Bommer Christian, Vollmer Sebastian, Subramanian S V
Department of Economics & Centre for Modern Indian Studies, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Feb 8;4(1):e001175. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001175. eCollection 2019.
Reducing stunting is an important part of the global health agenda. Despite likely changes in risk factors as children age, determinants of stunting are typically analysed without taking into account age-related heterogeneity. We aim to fill this gap by providing an in-depth analysis of the role of socioeconomic status (SES) as a moderator for the stunting-age pattern.
Epidemiological and socioeconomic data from 72 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) were used to calculate stunting-age patterns by SES quartiles, derived from an index of household assets. We further investigated how differences in age-specific stunting rates between children from rich and poor households are explained by determinants that could be modified by nutrition-specific versus nutrition-sensitive interventions.
While stunting prevalence in the pooled sample of 72 DHS is low in children up to the age of 5 months (maximum prevalence of 17.8% (95% CI 16.4;19.3)), stunting rates in older children tend to exceed those of younger ones in the age bracket of 6-20 months. This pattern is more pronounced in the poorest than in the richest quartile, with large differences in stunting prevalence at 20 months (stunting rates: 40.7% (95% CI 39.5 to 41.8) in the full sample, 50.3% (95% CI 48.2 to 52.4) in the poorest quartile and 29.2% (95% CI 26.8 to 31.5) in the richest quartile). When adjusting for determinants related to nutrition-specific interventions only, SES-related differences decrease by up to 30.1%. Much stronger effects (up to 59.2%) occur when determinants related to nutrition-sensitive interventions are additionally included.
While differences between children from rich and poor households are small during the first 5 months of life, SES is an important moderator for age-specific stunting rates in older children. Determinants related to nutrition-specific interventions are not sufficient to explain these SES-related differences, which could imply that a multifactorial approach is needed to reduce age-specific stunting rates in the poorest children.
减少发育迟缓是全球健康议程的重要组成部分。尽管随着儿童年龄增长,风险因素可能会发生变化,但发育迟缓的决定因素通常在不考虑年龄相关异质性的情况下进行分析。我们旨在通过深入分析社会经济地位(SES)作为发育迟缓年龄模式调节因素的作用来填补这一空白。
利用来自72项人口与健康调查(DHS)的流行病学和社会经济数据,根据家庭资产指数计算按SES四分位数划分的发育迟缓年龄模式。我们进一步研究了贫富家庭儿童在特定年龄发育迟缓率上的差异是如何由可通过营养特定干预与营养敏感干预加以改变的决定因素来解释的。
在72项DHS的汇总样本中,5个月及以下儿童的发育迟缓患病率较低(最高患病率为17.8%(95%置信区间16.4;19.3)),而在6 - 20个月年龄组中,年龄较大儿童的发育迟缓率往往超过年龄较小儿童。这种模式在最贫困四分位数组中比在最富裕四分位数组中更为明显,在20个月时发育迟缓患病率存在较大差异(全样本发育迟缓率:40.7%(95%置信区间39.5至41.8),最贫困四分位数组为50.3%(95%置信区间48.2至52.4),最富裕四分位数组为29.2%(95%置信区间26.8至31.5))。仅对与营养特定干预相关的决定因素进行调整时,与SES相关的差异最多减少30.1%。当额外纳入与营养敏感干预相关的决定因素时,效果更为显著(高达59.2%)。
虽然在生命的前5个月里,贫富家庭儿童之间的差异较小,但SES是年龄较大儿童特定年龄发育迟缓率的重要调节因素。与营养特定干预相关的决定因素不足以解释这些与SES相关的差异,这可能意味着需要采取多因素方法来降低最贫困儿童的特定年龄发育迟缓率。