Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Maricopa Agricultural Center, University of Arizona, Maricopa, AZ 85138, USA.
Environ Res. 2019 May;172:616-629. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.050. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
Questions related to the safety of alternative water sources, such as recycled water or reclaimed water (including grey water, produced water, return flows, and recycled wastewater), for produce production have been largely un-explored at the detail warranted for protection of public health. Additionally, recent outbreaks of Escherichia coli (E. coli) in fresh produce, in which agricultural water was suspected as the source, coupled with heightened media coverage, have elevated fruit and vegetable safety into the forefront of public attention. Exacerbating these concerns, new Federal regulations released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as part of implementation of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), require testing of agricultural water quality for generic E. coli. Here, we present a review of water quality criteria - including surface water, groundwater recreational water, and water reuse - in an attempt to better understand implications of new FDA regulations on irrigated produce. In addition, a Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) was conducted to estimate risks from pathogen contamination of food crops eaten fresh under the context of FDA regulations to provide perspective on current water reuse regulations across the country. Results indicate that irrigation water containing 126 CFU/100 mL of E. coli correspond to a risk of GI illness (diarrhea) of 9 cases in 100,000,000 persons (a 0.000009% risk) for subsurface irrigation, 1.1 cases in 100,000 persons (a 0.0011% risk) for furrow irrigation, and 1.1 cases in 1000 persons (a 0.11% risk) for sprinkler irrigation of lettuce. In comparison to metrics in states that currently regulate the use of recycled water for irrigation of food crops eaten fresh, the FDA FSMA water quality metrics are less stringent and therefore the use of recycled water presents a reduced risk to consumers than the FDA regulations. These findings, while limited to a one-time exposure event of lettuce irrigated with water meeting FSMA water quality regulations, highlight the need for additional assessments to determine if the scientific-basis of the regulation is protective of public health.
有关替代水源(例如再生水或回收水,包括灰水、生产水、回流和回收废水)用于农产品生产的安全性问题,在保护公众健康方面,其详细程度还远未得到充分探讨。此外,最近在新鲜农产品中爆发的大肠杆菌(E. coli)疫情,其中农业用水被怀疑是源头,再加上媒体的大量报道,使水果和蔬菜的安全性成为公众关注的焦点。更糟糕的是,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)作为实施 FDA 食品安全现代化法案(FSMA)的一部分发布的新联邦法规要求对农业用水进行大肠杆菌通用测试。在这里,我们回顾了水质标准 - 包括地表水、地下水、娱乐用水和水再利用 - 试图更好地了解新 FDA 法规对灌溉农产品的影响。此外,进行了定量微生物风险评估(QMRA),以根据 FDA 法规评估食用新鲜食品的农作物受到病原体污染的风险,为了解全国当前的水再利用法规提供了视角。结果表明,含有 126 CFU/100 毫升大肠杆菌的灌溉用水对应于地下水灌溉时每 1 亿人中 9 例胃肠道疾病(腹泻)的风险(0.000009%的风险),沟灌时为 10 万人中有 1.1 例(0.0011%的风险),喷灌时为 1000 人中 1.1 例(0.11%的风险)。与目前规范用于灌溉新鲜食用食物的再生水的州的指标相比,FDA FSMA 水质指标较为宽松,因此与 FDA 法规相比,使用再生水对消费者的风险较小。这些发现虽然仅限于用符合 FSMA 水质标准的水灌溉生菜的一次性暴露事件,但强调需要进行更多评估,以确定该法规的科学依据是否能保护公众健康。