• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正字法邻域效应在词汇判断偏侧化中的作用:一项重复研究与元分析

The role of orthographic neighbourhood effects in lateralized lexical decision: a replication study and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Parker Adam J, Egan Ciara, Grant Jack H, Harte Sophie, Hudson Brad T, Woodhead Zoe V J

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxon, United Kingdom.

School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2021 Apr 28;9:e11266. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11266. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.11266
PMID:33986993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8088209/
Abstract

The effect of orthographic neighbourhood size (N) on lexical decision reaction time differs when words are presented in the left or right visual fields. Evidence suggests a facilitatory N effect (i.e., faster reaction times for words with larger neighbourhoods) in the left visual field. However, the N effect in the right visual field remains controversial: it may have a weaker facilitative role or it may even be inhibitory. In a pre-registered online experiment, we replicated the interaction between N and visual field and provided support for an inhibitory N effect in the right visual field. We subsequently conducted a pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the available evidence and determine the direction of N effects across visual fields. Based on the evidence, it would seem the effect is inhibitory in the right visual field. Furthermore, the size of the N effect is considerably smaller in the right visual field. Both studies revealed considerable heterogeneity between participants and studies, and we consider the implications of this for future work.

摘要

当单词呈现于左视野或右视野时,拼字邻域大小(N)对词汇判断反应时间的影响有所不同。有证据表明,在左视野中存在促进性的N效应(即邻域较大的单词反应时间更快)。然而,右视野中的N效应仍存在争议:它可能具有较弱的促进作用,甚至可能是抑制性的。在一项预先注册的在线实验中,我们重复了N与视野之间的相互作用,并为右视野中的抑制性N效应提供了支持。随后,我们进行了一项预先注册的系统评价和荟萃分析,以综合现有证据并确定不同视野中N效应的方向。基于这些证据,右视野中的效应似乎是抑制性的。此外,右视野中N效应的大小要小得多。两项研究均揭示了参与者和研究之间存在相当大的异质性,我们考虑了这对未来工作的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/c2246cf88afe/peerj-09-11266-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/75d7a98aa90c/peerj-09-11266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/ffc45682dd92/peerj-09-11266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/384683c97909/peerj-09-11266-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/5513946136db/peerj-09-11266-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/c2246cf88afe/peerj-09-11266-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/75d7a98aa90c/peerj-09-11266-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/ffc45682dd92/peerj-09-11266-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/384683c97909/peerj-09-11266-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/5513946136db/peerj-09-11266-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a047/8088209/c2246cf88afe/peerj-09-11266-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of orthographic neighbourhood effects in lateralized lexical decision: a replication study and meta-analysis.正字法邻域效应在词汇判断偏侧化中的作用:一项重复研究与元分析
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 28;9:e11266. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11266. eCollection 2021.
2
[The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].[正字法可视化对书面文字识别的影响]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2001 Mar;55(1):1-23.
3
Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors.词汇竞争在左半球得到增强:来自不同类型正字法邻接词的证据。
Brain Lang. 2008 Jun;105(3):199-210. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
4
Orthographic neighborhood effects during lateralized lexical decision are abolished with bilateral presentation.双侧呈现时,侧化词汇判断过程中的正字法邻域效应消失。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 May;48(5):481-496. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000997. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
List constituency and orthographic and phonological processing: a shift to high familiarity words from low familiarity words.列表成分与正字法和语音处理:从低熟悉度单词向高熟悉度单词的转变。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Dec;65:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
6
Lateralized reading in the healthy brain: A behavioral and computational study on the nature of the visual field effect.大脑的侧化阅读:关于视野效应本质的行为与计算研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Feb 10;180:108468. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108468. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
7
The effect of orthographic uniqueness and deviation points on lexical decisions: evidence from unilateral and bilateral-redundant presentations.正字法独特性和偏差点对词汇判断的影响:来自单侧和双侧冗余呈现的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Feb;56(2):287-307. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000341.
8
Right visual field advantage for lexical decision dependent on stimulus size and visibility: Evidence for an early processing account of hemispheric asymmetry.右视野在词汇判断上的优势取决于刺激大小和可见度:对偏侧化的早期加工解释的证据。
Laterality. 2021 Sep;26(5):539-563. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2020.1856126. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.评估视觉单词识别的分割加工模型:正字法邻域大小的影响。
Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):312-20. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00164-0.
10
When phonology fails: orthographic neighbourhood effects in dyslexia.当语音学失效时:阅读障碍中的正字法邻域效应
Brain Lang. 2006 Mar;96(3):318-29. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages.吉瓦尔:一个包含40种语言的词邻域度量的数据库和计算器。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Feb 19;57(3):98. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02612-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the reliability of an online behavioural laterality battery: A pre-registered study.评估在线行为偏侧性测试工具的信度:一项预先注册的研究。
Laterality. 2021 Jul;26(4):359-397. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2020.1859526. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
2
Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements.拼写能力影响阅读过程中的早期字母编码:来自回扫眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):135-149. doi: 10.1177/1747021820949150. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder.
潜伏在我们中间的大猩猩:一个在线行为实验构建器。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):388-407. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x.
4
The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading revisited.音节数量对阅读中跳词现象的影响再探。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):616-621. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01590-0.
5
Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS).用于评估横断面研究质量的批判性评价工具(AXIS)的开发。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 8;6(12):e011458. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458.
6
Online psychophysics: reaction time effects in cognitive experiments.在线心理物理学:认知实验中的反应时间效应
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1241-1260. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0783-4.
7
Reaction time effects in lab- versus Web-based research: Experimental evidence.实验室研究与基于网络的研究中的反应时间效应:实验证据。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1718-1724. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0678-9.
8
SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English.SUBTLEX-UK:一个全新且经过改进的英式英语词汇频率数据库。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(6):1176-90. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
9
Lexical quality and eye movements: individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers.词汇质量与眼动:成年熟练读者知觉广度的个体差异
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(4):703-27. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.826258. Epub 2013 Aug 25.
10
Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming.并非所有熟练读者都能破解密码:掩蔽形式启动中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jan;38(1):152-63. doi: 10.1037/a0024953. Epub 2011 Aug 29.