• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

音节数量对阅读中跳词现象的影响再探。

The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading revisited.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):616-621. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01590-0.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-019-01590-0
PMID:30877634
Abstract

Fitzsimmons and Drieghe (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 736-741, 2011) showed that a monosyllabic word was skipped more often than a disyllabic word during reading. This finding was interpreted as evidence that syllabic information was extracted from the parafovea early enough to influence word skipping. In the present, large-scale replication of this study, in which we additionally measured the reading, vocabulary, and spelling abilities of the participants, the effect of number of syllables on word skipping was not significant. Moreover, a Bayesian analysis indicated strong evidence for the absence of the effect. The individual differences analyses replicate previous observations showing that spelling ability uniquely predicts word skipping (but not fixation times) because better spellers skip more often. The results indicate that high-quality lexical representations allow the system to reach an advanced stage in the word-recognition process of the parafoveal word early enough to influence the decision of whether or not to skip the word, but this decision is not influenced by number of syllables.

摘要

菲茨西蒙斯和德里格(Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,18,736-741,2011)表明,在阅读过程中,单音节词比双音节词更容易被跳过。这一发现被解释为音节信息从视副区中被提取出来,足以影响单词跳过的证据。在目前这项大规模的重复研究中,我们还测量了参与者的阅读、词汇和拼写能力,音节数量对单词跳过的影响并不显著。此外,贝叶斯分析表明,该效应不存在的证据非常有力。个体差异分析复制了之前的观察结果,表明拼写能力可以唯一地预测单词跳过(而不是固定时间),因为拼写能力更好的人跳过的频率更高。结果表明,高质量的词汇表征允许系统在视副区单词的单词识别过程中尽早进入高级阶段,从而影响是否跳过单词的决策,但该决策不受音节数量的影响。

相似文献

1
The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading revisited.音节数量对阅读中跳词现象的影响再探。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):616-621. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01590-0.
2
The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading.音节数量对阅读时跳词的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):736-41. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0105-x.
3
Reading skill and word skipping: Implications for visual and linguistic accounts of word skipping.阅读技巧与跳读:对跳读的视觉及语言解释的启示
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1923-8. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000156. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
4
Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.周边视野预视优势受熟练读者词汇表征精度的调节。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):219-32. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000017. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
5
Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading.拼写能力能够有选择性地预测非间隔文本阅读中干扰的程度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Sep;43(9):1612-1628. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000425. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Individual differences in spelling ability influence phonological processing during visual word recognition.拼写能力的个体差异会影响视觉单词识别过程中的语音处理。
Cognition. 2019 Jun;187:139-149. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
7
A Rational Model of Word Skipping in Reading: Ideal Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information.阅读中词语跳过的合理模型:视觉和语言信息的理想整合。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;12(1):387-401. doi: 10.1111/tops.12485. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
8
Word skipping: Effects of word length, predictability, spelling and reading skill.词跳读:词长、可预测性、拼写和阅读技能的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jan;71(1):250-259. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310264.
9
Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.单词识别的神经关联:自然阅读与快速序列视觉呈现的系统比较
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Sep;28(9):1374-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00977. Epub 2016 May 11.
10
Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.重读阅读过程中的眼动与跳读现象。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):954-9. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.954.

引用本文的文献

1
Word length and frequency effects in natural Chinese reading: Evidence for character representations in lexical identification.汉语自然阅读中的词长与频率效应:词汇识别中汉字表征的证据
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Oct 6;78(7):17470218241281798. doi: 10.1177/17470218241281798.
2
Predictability effects and parafoveal processing of compound words in natural Chinese reading.自然汉语阅读中复合词的可预测性效应和视副眼加工。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Jan;75(1):18-29. doi: 10.1177/17470218211048193. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
The role of orthographic neighbourhood effects in lateralized lexical decision: a replication study and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Word skipping: Effects of word length, predictability, spelling and reading skill.词跳读:词长、可预测性、拼写和阅读技能的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jan;71(1):250-259. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310264.
2
Spelling ability selectively predicts the magnitude of disruption in unspaced text reading.拼写能力能够有选择性地预测非间隔文本阅读中干扰的程度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Sep;43(9):1612-1628. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000425. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
3
Skilled adult readers activate the meanings of high-frequency words using phonology: Evidence from eye tracking.
正字法邻域效应在词汇判断偏侧化中的作用:一项重复研究与元分析
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 28;9:e11266. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11266. eCollection 2021.
4
Individuals with dyslexia use a different visual sampling strategy to read text.阅读障碍者使用不同的视觉采样策略来阅读文本。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84945-9.
5
Parafoveal degradation during reading reduces preview costs only when it is not perceptually distinct.阅读过程中的中央凹旁视退化仅在其在感知上不明显时才会降低预视成本。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Feb;74(2):254-276. doi: 10.1177/1747021820959661. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements.拼写能力影响阅读过程中的早期字母编码:来自回扫眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):135-149. doi: 10.1177/1747021820949150. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
熟练的成年读者利用语音激活高频词汇的含义:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):334-346. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0661-4.
4
Semantic preview benefit in English: Individual differences in the extraction and use of parafoveal semantic information.英文中语义预视的益处:副中央凹语义信息提取与使用中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jun;42(6):837-54. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000212. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.周边视野预视优势受熟练读者词汇表征精度的调节。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):219-32. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000017. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
6
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
7
Parafoveal processing in reading.阅读中的副中央凹加工
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):5-35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2.
8
The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading.音节数量对阅读时跳词的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):736-41. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0105-x.
9
Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming.熟练读者的词汇精度:掩蔽邻居启动中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 May;139(2):299-318. doi: 10.1037/a0018366.
10
Phonology is fundamental in skilled reading: evidence from ERPs.音系学在熟练阅读中起着基础作用:来自 ERP 的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Feb;17(1):95-100. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.95.