Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Førde, Norway.
Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 18;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0706-z.
Continuity of cardiac care after hospital discharge is a priority, especially as healthcare systems become increasingly complex and fragmented. There are few available instruments to measure continuity of cardiac care, especially from the patient perspective. The aim of this study was (1) to translate and adapt the Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire (HCCQ) to conditions in Norway, and (2) to determine its psychometric properties in self-report format administered to patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
The HCCQ was first translated into Norwegian from the original English version, following a widely used cross-cultural adaptation process. Data were collected before hospital discharge and in a follow-up after 2 months. To assess psychometric properties, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed and three aspects of construct validity were evaluated: structural validity, hypotheses testing and cross-cultural validation. Internal consistency of the HCCQ subscales was calculated using Cronbach's alpha, while intra-class correlation (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability. Additionally, socio-demographic and patient-reported data were collected to correlate with HCCQ scores.
Of those included at baseline, 436 (76%) completed the questionnaires after 2 months. CFA suggested that the fit of the HCCQ data to a 3-factor model was modest (RMSEA = 0.11, CFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.90). However, convergent validity was satisfactory, based on existing research. Internal consistency was good, as indicated by its Cronbach's alphas: total continuity of care (0.95); informational (0.93), relational (0.87), and management (0.89) continuity. The ICC for the total HCCQ score was 0.80 (95% CI [0.71, 0.87] p < 0.001). As indicated by negative care experiences (rated as 1 or 2 on the five-point scale), patients seemed to have limited knowledge about medical treatment, lifestyle modification and follow-up after PCI. Participation in cardiac rehabilitation and longer consultations with the general practitioner after hospital discharge were positively correlated with better continuity of care.
Implementation of the HCCQ will likely support healthcare providers and researchers in identifying problem areas of continuity of cardiac care and in evaluating interventions aimed at improving continuity of care.
心脏出院后的医疗连续性是一个优先事项,尤其是随着医疗保健系统变得越来越复杂和分散。很少有可用的工具来衡量心脏护理的连续性,尤其是从患者的角度来看。本研究的目的是:(1)将心脏护理连续性问卷(HCCQ)翻译成挪威语;(2)通过在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后接受自我报告的患者来确定其心理测量学特性。
HCCQ 首先从原始英文版本翻译成挪威语,遵循广泛使用的跨文化适应过程。数据在出院前和 2 个月的随访时收集。为了评估心理测量学特性,进行了验证性因素分析(CFA),并评估了三个构念效度方面:结构效度、假设检验和跨文化验证。使用 Cronbach 的 alpha 计算 HCCQ 子量表的内部一致性,使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估测试-重测信度。此外,还收集了社会人口统计学和患者报告的数据,以与 HCCQ 评分相关联。
在基线时纳入的患者中,有 436 名(76%)在 2 个月后完成了问卷。CFA 表明,HCCQ 数据拟合 3 因素模型的情况一般(RMSEA=0.11,CFI=0.90,TLI=0.90)。然而,基于现有研究,收敛效度令人满意。内部一致性良好,Cronbach 的 alpha 值如下:整体护理连续性(0.95);信息(0.93)、关系(0.87)和管理(0.89)连续性。HCCQ 总分的 ICC 为 0.80(95%CI[0.71,0.87],p<0.001)。根据负面护理体验(在五分制中评为 1 或 2),患者对 PCI 后的医疗、生活方式改变和随访似乎知之甚少。参与心脏康复和出院后与全科医生的咨询时间较长与更好的护理连续性呈正相关。
实施 HCCQ 可能会支持医疗保健提供者和研究人员确定心脏护理连续性的问题领域,并评估旨在改善护理连续性的干预措施。