Suppr超能文献

常规询问不良童年经历的证据基础:范围综述。

The evidence base for routine enquiry into adverse childhood experiences: A scoping review.

机构信息

Public Health Collaborating Unit, College of Human Sciences, BIHMR, Bangor University, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK.

Public Health Collaborating Unit, College of Human Sciences, BIHMR, Bangor University, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK; Policy and International Development Directorate, a World Health Organization Collaboration Centre on Investment for Health and Well-being, Public Health Wales, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2019 May;91:131-146. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs; e.g., maltreatment, household dysfunction) is associated with a multiplicity of negative outcomes throughout the life course. Consequently, increasing interest is being paid to the application of routine enquiry for ACEs to enable identification and direct interventions to mitigate their harms.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the evidence base for retrospective routine enquiry in adults for ACEs, including feasibility and acceptability amongst practitioners, service user acceptability and outcomes from implementation.

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature was conducted, drawing upon three databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO) and manual searching and citation tracking. Searches included studies published from 1997 until end of April 2018 examining enquiry into ACEs, or the feasibility/acceptability of such enquiry across any setting. All included studies presented empirical findings, with studies focusing on screening for current adversities excluded.

RESULTS

Searches retrieved 380 articles, of which 15 met the eligibility criteria. A narrative approach to synthesize the data was utilized. Four studies examined practitioner feasibility and/or acceptability of enquiry, three reported service user acceptability and six studies implemented routine ACE enquiry (not mutually exclusive categories). Further, eight studies explored current practice and practitioner attitudes towards ACE enquiry.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited literature was found providing evidence for outcomes from enquiry. No studies examined impacts on service user health or service utilization. Few studies explored feasibility or acceptability to inform the application of routine ACE enquiry. The implementation of routine ACE enquiry therefore needs careful consideration. Focus should remain on evaluating developing models of ACE enquiry to advance understanding of its impact.

摘要

背景

接触不良的儿童经历(ACE;例如,虐待、家庭功能障碍)与整个生命周期中的多种负面后果有关。因此,人们越来越关注对 ACE 的常规询问的应用,以识别和直接干预减轻其危害。

目的

探索在成年人中进行 ACE 回顾性常规询问的证据基础,包括从业者的可行性和可接受性、服务使用者的可接受性以及实施结果。

方法

对文献进行了范围审查,利用了三个数据库(CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO)以及手动搜索和引文跟踪。搜索包括 1997 年至 2018 年 4 月底期间发表的研究,研究内容为对 ACE 的询问,或在任何环境下进行此类询问的可行性/可接受性。所有纳入的研究都提出了实证发现,排除了仅关注当前逆境筛查的研究。

结果

搜索共检索到 380 篇文章,其中 15 篇符合入选标准。采用叙述方法对数据进行综合。四项研究检验了从业者询问的可行性和/或可接受性,三项研究报告了服务使用者的可接受性,六项研究实施了常规 ACE 询问(非互斥类别)。此外,八项研究探讨了当前实践和从业者对 ACE 询问的态度。

结论

研究发现的文献有限,提供了询问结果的证据。没有研究考察询问对服务使用者健康或服务利用的影响。很少有研究探讨可行性或可接受性,以告知常规 ACE 询问的应用。因此,需要仔细考虑常规 ACE 询问的实施。重点应继续放在评估 ACE 询问的发展模式上,以提高对其影响的理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验