鼻部美容和健康结果调查的自然史。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jan;131(1):E116-E123. doi: 10.1002/lary.28831. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey.标准化鼻部美容和健康结局量表的最小临床重要差异。
Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Jul 12;39(8):837-840. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz070.
4
Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey in Japanese (J-SCHNOS).标准化美容与健康鼻部结局调查问卷的日语版(J-SCHNOS)的翻译、文化调适与验证。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Mar;90:114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.013. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
5
Functional Outcomes of Septal Extension Grafting in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: A Cohort Analysis.鼻中隔延伸移植在美容鼻整形术中的功能效果:一项队列分析。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021 May-Jun;23(3):172-179. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0304. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
6
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) in Chinese.中文标准化美容和健康鼻部结局调查(SCHNOS)的翻译、文化适应性调整和验证。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Oct 15;44(11):NP769-NP777. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae159.
7
Analysis of Nasal Obstruction Patterns Following Reductive Rhinoplasty.分析鼻中隔矫正术后的鼻塞模式。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;44(1):122-128. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01484-5. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
8
Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) in Italian.意大利标准美容和健康鼻部结局调查(SCHNOS)的翻译、文化适应性和验证。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Jun;46(3):1351-1359. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02677-7. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
9
Comparison of the Distribution of Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey Scores Between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients.比较有症状和无症状患者的标准化美容和健康鼻部结局调查评分的分布。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;24(4):305-309. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0054. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
The miniature lateral crural strut graft: Efficacy of a novel technique in tip plasty.微型外侧小腿支撑移植物:一种新型尖端整形技术的疗效。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Nov;130(11):2581-2588. doi: 10.1002/lary.28530. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Depressor Septi Transposition on Preventing Tip Droop During Smiling in Tongue-in-Groove Tip Plasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.槽沟式鼻尖整形术中降鼻中隔肌移位对预防微笑时鼻尖下垂的作用:一项随机对照试验
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04966-x.
2
Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of Combined Use of Extended Spreader Graft and Septal Extension Graft.扩展撑开移植物与鼻中隔延长移植物联合使用的美学和功能效果
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;15(4):546. doi: 10.3390/life15040546.
3
Crooked Nose: Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes.歪鼻:美学与功能效果
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):4012-4018. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04765-x. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
4
Comparison of Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcomes Between Patients with Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Normal Individuals.躯体变形障碍患者与正常个体的美容与功能鼻整形术效果比较。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(20):4121-4129. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03961-y. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
Nasal airway obstruction in patients with cleft lip nasal deformity: A systematic review.唇裂鼻畸形患者的鼻气道阻塞:系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 May;92:48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.061. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty versus dorsal hump reduction: a randomized prospective study, functional and aesthetic outcomes.背侧保留式鼻整形术与驼峰减少术:一项随机前瞻性研究,功能与美学结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3655-3669. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08546-8. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
7
Relevance of Self-Consciousness of Appearance on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Rhinoplasty: a 12-Month Follow-up Prospective Study.外貌自觉对初级鼻整形患者满意度的相关性:一项 12 个月前瞻性研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Jun;48(12):2269-2277. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03803-3. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
8
Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Asymmetric Dorsal Preservation for Correction of I-Shaped Crooked Nose Deformity.不对称背侧保留矫正I型歪鼻畸形的功能和美学效果
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Mar;61(1):14-19. doi: 10.4274/tao.2023.2022-12-1. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
9
Invited Discussion on: The Comprehensive Evaluation of the Pinch Deformity Due to Concave Alar Cartilages and its Management.特邀讨论:鼻翼软骨凹陷所致捏持畸形的综合评估及其处理
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2622-2624. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03530-9. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
10
The Difference in Scar-Related Quality of Life in Open Versus Closed Septorhinoplasty.开放式与闭合式鼻中隔成形术中瘢痕相关生活质量的差异
Cureus. 2023 Jun 16;15(6):e40541. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40541. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Practice Guideline: Improving Nasal Form and Function after Rhinoplasty.临床实践指南:改善鼻整形术后的鼻部形态与功能
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Feb;156(2_suppl):S1-S30. doi: 10.1177/0194599816683153.
2
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Facial Plastic Surgery: A Specialty Finally Gets to Go to the PROM.面部整形手术的患者报告结局指标:一个专业领域终于开始采用患者报告结局指标了。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):101. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1429.
3
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty.隆鼻术后患者报告结局指标的系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Apr;274(4):1807-1811. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4359-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
4
Development and Validation of the Expectations of Aesthetic Rhinoplasty Scale.鼻整形美容期望量表的编制与验证
Arch Plast Surg. 2016 Jul;43(4):365-70. doi: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.4.365. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
5
A Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Instrument for Aesthetic and Functional Rhinoplasty: The RHINO Scale.一种用于美容和功能性鼻整形术的综合生活质量评估工具:RHINO量表。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Feb 4;4(2):e611. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000592. eCollection 2016 Feb.
6
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty.隆鼻手术患者面部量表(FACE-Q)的开发与心理测量评估
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;18(1):27-35. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1445.
7
Development and validation of the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17).功能性鼻整形术结果量表17(FROI-17)的开发与验证。
Rhinology. 2014 Dec;52(4):315-9. doi: 10.4193/Rhino13.098.
8
Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction.主观鼻塞严重程度分类系统的建立。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;15(5):358-61. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.344.
9
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.COSMIN 清单用于评估健康状况测量仪器测量性能研究的方法学质量:一项国际 Delphi 研究。
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
10
Evidence supporting functional rhinoplasty or nasal valve repair: A 25-year systematic review.支持功能性鼻整形术或鼻瓣膜修复的证据:一项25年的系统综述。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jul;139(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.02.007.

