• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

惊讶-好奇-困惑:认识情感与知识探索。

Surprised-curious-confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences.

出版信息

Emotion. 2020 Jun;20(4):625-641. doi: 10.1037/emo0000578. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1037/emo0000578
PMID:30883147
Abstract

Some epistemic emotions, such as surprise and curiosity, have attracted increasing scientific attention, whereas others, such as confusion, have yet to receive the attention they deserve. In addition, little is known about the relations between these emotions, their joint antecedents and outcomes, and how they differ from other emotions prompted during learning and knowledge generation (e.g., achievement emotions). In 3 studies (s = 102, 373, 125) using a trivia task with immediate feedback, we examined within-person interrelations, antecedents, and effects of 3 epistemic emotions (surprise, curiosity, and confusion). Studies 2 and 3 additionally included 2 achievement emotions (pride and shame). Using multilevel modeling to disentangle within- and between-person variance, we found that achievement emotions were associated with accuracy (i.e., correctness of the answer), whereas epistemic emotions were related to high-confidence errors (i.e., incorrect answers a person was confident in) generating cognitive incongruity. Furthermore, as compared with achievement emotions, epistemic emotions were more strongly and positively related to subsequent knowledge exploration. Specifically, surprise and curiosity were positive predictors of exploration. Confusion had positive predictive effects on exploration which were significant in Studies 1 and 3 but not in Study 2, suggesting that the effects of confusion are less stable and need to be investigated further. Apart from the findings for confusion, the results were fully robust across all 3 studies. They shed light on the distinct origins and outcomes of epistemic emotions. Directions for future research and practical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

有些认知情绪,如惊讶和好奇,已经引起了越来越多的科学关注,而其他情绪,如困惑,还没有得到应有的重视。此外,人们对这些情绪之间的关系、它们共同的前因和后果以及它们与学习和知识生成过程中(如成就情绪)中引发的其他情绪有何不同知之甚少。在 3 项研究(s=102、373、125)中,我们使用即时反馈的琐事任务,研究了 3 种认知情绪(惊讶、好奇和困惑)的个体内相互关系、前因和效果。研究 2 和 3 还包括 2 种成就情绪(骄傲和羞耻)。使用多层次建模来区分个体内和个体间的差异,我们发现成就情绪与准确性(即答案的正确性)相关,而认知情绪与高置信错误(即一个人有信心的错误答案)相关,产生认知不一致。此外,与成就情绪相比,认知情绪与后续知识探索的关系更为强烈和积极。具体来说,惊讶和好奇是探索的积极预测因素。困惑对探索有积极的预测效果,在研究 1 和 3 中显著,但在研究 2 中不显著,这表明困惑的影响不太稳定,需要进一步研究。除了困惑的结果外,所有 3 项研究的结果都是完全可靠的。它们揭示了认知情绪的不同起源和结果。讨论了未来研究和实际应用的方向。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Surprised-curious-confused: Epistemic emotions and knowledge exploration.惊讶-好奇-困惑:认识情感与知识探索。
Emotion. 2020 Jun;20(4):625-641. doi: 10.1037/emo0000578. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
2
Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions.惊讶、好奇和困惑促进知识探索:认知情绪产生强大影响的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 12;10:2474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474. eCollection 2019.
3
Shared and unique features of epistemic emotions: Awe, surprise, curiosity, interest, confusion, and boredom.认知情绪的共同和独特特征:敬畏、惊讶、好奇、兴趣、困惑和无聊。
Emotion. 2024 Jun;24(4):1029-1048. doi: 10.1037/emo0001314. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
4
From relief to surprise: Dual control of epistemic curiosity in the human brain.从缓解到惊喜:人类大脑中认识好奇心的双重控制。
Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:490-500. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.038. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Curiosity, Surprise, and the Recall of Tobacco-Related Health Information in Adolescents.好奇心、惊讶和青少年对与烟草相关健康信息的回忆。
J Health Commun. 2023 Jul 3;28(7):446-457. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2224254. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
6
Predicting vs. guessing: the role of confidence for pupillometric markers of curiosity and surprise.预测与猜测:瞳孔测量好奇心和惊讶的标记的置信度的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Jun;36(4):731-740. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2029733. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
7
Epistemic beliefs as predictors of epistemic emotions: Extending a theoretical model.认知信念作为认知情绪的预测因子:理论模型的扩展。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2018 Sep;88(3):410-427. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12191. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
8
Magic Curiosity Arousing Tricks (MagicCATs): A novel stimulus collection to induce epistemic emotions.魔术好奇心激发技巧(MagicCATs):一种新颖的刺激物集合,可诱发认知情绪。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):188-215. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01431-2.
9
Eye movements reveal epistemic curiosity in human observers.眼动揭示了人类观察者的认知好奇心。
Vision Res. 2015 Dec;117:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
10
Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: the Epistemically-Related Emotion Scales.认知活动中的情绪测量:认知相关情绪量表
Cogn Emot. 2017 Sep;31(6):1268-1276. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling the arousal potential of epistemic emotions using Bayesian information gain: a framework for inquiry cycles driven by free energy fluctuations.使用贝叶斯信息增益对认知情绪的唤醒潜力进行建模:一个由自由能波动驱动的探究循环框架。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 13;16:1438080. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1438080. eCollection 2025.
2
Curiosity across the adult lifespan: Age-related differences in state and trait curiosity.成年期的好奇心:状态好奇心和特质好奇心的年龄相关差异。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0320600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320600. eCollection 2025.
3
Unveiling the enigma of blind box impulse buying curiosity: The moderating role of price consciousness.
揭开盲盒冲动购买好奇心之谜:价格意识的调节作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 2;10(24):e40564. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40564. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.
4
The magic, memory, and curiosity fMRI dataset of people viewing magic tricks.人观看魔术表演时的 fMRI 数据集:魔力、记忆与好奇心。
Sci Data. 2024 Oct 1;11(1):1063. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03675-5.
5
Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts: New insights and future directions for research and practice.从教育环境中的错误和失败中学习:研究与实践的新见解及未来方向。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2025 Mar;95(1):197-218. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12716. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
6
The curious physician: exploring the role of curiosity in professionalism, patient care, and well-being.好奇的医生:探索好奇心在专业精神、患者护理和健康中的作用。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2392887. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2392887. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
7
Systematic Curiosity as an Integrative Tool for Human Flourishing: A Conceptual Review and Framework.作为促进人类繁荣的综合工具的系统性好奇心:概念性综述与框架
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1876-1894. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09856-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
The prevalence of health risk behavior engagement among grade 4 to 7 learners in primary schools: A phase one needs analysis.小学四年级至七年级学生健康风险行为参与情况:第一阶段需求分析
J Public Health Afr. 2023 Nov 30;14(11):2328. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2023.2328.
9
Effects of two types of numerical problems on the emotions experienced in adults and in 9-year-old children.两种类型的数字问题对成年人和 9 岁儿童所体验到的情绪的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0289027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289027. eCollection 2023.
10
The Human Affectome.人类情感组
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Mar;158:105450. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450. Epub 2023 Nov 3.