• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较蛋氨酸硒和 S-腺苷蛋氨酸预防胆汁淤积性肝损伤的作用。

Comparison between the effects of selenomethionine and S-adenosylmethionine in preventing cholestasis-induced rat liver damage.

机构信息

Clinic for Gastroenterology, Clinical Center Niš, 18000, Niš, Serbia.

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Zorana Đinđića 81, 18000, Niš, Serbia.

出版信息

Amino Acids. 2019 May;51(5):795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00726-019-02716-3. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00726-019-02716-3
PMID:30879149
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate whether two methionine-related compounds, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), and selenomethionine (SM), could lessen liver damage induced by regurgitated bile in a model of rat bile duct ligation (BDL). Hepatoprotective potentials of S-adenosylmethionine and selenomethionine were estimated based on the changes of serum liver damage parameters (aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase and lactate dehydrogenase activity, and bilirubin concentration), tissue oxidative [xanthine oxidase (XO) and catalase activity, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels] and inflammatory [tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-α) concentration] parameters, and morphological liver tissue alterations that follow cholestasis. The treatment regimens proved themselves able to prevent significant liver damage induced by cholestasis. Both SAM and SM decreased XO activity and TBARS levels and increased catalase activity, while only SM significantly reduced TNF-α concentration. Morphological changes related to bile-induced liver damage were also found to be partially diminished by SAM and SM. In view of the mechanisms of action of the two tested methionine-derived compounds, one might say that SM predominantly acted as an antioxidant, while SAM exerted its activity by potentially modulating different gene expression and protein structures. It is also worth mentioning that this is the first study (to the best of our knowledge) that dealt with the effects of SM on BDL-induced liver injury in rats and of the findings that speak favorably of this powerful antioxidant.

摘要

我们旨在评估两种蛋氨酸相关化合物,S-腺苷蛋氨酸(SAM)和硒蛋氨酸(SM),是否可以减轻胆肠吻合术(BDL)模型中胆汁反流引起的肝损伤。根据血清肝损伤参数(转氨酶、碱性磷酸酶、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶和乳酸脱氢酶活性以及胆红素浓度)、组织氧化[黄嘌呤氧化酶(XO)和过氧化氢酶活性、硫代巴比妥酸反应物质(TBARS)水平]和炎症[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)浓度]参数以及胆汁淤积后肝组织形态学改变,评估 S-腺苷蛋氨酸和硒蛋氨酸的肝保护潜力。治疗方案证明能够预防由胆汁淤积引起的显著肝损伤。SAM 和 SM 均降低了 XO 活性和 TBARS 水平,并增加了过氧化氢酶活性,而只有 SM 显著降低了 TNF-α 浓度。SAM 和 SM 还部分减轻了与胆汁诱导的肝损伤相关的形态学变化。鉴于两种测试的蛋氨酸衍生化合物的作用机制,可以说 SM 主要作为抗氧化剂发挥作用,而 SAM 通过潜在调节不同基因表达和蛋白质结构发挥其活性。值得一提的是,这是第一项(据我们所知)研究 SM 对 BDL 诱导的大鼠肝损伤的影响,以及支持这种强大的抗氧化剂的发现。

相似文献

1
Comparison between the effects of selenomethionine and S-adenosylmethionine in preventing cholestasis-induced rat liver damage.比较蛋氨酸硒和 S-腺苷蛋氨酸预防胆汁淤积性肝损伤的作用。
Amino Acids. 2019 May;51(5):795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00726-019-02716-3. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
2
The effects of Nigella sativa on bile duct ligation induced-liver injury in rats.黑种草子对胆管结扎诱导的大鼠肝损伤的影响。
Cell Biochem Funct. 2010 Jan;28(1):83-8. doi: 10.1002/cbf.1624.
3
The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on oxidative stress level and DNase activity in rat liver after bile duct ligation.熊去氧胆酸对胆管结扎大鼠肝脏氧化应激水平和 DNA 酶活性的影响。
Drug Chem Toxicol. 2013 Apr;36(2):141-8. doi: 10.3109/01480545.2012.658919. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
4
The NF-kappaB inhibitors attenuate hepatic injury in bile duct ligated rats.核因子-κB抑制剂可减轻胆管结扎大鼠的肝损伤。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2006 Aug;22(8):655-63. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1721-9. Epub 2006 Jul 8.
5
Opioid system blockade decreases collagenase activity and improves liver injury in a rat model of cholestasis.阿片类系统阻断可降低胆汁淤积大鼠模型中的胶原酶活性并改善肝损伤。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;22(3):406-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04260.x.
6
Homocysteine alterations in experimental cholestasis and its subsequent cirrhosis.实验性胆汁淤积及其继发肝硬化时同型半胱氨酸的变化
Life Sci. 2005 Apr 8;76(21):2497-512. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.12.009.
7
Magnesium protects against bile duct ligation-induced liver injury in male Wistar rats.镁可保护雄性Wistar大鼠免受胆管结扎诱导的肝损伤。
Magnes Res. 2015 Jan-Mar;28(1):32-45. doi: 10.1684/mrh.2015.0380.
8
Effect of rosuvastatin on cholestasis-induced hepatic injury in rat livers.瑞舒伐他汀对胆汁淤积性肝损伤大鼠肝脏的影响。
J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(2):89-94. doi: 10.1002/jbt.20315.
9
Effects of S-adenosyl-L-methionine and interferon-alpha2b on liver damage induced by bile duct ligation in rats.S-腺苷-L-甲硫氨酸和干扰素-α2b对大鼠胆管结扎所致肝损伤的影响。
J Appl Toxicol. 1998 Mar-Apr;18(2):143-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1263(199803/04)18:2<143::aid-jat485>3.0.co;2-p.
10
S-Adenosylmethionine attenuates bile duct early warm ischemia reperfusion injury after rat liver transplantation.S-腺苷甲硫氨酸减轻大鼠肝移植后胆管早期热缺血再灌注损伤。
Mol Immunol. 2018 Mar;95:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatoprotective agents in the management of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: current knowledge and prospects.妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症治疗中的肝保护剂:当前认知与前景
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 31;14:1218432. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1218432. eCollection 2023.
2
L. and the Underlying Molecular Mechanisms for Its Choleretic, Cholagogue, and Regenerative Properties.L. 及其利胆、促胆汁分泌和再生特性的潜在分子机制。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Jun 15;16(6):887. doi: 10.3390/ph16060887.
3
Metabolism and Anticancer Mechanisms of Selocompounds: Comprehensive Review.
硒化合物的代谢与抗癌机制:全面综述。
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2023 Aug;201(8):3626-3644. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03467-1. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Therapeutic effect of adenosylmethionine on viral hepatitis and related factors inducing diseas.腺苷甲硫氨酸对病毒性肝炎的治疗作用及致病相关因素
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Aug 15;13(8):9485-9494. eCollection 2021.
5
Toxicology and pharmacology of synthetic organoselenium compounds: an update.合成有机硒化合物的毒理学和药理学:最新进展。
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Apr;95(4):1179-1226. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03003-5. Epub 2021 Apr 1.