Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, India.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Aug;139(8):1057-1068. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03172-0. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
Recalcitrant distal femur nonunions (RDFN) are a challenge in management due to factors including poor bone stock, multiple surgeries, metaphyseal bone loss, and joint contractures. There are no specific guidelines in the management of cases of RDFN. Based on our experience, we devised an algorithm and we present the results of 62 cases of RDFN managed following it.
Our algorithm was formulated after analyzing 34 cases of RDFN and it involved four factors which were hypothesized to influence outcomes namely: distal femoral bone stock, extent of medial void, alignment of the fracture, and stability of fixation. Each factor was addressed specifically to achieve a good outcome. Between 2012 and 2015, 62 patients with RDFN at a mean age of 47.4 years (26-73) and 2.3 prior surgeries (2-6) were managed following the algorithm.
58 patients required revision osteosynthesis to improve alignment and achieve a stable fixation. 4 elderly patients with poor bone stock were managed with arthroplasty. Extent of medial void was found to significantly influence surgical decision making. Five patients without medial void required only cancellous autograft bone grafting, 47 patients with < 2 cm void were treated with an allograft fibular strut inserted in the metaphysis and 6 patients with a void > 2 cm were managed with medial plating.
57 patients treated with osteosynthesis achieved union at an average of 7.4 months (6-11) and the 4 patients managed with arthroplasty also had a favourable outcome. One patient who was managed with revision osteosynthesis had a nonunion with an implant failure and needed an arthroplasty procedure. The average LEFS (lower extremity functional score) of all our patients was 67 (51-76) at an average follow-up of 18.2 months (12-33).
Our stepwise surgical algorithm would help surgeons to identify the factors that need to be addressed and guide them towards the interventions that are necessary to achieve a successful outcome while managing cases of RDFN.
III.
Level I Tertiary trauma centre.
难治性股骨远端骨不连(RDFN)是一种治疗挑战,其原因包括骨量差、多次手术、干骺端骨丢失和关节挛缩。对于 RDFN 的治疗,目前没有具体的指南。基于我们的经验,我们制定了一个算法,并介绍了该算法治疗 62 例 RDFN 的结果。
我们的算法是在分析 34 例 RDFN 后制定的,其中涉及到四个被认为会影响结果的因素:股骨远端骨量、内侧缺损程度、骨折对线和固定稳定性。每个因素都得到了具体的处理,以达到良好的结果。2012 年至 2015 年,我们按照该算法治疗了 62 例 RDFN 患者,平均年龄 47.4 岁(26-73 岁),平均有 2.3 次手术(2-6 次)。
58 例患者需要进行翻修以改善对线并获得稳定的固定。4 例高龄、骨量差的患者采用关节置换治疗。内侧缺损程度对手术决策有显著影响。5 例无内侧缺损的患者仅需要松质骨自体植骨,47 例缺损<2cm 的患者采用异体腓骨支撑条插入干骺端,6 例缺损>2cm 的患者采用内侧钢板固定。
57 例接受内固定治疗的患者平均在 7.4 个月(6-11 个月)时获得愈合,4 例接受关节置换治疗的患者也获得了良好的结果。1 例接受翻修内固定的患者发生骨不连和内固定失败,需要进行关节置换手术。所有患者的平均 LEFS(下肢功能评分)为 67 分(51-76 分),平均随访 18.2 个月(12-33 个月)。
我们的分步手术算法可以帮助外科医生确定需要处理的因素,并指导他们进行必要的干预,以成功治疗 RDFN。
III 级。
三级创伤中心。