Price K E
Am J Med. 1986 Jun 30;80(6B):182-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90499-7.
Following the development of amikacin, pharmaceutical companies made intensive efforts to find even more potent and broader-spectrum aminoglycosides. This effort was justifiable in view of the fact that over the preceding decade, these agents, because of their unique properties, had proven to be the primary weapons in the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of seriously ill patients. Since the toxicities associated with the aminoglycosides were beginning to limit their use in general medicine, researchers ultimately shifted their emphasis from probing for higher-potency, broader-spectrum agents to finding those with a reduced potential for toxicity. This article addresses the issue of whether superior aminoglycoside derivatives will reach the marketplace in the future. A comparison is made of several key properties of virtually all aminoglycosides that have reached an advanced preclinical development stage, gone into the clinic, or been registered for commercial use over the past 10 years. The following parameters are used for comparisons with already marketed aminoglycosides: antibacterial potency, as measured by relative minimum inhibitory concentrations for 50 percent of the strains tested, against wild-type Pseudomonas aeruginosa; degree of resistance to inactivation by microbial enzymes; and potential for toxicity utilizing comparative acute intravenous lethal doses for 50 percent of the population in mice, values that appear to predict the maximum recommended daily doses in man. An assessment of a number of compounds, including three structurally related to gentamicin, two to sisomicin, two to kanamycin A, three to kanamycin B, and two to fortimicin, revealed that none had overall properties superior to those already being utilized commercially. In no case did a compound prove to be less toxic, and in many instances, the antibacterial potency of the newer agents was lower than that exhibited by the older aminoglycosides. Some increase in resistance to inactivating enzymes was seen, but only BB-K 311 proved refractory to more enzymes than did amikacin. In view of this and the fact that no new agents of promise have moved into the development stage during the past five years, it seems safe to say that the current armamentarium of aminoglycosides is all that will be available for use in the foreseeable future.
在阿米卡星研发出来之后,制药公司投入大量精力去寻找更高效、抗菌谱更广的氨基糖苷类药物。鉴于在前十年中,这些药物因其独特的性质,已被证明是治疗重症患者的主要武器,所以这样的努力是合理的。由于与氨基糖苷类药物相关的毒性开始限制它们在普通医学中的使用,研究人员最终将重点从寻找更高效、抗菌谱更广的药物,转向寻找毒性潜力更低的药物。本文探讨了未来是否会有更优质的氨基糖苷类衍生物进入市场这一问题。对过去10年中几乎所有已进入临床前研发后期、进入临床试验或已注册用于商业用途的氨基糖苷类药物的几个关键特性进行了比较。以下参数用于与已上市的氨基糖苷类药物进行比较:抗菌效力,以对50%受试菌株的相对最低抑菌浓度来衡量,针对野生型铜绿假单胞菌;对微生物酶失活的抗性程度;以及利用小鼠群体中50%的半数致死急性静脉注射剂量来评估毒性潜力,这些数值似乎可以预测人体最大推荐日剂量。对多种化合物进行评估,包括三种与庆大霉素结构相关的、两种与西索米星结构相关的、两种与卡那霉素A结构相关的、三种与卡那霉素B结构相关的以及两种与福提米星结构相关的,结果显示没有一种化合物的总体特性优于目前已在商业上使用的药物。没有一种化合物的毒性更低,而且在许多情况下,新型药物的抗菌效力低于 older aminoglycosides 所表现出的效力。对失活酶的抗性有一定程度的提高,但只有BB-K 311对更多酶的抗性比阿米卡星更强。鉴于此,以及在过去五年中没有有前景的新药物进入研发阶段这一事实,可以有把握地说,在可预见的未来,现有的氨基糖苷类药物库将是可使用的全部药物。