• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基层医疗中实施重症护理计划。

Implementing the Serious Illness Care Program in Primary Care.

作者信息

Massmann Jill A, Revier Sara S, Ponto Julie

机构信息

Jill A. Massmann DNP, APRN, CNS, AGCNS-BC, OCN, ACHPN, is a palliative care clinical nurse specialist, St. Cloud Hospital; and was DNP student (during project implementation), Department of Nursing, Winona State University, Rochester. Minnesota. Sara S. Revier MSN, APRN, CNS, ACNS-BC, ACHPN, is a palliative care clinical nurse specialist, St. Cloud Hospital, Minnesota. Julie Ponto PhD, APRN, CNS, AGCNS-BC, AOCNS, is professor and AGCNS program coordinator, Department of Nursing, Winona State University, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2019 Aug;21(4):291-299. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000531.

DOI:10.1097/NJH.0000000000000531
PMID:30893288
Abstract

Inadequate communication about serious illness care preferences affects patients, families, health care providers, and health care systems. Many patient and system barriers prevent comprehensive serious illness communication. The purpose of this evidence-based practice project was to provide a structure within a primary care clinic to facilitate conversations with seriously ill individuals about their care preferences that (a) was adaptable to clinic workflow, (b) improved providers' perception of the care conversation experience, (c) improved documentation of care preferences, and (d) provided a comfortable and helpful experience. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model and Serious Illness Care Program were used to address provider and system barriers to conversations about care preferences. Program interventions included training providers and staff; identifying patients at risk for high symptom burden and mortality; integrating system interventions; and evaluating outcomes. Providers completed training, after which a 5-week pilot practice change was conducted. Provider perceptions of conversations after implementation were positive. During the pilot, 3 serious illness care conversations were initiated with additional patients prepared for future conversations using an information sheet and introduction to the conversation.

摘要

关于重症护理偏好的沟通不足会影响患者、家属、医疗服务提供者和医疗系统。许多患者和系统障碍阻碍了全面的重症沟通。这个基于证据的实践项目的目的是在初级保健诊所内提供一个框架,以促进与重症患者就其护理偏好进行对话,该框架要(a)能适应诊所工作流程,(b)改善医疗服务提供者对护理对话体验的认知,(c)完善护理偏好的记录,以及(d)提供舒适且有益的体验。约翰霍普金斯护理循证实践模型和重症护理项目被用于解决医疗服务提供者和系统在护理偏好对话方面的障碍。项目干预措施包括培训医疗服务提供者和工作人员;识别有高症状负担和高死亡率风险的患者;整合系统干预措施;以及评估结果。医疗服务提供者完成了培训,之后进行了为期5周的试点实践变革。实施后,医疗服务提供者对对话的看法是积极的。在试点期间,启动了3次重症护理对话,并为更多患者准备了信息表和对话介绍,以便未来进行对话。

相似文献

1
Implementing the Serious Illness Care Program in Primary Care.在基层医疗中实施重症护理计划。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2019 Aug;21(4):291-299. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000531.
2
A systematic intervention to improve serious illness communication in primary care: Effect on expenses at the end of life.一项旨在改善初级保健中重病沟通的系统干预措施:对生命终末期费用的影响。
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Jun;8(2):100431. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100431. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Improving Communication About Serious Illness in Primary Care: A Review.改善初级保健中严重疾病的沟通:综述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1380-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3212.
4
Clinicians' Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program: A Qualitative Study.实施重症护理计划后临床医生的观点:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21517.
5
Implementing Serious Illness Communication Processes in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.在初级保健中实施严重疾病沟通流程:一项定性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 May;38(5):459-466. doi: 10.1177/1049909120951095. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
6
Interprofessional Work in Serious Illness Communication in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.初级保健中严重疾病沟通的跨专业工作:一项定性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Jul;22(7):751-763. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0471. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Using Nurse Care Managers Trained in the Serious Illness Conversation Guide to Increase Goals-of-Care Conversations in an Accountable Care Organization.使用接受过严重疾病对话指南培训的护士护理经理,在责任制医疗组织中增加目标关怀对话。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jan;23(1):112-115. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0110. Epub 2019 May 13.
8
Physicians' perceptions of the implementation of the serious illness care program: a qualitative study.医生对重病护理计划实施的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):1401. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10419-5.
9
Serious illness care Programme UK: assessing the 'face validity', applicability and relevance of the serious illness conversation guide for use within the UK health care setting.英国重症护理计划:评估重症谈话指南在英国医疗环境中使用的“表面效度”、适用性和相关性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4209-8.
10
The Surprise Question and Serious Illness Conversations: A pilot study.惊喜问题和严重疾病对话:一项试点研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Sep;28(6):1010-1025. doi: 10.1177/0969733020983392. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Core Competencies for Serious Illness Conversations: An Integrative Systematic Review.严重疾病对话的核心能力:综合系统评价。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Oct;39(4):340-351. doi: 10.1177/08258597241245022. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Swedish Serious Illness Conversation Guide.瑞典重症疾病沟通指南的翻译、改编和验证。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Jan;39(1):21-28. doi: 10.1177/08258597231210136. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
3
Education modalities for serious illness communication training: A scoping review on the impact on clinician behavior and patient outcomes.
重病沟通培训的教育模式:对临床医生行为和患者结果影响的范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2024 Feb;38(2):170-183. doi: 10.1177/02692163231186180. Epub 2023 Jul 9.
4
Core elements of serious illness conversations: an integrative systematic review.重病谈话的核心要素:一项综合性系统评价
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2268-e2279. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004163.
5
A prospective cross-sectional survey comparing patient and provider expectations regarding ovarian cancer prognosis.一项前瞻性横断面调查,比较患者和医疗服务提供者对卵巢癌预后的期望。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jul 8;42:101042. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101042. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Patient Identification for Serious Illness Conversations: A Scoping Review.严重疾病谈话中的患者识别:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;19(7):4162. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074162.