Suppr超能文献

惊讶-好奇-困惑:认识情感与知识探索。

Surprised-curious-confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences.

出版信息

Emotion. 2020 Jun;20(4):625-641. doi: 10.1037/emo0000578. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

Abstract

Some epistemic emotions, such as surprise and curiosity, have attracted increasing scientific attention, whereas others, such as confusion, have yet to receive the attention they deserve. In addition, little is known about the relations between these emotions, their joint antecedents and outcomes, and how they differ from other emotions prompted during learning and knowledge generation (e.g., achievement emotions). In 3 studies (s = 102, 373, 125) using a trivia task with immediate feedback, we examined within-person interrelations, antecedents, and effects of 3 epistemic emotions (surprise, curiosity, and confusion). Studies 2 and 3 additionally included 2 achievement emotions (pride and shame). Using multilevel modeling to disentangle within- and between-person variance, we found that achievement emotions were associated with accuracy (i.e., correctness of the answer), whereas epistemic emotions were related to high-confidence errors (i.e., incorrect answers a person was confident in) generating cognitive incongruity. Furthermore, as compared with achievement emotions, epistemic emotions were more strongly and positively related to subsequent knowledge exploration. Specifically, surprise and curiosity were positive predictors of exploration. Confusion had positive predictive effects on exploration which were significant in Studies 1 and 3 but not in Study 2, suggesting that the effects of confusion are less stable and need to be investigated further. Apart from the findings for confusion, the results were fully robust across all 3 studies. They shed light on the distinct origins and outcomes of epistemic emotions. Directions for future research and practical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

有些认知情绪,如惊讶和好奇,已经引起了越来越多的科学关注,而其他情绪,如困惑,还没有得到应有的重视。此外,人们对这些情绪之间的关系、它们共同的前因和后果以及它们与学习和知识生成过程中(如成就情绪)中引发的其他情绪有何不同知之甚少。在 3 项研究(s=102、373、125)中,我们使用即时反馈的琐事任务,研究了 3 种认知情绪(惊讶、好奇和困惑)的个体内相互关系、前因和效果。研究 2 和 3 还包括 2 种成就情绪(骄傲和羞耻)。使用多层次建模来区分个体内和个体间的差异,我们发现成就情绪与准确性(即答案的正确性)相关,而认知情绪与高置信错误(即一个人有信心的错误答案)相关,产生认知不一致。此外,与成就情绪相比,认知情绪与后续知识探索的关系更为强烈和积极。具体来说,惊讶和好奇是探索的积极预测因素。困惑对探索有积极的预测效果,在研究 1 和 3 中显著,但在研究 2 中不显著,这表明困惑的影响不太稳定,需要进一步研究。除了困惑的结果外,所有 3 项研究的结果都是完全可靠的。它们揭示了认知情绪的不同起源和结果。讨论了未来研究和实际应用的方向。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验