• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病学中心患者对参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度。

The Attitude of Patients from a Romanian Tertiary Cardiology Center Regarding Participation in Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Rusu Iulia, Popa-Fotea Nicoleta-Monica, Stanculescu Mihaela Octavia, Rusu Diana, Dumitru Alexandra, Scafa-Udriste Alexandru, Udrea Oana-Maria, Micheu Miruna Mihaela

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania.

Department of Cardiology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Oct 31;57(11):1180. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111180.

DOI:10.3390/medicina57111180
PMID:34833398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8625162/
Abstract

: biomarker-based studies are the cornerstone of precision medicine, providing key data for tailored medical care. Enrollment of the planned number of patients is a critical determinant of a successful clinical trial. Moreover, for inclusive medical care, patients from different socio-demographic backgrounds must be recruited. Still, a significant number of trials fail to reach these prerequisites. Designing the informed consent forms based on the patients' feedback could optimize accrual. We aimed to explore the attitudes of patients from a Romanian tertiary cardiology center towards participation in biomarker-based clinical trials. : three hundred forty inpatients were interviewed based on a semi-structured questionnaire which included four sections: demographics, personal medical history, attitudes and trust. : Roughly, 62.5% of the respondents were interested in enrolling, while altruistic reasons were the most frequently expressed. Clear exposure of the possible risks was most valued (37.78%), followed by the possibility of directly communicating with the research team (23.78%). The most frequently chosen answer by acutely ill patients was improvement of their health, whereas chronically ill individuals indicated the possibility of withdrawal without affecting the quality of medical care. Importantly, the participation rate could be improved if the invitation to enrollment were made by both the current physician and the study coordinator ( = 0.0001). The level of trust in researchers was high in more than 50% of the respondents, and was correlated with therapeutic compliance and with the desire to join a biomarker study. the information gained will facilitate a tailored approach to patient enrollment in future biomarker-based studies in our clinic.

摘要

基于生物标志物的研究是精准医学的基石,为个性化医疗提供关键数据。招募计划数量的患者是临床试验成功的关键决定因素。此外,为了提供全面的医疗服务,必须招募来自不同社会人口背景的患者。然而,仍有大量试验未能达到这些先决条件。根据患者反馈设计知情同意书可以优化入组情况。我们旨在探讨罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病中心的患者对参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度。对340名住院患者进行了基于半结构化问卷的访谈,问卷包括四个部分:人口统计学、个人病史、态度和信任。大致而言,62.5%的受访者有兴趣入组,其中利他主义原因是最常提及的。明确告知可能的风险最受重视(37.78%),其次是与研究团队直接沟通的可能性(23.78%)。急性病患者最常选择的答案是改善健康状况,而慢性病患者则表示有可能退出而不影响医疗质量。重要的是,如果由现任医生和研究协调员共同发出入组邀请,参与率可能会提高(P = 0.0001)。超过50%的受访者对研究人员的信任度较高,且信任度与治疗依从性以及参与生物标志物研究的意愿相关。所获得的信息将有助于在我们诊所未来基于生物标志物的研究中采用个性化的患者招募方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bd4/8625162/c6409c964368/medicina-57-01180-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bd4/8625162/c6409c964368/medicina-57-01180-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bd4/8625162/c6409c964368/medicina-57-01180-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Attitude of Patients from a Romanian Tertiary Cardiology Center Regarding Participation in Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials.罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病学中心患者对参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Oct 31;57(11):1180. doi: 10.3390/medicina57111180.
2
The Attitude of Patients from a Romanian Tertiary Cardiology Center as Regards Participation in Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials - Survey Methodology.罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病学中心患者对参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度——调查方法
J Med Life. 2018 Oct-Dec;11(4):320-327. doi: 10.25122/jml-2018-0072.
3
Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients.医生、研究人员和癌症患者对癌症临床试验参与的态度和信念存在差异。
Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;17(2):184-194. doi: 10.1177/1740774520901514. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent.个体临床结果对试验参与者在未经同意情况下参与紧急研究的招募观点的影响。
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):180-186. doi: 10.1177/1740774516677276. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
5
Oncologic patients' misconceptions may impede enrollment into clinical trials: a cross-sectional study.肿瘤患者的误解可能会阻碍其入组临床试验:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01478-5.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Demographic and Health Behavior Factors Associated With Clinical Trial Invitation and Participation in the United States.与临床试验邀请和参与相关的人口统计学和健康行为因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27792.
8
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
9
Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of the public and out-patients.临床试验的伦理问题:公众和门诊患者的态度
J Intern Med. 1999 Jun;245(6):571-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00502.x.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Willingness to Share yet Maintain Influence: A Cross-Sectional Study on Attitudes in Sweden to the Use of Electronic Health Data.分享意愿与保持影响力:瑞典对电子健康数据使用态度的横断面研究
Public Health Ethics. 2020 Nov 27;14(1):23-34. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa035. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
A systematic literature review of attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on consent.关于对卫生行政和临床试验数据二次使用与共享态度的系统文献综述:以同意为重点。
Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;10(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01663-z.
3
Public awareness of and attitudes towards research biobanks in Latvia.
拉脱维亚公众对研究生物样本库的认知与态度。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 31;21(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00506-1.
4
Patients' Knowledge and Attitude Toward Biobanks in Eastern Morocco.摩洛哥东部的患者对生物库的认知和态度。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Jun;18(3):189-195. doi: 10.1089/bio.2019.0047. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
5
The Attitude of Patients from a Romanian Tertiary Cardiology Center as Regards Participation in Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials - Survey Methodology.罗马尼亚一家三级心脏病学中心患者对参与基于生物标志物的临床试验的态度——调查方法
J Med Life. 2018 Oct-Dec;11(4):320-327. doi: 10.25122/jml-2018-0072.
6
The Public's Awareness of and Attitude Toward Research Biobanks - A Regional German Survey.公众对研究生物样本库的认知与态度——一项德国地区性调查
Front Genet. 2018 May 24;9:190. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00190. eCollection 2018.
7
Public Trust in Physicians-Health Care Commodification as a Possible Deteriorating Factor: Cross-sectional Analysis of 23 Countries.公众对医生的信任——医疗商品化作为一个可能的恶化因素:对23个国家的横断面分析
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018759174. doi: 10.1177/0046958018759174.
8
Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.生物样本研究的广泛同意:美国四个医疗中心实际捐赠者的观点。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Apr;13(2):115-124. doi: 10.1177/1556264617751204. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections.生物样本库研究中知情同意书模板的参与式改进——研究结果与方法学思考
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 20;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0232-7.
10
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.