Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Division of Emerging Media Studies, Boston University, 704 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 20;13(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0723-z.
Poor dissemination of research findings may hamper the reach and impact of scientific discoveries. One key emerging platform for research dissemination is social media, including Twitter. While Twitter and other social media are increasingly being used to disseminate research content presented during scientific conferences, few studies have investigated the extent to which these tools are used throughout conferences and how they are being used. The aim for this study was to better understand the use of Twitter during the 2016 Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health (D&I conference).
We performed an analysis of Twitter use before, during, and after the 2016 D&I conference, which took place from December 14 to 15. All tweets (posted between December 1 and 31) that included the conference-specific hashtag (#DIScience16) were assessed. We identified 2639 tweets using the data analytics platform NUVI. We used NUVI software to generate statistics about reach, influence, mentions, and origin of the tweets. Individual tweet content was also assessed using DiscoverText and coded for disease category, implementation outcomes discussed, category of tweet, and conference track.
A total of 2639 tweets were analyzed; 89.1% of the tweets were posted during the conference. A total of 389 unique users participated on Twitter, representing 31 states and 22 locations outside of the USA. Most (56.8%) tweets were re-tweets and were used for scientific promotion (50.6%). Key conference speakers and implementation outcomes (de-implementation, adaptation, and fidelity) were commonly discussed.
Our findings reveal that Twitter was used as a platform during the D&I conference, both to facilitate conference discussion and to promote scientific ideas. This work contributes to the existing data analytics and implementation science literature in two major ways: (1) by advancing knowledge of how social media is used during annual academic conferences and (2) by providing a deeper understanding of themes and emerging areas of interest in the dissemination and implementation sciences. Knowing specific topics of interest can help planners and scientists better understand the landscape of current and future implementation research and encourage new research dissemination strategies.
研究结果传播不畅可能会阻碍科学发现的应用和影响。社交媒体是新兴的研究传播平台之一,其中包括 Twitter。虽然 Twitter 和其他社交媒体越来越多地被用于传播科学会议上展示的研究内容,但很少有研究调查这些工具在会议期间的使用程度以及使用方式。本研究旨在更好地了解 2016 年传播与实施科学年度会议(D&I 会议)期间 Twitter 的使用情况。
我们分析了 2016 年 12 月 14 日至 15 日举行的 D&I 会议前后的 Twitter 使用情况。评估了包含会议特定标签(#DIScience16)的所有推文(12 月 1 日至 31 日发布的推文)。我们使用数据分析平台 NUVI 识别了 2639 条推文。我们使用 NUVI 软件生成了有关推文的覆盖范围、影响力、提及率和来源的统计信息。还使用 DiscoverText 评估了单个推文的内容,并根据疾病类别、讨论的实施结果、推文类别和会议轨道对其进行了编码。
共分析了 2639 条推文,其中 89.1%的推文是在会议期间发布的。共有 389 位独特用户在 Twitter 上参与,代表了 31 个州和美国以外的 22 个地点。大多数(56.8%)推文是转发,用于科学推广(50.6%)。主要会议演讲者和实施结果(取消实施、调整和保真度)经常被讨论。
我们的研究结果表明,Twitter 在 D&I 会议期间被用作一个平台,既促进了会议讨论,又促进了科学思想的传播。这项工作以两种主要方式为现有的数据分析和实施科学文献做出了贡献:(1)通过了解社交媒体在年度学术会议期间的使用方式,(2)通过更深入地了解传播和实施科学领域的当前和新兴关注主题。了解特定的兴趣主题可以帮助规划者和科学家更好地了解当前和未来实施研究的现状,并鼓励新的研究传播策略。