• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于下颌骨骨折治疗的压缩螺钉的比较-实验研究。

Comparison of compression screws used for mandible head fracture treatment-experimental study.

机构信息

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Gen. J. Haller pl 1st, 90-647, Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):4059-4066. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02842-y. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-019-02842-y
PMID:30891645
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Compression screws that can fix a fracture of the condylar head of the mandible are available. Although typical titanium lag screws are generally used, a series of headless screws have been designed for this purpose. The "headless" advantage derived from the complete submergence of the screw in the bone after fixation is the lack of irritation of the lateral ligament of the temporo-mandibular joint by the screw head. The aim of this study is to compare the compression force of typically used lag screws with that of newly developed headless compression screws.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study tested five types of screws with a 14-mm length: 10 2.0-mm lag screws and 40 headless screws (four groups of equal size: 1.5-mm H screws, 1.8-mm H screws, 2.0-mm H screws, and 1.8-mm W screws). Two cuboid blocks of standardized polyurethane foam were fixed by one screw. The maximal compression force (F in N) and torque at maximal compression force (T in Ncm) were tested according to the guidelines of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM F1839-08).

RESULTS

The test results were as follows: 2.0-mm lag screw: F = 211.5 ± 20.7 and T = 21.1 ± 1.6; 1.5-mm H screw: F = 47.2 ± 5.6 and T = 18.2 ± 1.1; 1.8-mm H screw: F = 95.5 ± 9.8 and T = 18.2 ± 1.1; 2.0-mm H screw: F = 145.1 ± 18.4 and T = 25.5 ± 1.5; and 1.8-mm W screw: F = 180.5 ± 8.7 and T = 26.4 ± 2.8. Each type of screw significantly differed from one another as far as compression forces (F) were considered (p < 0.05): the best is the lag screw contrary to the thinnest H screw which is the worst one. For all tested screws, the compression force depended on the torque (S curve relationship was revealed, p < 0.05) and screw diameter (a larger diameter yielded greater compression, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 8-mm headless screws featured only a small loss of compression ability compared to the titanium lag screws.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Headless screws are mechanically attractive fixation materials for condylar head fracture treatment.

摘要

目的

有可用于固定下颌骨髁突头骨折的加压螺钉。尽管通常使用典型的钛制拉力螺钉,但为此目的已设计了一系列无头螺钉。“无头”的优势源自固定后螺钉完全淹没在骨中,螺钉头不会刺激颞下颌关节的外侧韧带。本研究的目的是比较常用的拉力螺钉与新开发的无头加压螺钉的压缩力。

材料与方法

本研究测试了五种长度为 14mm 的螺钉:10 个 2.0mm 的拉力螺钉和 40 个无头螺钉(四组大小相等:1.5mm H 螺钉、1.8mm H 螺钉、2.0mm H 螺钉和 1.8mm W 螺钉)。用一个螺钉固定两个标准化的聚氨脂泡沫立方块。根据美国材料试验协会(ASTM F1839-08)的指南,测试最大压缩力(F,单位为 N)和最大压缩力时的扭矩(T,单位为 Ncm)。

结果

测试结果如下:2.0mm 拉力螺钉:F=211.5±20.7,T=21.1±1.6;1.5mm H 螺钉:F=47.2±5.6,T=18.2±1.1;1.8mm H 螺钉:F=95.5±9.8,T=18.2±1.1;2.0mm H 螺钉:F=145.1±18.4,T=25.5±1.5;1.8mm W 螺钉:F=180.5±8.7,T=26.4±2.8。就压缩力(F)而言,每种类型的螺钉均明显不同(p<0.05):最好的是拉力螺钉,而最细的 H 螺钉最差。对于所有测试的螺钉,压缩力取决于扭矩(揭示了 S 曲线关系,p<0.05)和螺钉直径(较大的直径会产生更大的压缩力,p<0.05)。

