Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China.
Qingdao Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Qingdao 266003, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Aug 10;937:173182. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173182. Epub 2024 May 11.
Organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) are widely used as alternatives to brominated flame retardants in a variety of consumer products and their consumption has continuously increased in recent years. However, their concentrations and human exposures in indoor microenvironments, particularly in a university environment, have received limited attention. In this study, the concentrations and seasonal variations of 15 OPFRs were assessed in typical microenvironments of two universities, including dormitories, offices, public microenvironments (PMEs: classroom, dining hall, gymnasium and library), and laboratories on the northern coast of China. Analysis of the OPFRs in both air and dust samples indicated widespread distribution in college campuses. The average concentration of ∑OPFRs in the winter (12,774.4 ng/g and 5.3 ng/m for dust and air, respectively) was higher than in the summer (2460.4 ng/g and 4.6 ng/m for dust and air, respectively). The dust and air samples collected from PMEs and laboratories exhibited higher concentrations of OPFRs, followed by offices and dormitories. An equilibrium was reached between dust and air in all collected microenvironments. The daily intakes of OPFRs were significantly lower than the reference dose. Dust ingestion was the primary intake pathway in the winter, while inhalation and dust ingestion were the main intake pathways in the summer. The non-carcinogenic hazard quotients fell within the range of 10-10 in both the summer and winter, which are below the theoretical risk threshold. For the carcinogenic risk, the LCR values ranged from 10 to 10, indicating no elevated carcinogenic risk due to TnBP, TCEP, and TDCP in indoor dust and air.
有机磷阻燃剂 (OPFRs) 作为溴系阻燃剂的替代品在各种消费品中被广泛使用,近年来其消耗量不断增加。然而,它们在室内微环境中的浓度和人体暴露水平,尤其是在大学校园环境中,受到的关注有限。在这项研究中,评估了中国北方两个大学校园内典型微环境(包括宿舍、办公室、公共微环境(教室、餐厅、体育馆和图书馆)和实验室)中 15 种 OPFRs 的浓度和季节性变化。空气中和灰尘样本中 OPFRs 的分析表明,它们在大学校园中有广泛的分布。冬季(灰尘和空气中的∑OPFRs 浓度分别为 12774.4ng/g 和 5.3ng/m)的平均浓度高于夏季(灰尘和空气中的∑OPFRs 浓度分别为 2460.4ng/g 和 4.6ng/m)。从 PME 和实验室收集的灰尘和空气样本显示出更高浓度的 OPFRs,其次是办公室和宿舍。在所有收集的微环境中,灰尘和空气之间达到了平衡。OPFRs 的日摄入量明显低于参考剂量。冬季,灰尘摄入是主要的摄入途径,而夏季则以吸入和灰尘摄入为主。在夏季和冬季,非致癌危害指数均在 10-10 范围内,低于理论风险阈值。对于致癌风险,LCR 值范围从 10 到 10,这表明室内灰尘和空气中的 TnBP、TCEP 和 TDCP 没有增加致癌风险。