Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, VIC, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
University of Washington Clinical Trial Center, Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Resuscitation. 2019 May;138:168-181. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival varies greatly between communities. The Utstein template was developed and promulgated to improve the comparability of OHCA outcome reports, but it has undergone limited empiric validation. We sought to assess how much of the variation in OHCA survival between emergency medical services (EMS) across the globe is explained by differences in the Utstein factors. We also assessed how accurately the Utstein factors predict OHCA survival.
We performed a retrospective analysis of patient-level prospectively collected data from 12 OHCA registries from 12 countries for the period 1 Jan 2006 through 31 Dec 2011. We used generalized linear mixed models to examine the variation in survival between EMS agencies (n=232).
Twelve registries contributed 86,759 cases. Patient arrest characteristics, EMS treatment and patient outcomes varied across registries. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 10% (range, 6% to 22%). Overall survival with Cerebral Performance Category of 1 or 2 (available for 8/12 registries) was 8% (range, 2% to 20%). The area-under-the-curve for the Utstein model was 0.85 (Wald CI: 0.85-0.85). The Utstein factors explained 51% of the EMS agency variation in OHCA survival.
The Utstein factors explained 51% of the variation in survival to hospital discharge among multiple large geographically separate EMS agencies. This suggests that quality improvement and public health efforts should continue to target modifiable Utstein factors to improve OHCA survival. Further study is required to identify the reasons for the variation that is incompletely understood.
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的存活率在不同社区之间差异很大。Utstein 模板的制定和推广旨在提高 OHCA 结果报告的可比性,但它只经过了有限的经验验证。我们试图评估全球范围内不同的紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构之间 OHCA 存活率的差异有多少可以用 Utstein 因素来解释。我们还评估了 Utstein 因素对 OHCA 存活率的预测能力。
我们对 12 个国家的 12 个 OHCA 注册中心在 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日期间收集的前瞻性患者水平数据进行了回顾性分析。我们使用广义线性混合模型来研究 EMS 机构之间(n=232)生存率的变化。
12 个注册中心共提供了 86759 例病例。患者的停搏特征、EMS 治疗和患者结局在各注册中心之间存在差异。总的出院生存率为 10%(范围为 6%至 22%)。具有 Cerebral Performance Category 1 或 2 的生存率(12 个注册中心中有 8 个可用)为 8%(范围为 2%至 20%)。Utstein 模型的曲线下面积为 0.85(Wald CI:0.85-0.85)。Utstein 因素解释了 OHCA 生存率中 51%的 EMS 机构间差异。
Utstein 因素解释了多个地理位置不同的大型 EMS 机构之间出院生存率差异的 51%。这表明,质量改进和公共卫生工作应继续针对可改变的 Utstein 因素,以提高 OHCA 生存率。需要进一步研究以确定无法完全理解的差异的原因。