结论

8mm 无头螺钉的压缩能力仅略有损失,与钛制拉力螺钉相比。

临床相关性

无头螺钉是治疗髁突头骨折的机械吸引力固定材料。

相似文献

1
Comparison of compression screws used for mandible head fracture treatment-experimental study.用于下颌骨骨折治疗的压缩螺钉的比较-实验研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):4059-4066. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02842-y. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
2
Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws.掌骨干固定:背侧钢板、拉力螺钉和无头加压螺钉的生物力学比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 7;22(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04200-0.
3
A biomechanical comparison of equine third metacarpal condylar bone fragment compression and screw pushout strength between headless tapered variable pitch and AO cortical bone screws.马第三掌骨髁状骨块无头锥形变螺距螺钉与AO皮质骨螺钉的生物力学比较:骨块压缩及螺钉推出强度对比
Vet Surg. 2002 May-Jun;31(3):201-10. doi: 10.1053/jvet.2002.32399.
4
A biomechanical comparison of headless tapered variable pitch and AO cortical bone screws for fixation of a simulated lateral condylar fracture in equine third metacarpal bones.无头锥形变螺距螺钉与AO皮质骨螺钉用于固定马第三掌骨模拟外侧髁骨折的生物力学比较
Vet Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;30(4):332-40. doi: 10.1053/jvet.2001.24386.
5
[A biomechanical comparison of Acutrak headless compression screw and AO cannulated lag screw for the fixation of Hoffa fracture].Acutrak无头加压螺钉与AO空心拉力螺钉固定Hoffa骨折的生物力学比较
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013 Mar;44(2):226-30.
6
Effect of oblique headless compression screw fixation for metacarpal shaft fracture: a biomechanical in vitro study.斜形无头加压螺钉固定治疗掌骨干骨折的效果:一项体外生物力学研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 5;22(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03939-2.
7
Partially threaded headless screw may benefit adequate interfragmentary compression and reduced driving torque for small bone fixation.部分螺纹无头螺钉可能有利于实现足够的骨折块间加压,并降低用于小骨固定时的打入扭矩。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499018760130. doi: 10.1177/2309499018760130.
8
Interfragmentary Compression Forces Vary Based on Scaphoid Bone Screw Type and Fracture Location.骨折块间压缩力因舟骨螺钉类型和骨折部位而异。
Hand (N Y). 2019 May;14(3):371-376. doi: 10.1177/1558944717745663. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
A Mechanical Comparison of the Compressive Force Generated by Various Headless Compression Screws and the Impact of Fracture Gap Size.各种无头加压螺钉产生的压缩力的机械比较及骨折间隙大小的影响。
Hand (N Y). 2021 Sep;16(5):604-611. doi: 10.1177/1558944719877890. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
10
Fully threaded headless compression screw versus partially threaded cancellous lag screw in medial malleolus fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes.全螺纹无头加压螺钉与部分螺纹松质骨拉力螺钉治疗内踝骨折:临床和影像学结果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01207-0. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of Permanent Dysfunction of Facial Nerves After Open Rigid Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Process Fracture.下颌髁突骨折切开坚固内固定术后面神经永久性功能障碍的风险
Med Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 9;13(3):121. doi: 10.3390/medsci13030121.
2
Headless Cannulated Screws for the Treatment of Intracapsular Condylar Fracture: A Prospective Study.无头空心螺钉治疗髁状突囊内骨折的前瞻性研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Jun;24(3):628-635. doi: 10.1007/s12663-025-02464-w. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
3
Biomechanical comparison of headless compression screws versus independent locking screw for intra-articular fractures.

本文引用的文献

1
Classification proposal for fractures of the processus condylaris mandibulae.下颌骨髁突骨折分类提案。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):485-491. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2459-1. Epub 2018 May 3.
2
Small-diameter compression screws completely embedded in bone for rigid internal fixation of the condylar head of the mandible.完全埋入骨内的小直径加压螺钉用于下颌骨髁突头部的坚固内固定。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;56(1):74-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
3
Biomechanical Comparison of Inter-fragmentary Compression Pressures: Lag Screw versus Herbert Screw for Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation.
无头加压螺丝钉与独立锁定螺丝钉治疗关节内骨折的生物力学比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Apr;34(3):1319-1325. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03792-8. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
4
Which of 51 Plate Designs Can Most Stably Fixate the Fragments in a Fracture of the Mandibular Condyle Base?51种接骨板设计中哪种能最稳定地固定下颌髁突基部骨折的骨折块?
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 5;12(13):4508. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134508.
5
Evaluation of the Relationship of Screw Pullout and Plate Fracutre in Fixation of Mandible Condyle Fractures: A Mechanistic Study.下颌髁突骨折内固定中螺钉拔出与钢板骨折关系的评估:一项机制研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 29;12(13):4380. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134380.
6
Current Frequency of Mandibular Condylar Process Fractures.下颌髁突骨折的当前发生率
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 9;12(4):1394. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041394.
7
The Osteosynthesis of the Mandibular Head, Does the Way the Screws Are Positioned Matter?下颌头的骨合成,螺钉的放置方式重要吗?
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):2031. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072031.
8
Bone Union Quality after Fracture Fixation of Mandibular Head with Compression Magnesium Screws.使用加压镁螺钉固定下颌头骨折后的骨愈合质量
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 17;15(6):2230. doi: 10.3390/ma15062230.
9
Clinical Evaluation of Magnesium Alloy Osteosynthesis in the Mandibular Head.镁合金在下颌骨髁突骨合成中的临床评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 18;15(3):711. doi: 10.3390/ma15030711.
10
The Use of Titanium 3D Mini-Plates in the Surgical Treatment of Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.钛3D微型接骨板在下颌骨髁突骨折手术治疗中的应用:一项临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 16;10(16):3604. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163604.
骨折块间压缩压力的生物力学比较:用于前路齿突螺钉固定的拉力螺钉与Herbert螺钉对比
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017 Sep;60(5):498-503. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0202.011. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
4
Long-term results of ORIF of condylar head fractures of the mandible: A prospective 5-year follow-up study of small-fragment positional-screw osteosynthesis (SFPSO).下颌骨髁突头部骨折切开复位内固定术的长期结果:小碎片定位螺钉骨合成术(SFPSO)的前瞻性5年随访研究
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 May;43(4):452-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
5
A central threadless shaft screw is better than a fully threaded variable pitch screw for unstable scaphoid nonunion: a biomechanical study.对于不稳定舟骨骨不连,中心无螺纹轴螺钉优于全螺纹变螺距螺钉:一项生物力学研究。
Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):638-42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
6
Should we use cortical bone screws for cortical bone trajectory?我们应该使用皮质骨螺钉来进行皮质骨通道固定吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):416-21. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE1484. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
7
Interfragmentary compression profile of 4 headless bone screws: an analysis of the compression lost on reinsertion.4枚无头接骨螺钉的骨折块间加压情况:重新置入时加压损失的分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1845-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
8
The durability of the intrascaphoid compression of headless compression screws: in vitro study.无头加压螺钉舟状骨内加压的耐久性:体外研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jun;37(6):1142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.018.
9
Biomechanical analysis of second-generation headless compression screws.第二代无头加压螺钉的生物力学分析。
Injury. 2012 Jul;43(7):1159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.03.015. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
10
A biomechanical study on preloaded compression eVect on headless screws.预加载压缩对无头螺钉的生物力学影响的一项研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Dec;129(12):1601-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0971-0.