Somensi Danusa Neves, Teixeira Renan Kleber Costa, Feijó Daniel Haber, Loureiro Karine Drumond, Valente André Lopes, Carvalho Luan Teles Ferreira de, Calvo Faustino Chaves, Santos Deivid Ramos Dos, Barros Rui Sergio Monteiro de
MD, MS, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA), Belem-PA, Brazil. Conception, design, intellectual and scientific content of the study; interpretation of data; manuscript writing; critical revision.
MD, MS, Department of Experimental Surgery, School of Medicine, UEPA, Belem-PA, Brazil. Interpretation of data, manuscript writing, critical revision.
Acta Cir Bras. 2019 Mar 18;34(3):e201900304. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020190030000004.
To evaluate if the type of electrode (needle vs. surface) affects the electromyoneurography parameters in rats.
Twenty male rats were anesthetized, then compound muscle action potential were recorded using a Neuropack S1 MEB- 9400©. All animals were submitted to two electroneuromyography analysis: first with surface electrode and then by needle electrode. We evaluated the latency, amplitude, duration and area of the negative peak of the gastrocnemius and cranial tibial muscles.
There were no significant differences between the groups in the mean of duration, latency, amplitude or area of the negative peak in gastrocnemius and cranial tibial muscles.
The type of electrode does not affect the electroneuromyography parameters.
评估电极类型(针电极与表面电极)是否会影响大鼠的肌电图参数。
将20只雄性大鼠麻醉,然后使用Neuropack S1 MEB - 9400©记录复合肌肉动作电位。所有动物均接受两次肌电图分析:首先使用表面电极,然后使用针电极。我们评估了腓肠肌和胫前肌负峰的潜伏期、波幅、持续时间和面积。
两组在腓肠肌和胫前肌负峰的平均持续时间、潜伏期、波幅或面积方面无显著差异。
电极类型不影响肌电图参数。