用于功能性和美容性鼻整形术的 10 项标准化美容和健康鼻部结局调查(SCHNOS)。

The 10-Item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for Functional and Cosmetic Rhinoplasty.

机构信息

Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California.

Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):37-42. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1083.

DOI:10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1083
PMID:28880988
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5833673/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Rhinoplasty is a common operation in which shape and function are intimately related, whether the procedure is cosmetic, functional, or combined in nature. There is currently no properly developed and validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate both functional and cosmetic components of rhinoplasty.

OBJECTIVE

To develop, validate, and field test the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) to evaluate both functional and cosmetic outcomes of rhinoplasty.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Survey development study between October 2016 and April 2017 in a tertiary referral facial plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic. Preoperative and postoperative adult patients undergoing rhinoplasty, whether cosmetic or reconstructive, were included. A fifth group of adult nonrhinoplasty patients (facial cosmetic or reconstructive) were also included for the field test.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Generated and reduced items, psychometric validation measures of the SCHNOS, and differences on scales between groups.

RESULTS

For survey development, a total of 18 patients and 5 experts were interviewed. Of these patients, 5 were male, and 13 were female. Their mean (SD) age was 38 (14.8) years (range, 20-64 years). Field testing included 191 patients (67% were women and the mean [SD] age was 41.5 [15.8] years). A total of 10 items were included after generation, cognitive interviews, and item reduction. The 10 items represent 2 domains: nasal obstruction (first 4 items) and nasal cosmesis (last 6 items). For both domains, Cronbach α was excellent: 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for obstruction and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95) for cosmesis. Exploratory factor analysis using scree plots for each domain showed that the domains are unidimensional in nature with each domain evaluating what it is intended to assess (nasal obstruction and cosmesis). The factor loading estimates were high for all the items, varying from 0.74 to 0.92. Kruskal-Wallis testing showed a significance level of P < .001 when evaluating the difference between groups (preoperative cosmetic, postoperative cosmetic, preoperative functional, postoperative functional, and nonrhinoplasty) for all individual questions, composite scores, and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score. Correlations between the obstruction composite score and the NOSE scores were r = 0.943 (P < .001), which is very strong. The obstruction and cosmesis composite scores were only weakly correlated (r = 0.388; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

We have developed and validated a new PROM to evaluate both functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty patients. The domains of obstruction and cosmesis were found to be internally consistent and unidimensional. The SCHNOS provides a short, validated questionnaire that we recommend for use in all functional or cosmetic rhinoplasty patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

摘要

重要性

隆鼻术是一种常见的手术,其形状和功能密切相关,无论该手术是出于美容、功能还是两者兼顾的目的。目前尚无经过适当开发和验证的患者报告结局测量(PROM)来评估隆鼻术的功能和美容成分。

目的

开发、验证和现场测试标准化美容和健康鼻结局调查(SCHNOS),以评估隆鼻术的功能和美容结果。

设计、地点和参与者:2016 年 10 月至 2017 年 4 月在三级转诊面部整形和重建外科诊所进行的调查开发研究。纳入了接受隆鼻术的成年患者,无论其是否为美容或重建手术。还纳入了第五组非隆鼻术的成年患者(面部美容或重建)进行现场测试。

主要结果和措施

生成和减少项目、SCHNOS 的心理测量验证措施以及组间量表差异。

结果

在调查开发过程中,共有 18 名患者和 5 名专家接受了采访。其中 5 名是男性,13 名是女性。他们的平均(SD)年龄为 38(14.8)岁(范围,20-64 岁)。现场测试包括 191 名患者(67%为女性,平均[SD]年龄为 41.5[15.8]岁)。经过生成、认知访谈和项目缩减后,共纳入 10 个项目。这 10 个项目代表了 2 个领域:鼻阻塞(前 4 个项目)和鼻美容(后 6 个项目)。对于这两个领域,Cronbach α 都非常好:阻塞为 0.94(95%CI,0.92-0.95),美容为 0.94(95%CI,0.93-0.95)。每个领域的探索性因子分析均使用散点图显示,这些领域本质上是单维的,每个领域都评估其旨在评估的内容(鼻阻塞和美容)。所有项目的因子负荷估计值都很高,范围在 0.74 到 0.92 之间。Kruskal-Wallis 检验显示,在评估所有个体问题、综合评分和鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)评分时,术前美容、术后美容、术前功能、术后功能和非隆鼻术组之间存在统计学意义(P<0.001)。阻塞综合评分与 NOSE 评分之间的相关性为 r=0.943(P<0.001),相关性非常强。阻塞和美容综合评分相关性较弱(r=0.388;P<0.001)。

结论和相关性

我们已经开发并验证了一种新的 PROM,用于评估功能和美容性隆鼻术患者。阻塞和美容这两个领域被发现具有内部一致性和单维性。SCHNOS 提供了一个简短的、经过验证的问卷,我们建议在所有功能或美容性隆鼻术患者中使用。

证据水平

无。