• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用丹麦老年丧偶配偶样本比较病理性悲伤的拟议诊断标准:对未来丧亲研究的看法。

Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria for pathological grief using a sample of elderly bereaved spouses in Denmark: Perspectives on future bereavement research.

机构信息

Unit for Bereavement Research, Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; The Danish National Center for Grief, Copenhagen, Denmark.

DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2019 May 15;251:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.056. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.056
PMID:30903989
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A distinct grief-specific disorder is included in the ICD-11. Lack of clarity remains regarding whether different proposed diagnostic criteria capture similar or different diagnostic entities. Our aim was to examine the specificity of four proposed diagnostic criteria-sets for pathological grief in a population-based sample.

METHODS

Participants were 206 conjugally bereaved elderly Danes (59% female; mean age = 72.5 years, SD = 4.2; range 65-81) who completed self-report questionnaires six months post-loss. The main measure was the Danish version of Inventory of Complicated Grief-Revised.

RESULTS

Results indicate substantial agreement between Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD), Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder (PCBD) and ICD-11-PGD (kappa's = 0.69-0.84), which found 6-9% of cases tested positive for pathological grief. Complicated Grief (CG) was partly in agreement with the three other symptom-diagnostic tests (kappa's = 0.13-0.20), and the prevalence-rate of pathological grief was 48%.

LIMITATIONS

The low response-rate of 39%. The selective inclusion of data ≥6 months post-loss prevents a comparison of acute and prolonged grief reactions. Using self-reported data, not diagnostic interviews, challenges the validity of our findings. Using a sample of elderly people may limit the generalizability of our results to other age groups.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that PGD, PCBD and ICD-11-PGD may be more discriminative in identifying a specific grief-related psychopathology, while CG may identify a broader set of grief reactions.

摘要

背景

ICD-11 中包含一种独特的 grief-specific 障碍。目前仍不清楚不同的提议诊断标准是否捕捉到相似或不同的诊断实体。我们的目的是在基于人群的样本中检查四种病理性悲伤的提议诊断标准集的特异性。

方法

参与者是 206 名配偶丧亲的丹麦老年人(59%为女性;平均年龄为 72.5 岁,标准差为 4.2;范围为 65-81),他们在丧失后六个月完成了自我报告问卷。主要测量工具是丹麦版的修订后的复杂悲伤清单。

结果

结果表明,延长性悲伤障碍(PGD)、持续性复杂丧亲障碍(PCBD)和 ICD-11-PGD 之间存在实质性的一致性(kappa's=0.69-0.84),这三种诊断标准发现有 6-9%的病例被检测为病理性悲伤。复杂悲伤(CG)与其他三种症状诊断测试部分一致(kappa's=0.13-0.20),病理性悲伤的患病率为 48%。

局限性

39%的低回应率。选择性纳入数据≥6 个月后丧失,阻止了对急性和延长性悲伤反应的比较。使用自我报告的数据,而不是诊断访谈,对我们研究结果的有效性提出了挑战。使用老年人样本可能会限制我们的研究结果在其他年龄组中的普遍性。

结论

我们建议,PGD、PCBD 和 ICD-11-PGD 可能更具鉴别力,可用于识别特定的与悲伤相关的精神病理学,而 CG 可能识别更广泛的悲伤反应。

相似文献

1
Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria for pathological grief using a sample of elderly bereaved spouses in Denmark: Perspectives on future bereavement research.使用丹麦老年丧偶配偶样本比较病理性悲伤的拟议诊断标准:对未来丧亲研究的看法。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 15;251:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.056. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
2
Further evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder and ICD-11 criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder.进一步评估 DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准和 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的因子结构、患病率和同时效度。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
3
Comparison of DSM-5 criteria for persistent complex bereavement disorder and ICD-11 criteria for prolonged grief disorder in help-seeking bereaved children.寻求帮助的丧亲儿童中 DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准与 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 1;250:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
4
"Prolonged grief disorder" and "persistent complex bereavement disorder", but not "complicated grief", are one and the same diagnostic entity: an analysis of data from the Yale Bereavement Study.“延长哀伤障碍”与“持续性复杂丧亲障碍”,而非“复杂性哀伤”,是同一诊断实体:来自耶鲁丧亲研究的数据分析
World Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;15(3):266-275. doi: 10.1002/wps.20348.
5
Evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and validity of disturbed grief in DSM-5 and ICD-11.评估 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 中紊乱性悲伤的因子结构、流行率和有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Nov;240:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
6
Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+).DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍和 DSM-5-TR 及 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍的有效测量:创伤后悲伤量表-自我报告加项(TGI-SR+)。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152281. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
7
When does grief become pathological? Evaluation of the ICD-11 diagnostic proposal for prolonged grief in a treatment-seeking sample.悲伤何时会变成病态?对寻求治疗样本中持续性悲伤的《国际疾病分类第11版》诊断建议的评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 8;11(1):1694348. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1694348. eCollection 2020.
8
Trajectories of grief: Comparing symptoms from the DSM-5 and ICD-11 diagnoses.悲伤轨迹:比较 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 诊断的症状。
Depress Anxiety. 2020 Jan;37(1):17-25. doi: 10.1002/da.22902. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
Performance characteristics and clinical utility of diagnostic criteria proposals in bereaved treatment-seeking patients.寻求治疗的丧亲患者诊断标准建议的性能特征和临床效用
Psychol Med. 2017 Mar;47(4):608-615. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002749. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
10
Comparison of six proposed diagnostic criteria sets for disturbed grief.六种针对复杂性哀伤提议的诊断标准集的比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan 13;285:112786. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112786.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence, comorbidities, and factors associated with prolonged grief disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder and complex posttraumatic stress disorder in refugees: a systematic review.难民中持续性悲伤障碍、创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的患病率、共病情况及相关因素:一项系统综述
Confl Health. 2024 Apr 16;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00586-5.
2
ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder Criteria: Turning Challenges Into Opportunities With Multiverse Analyses.《国际疾病分类第11版》持续性悲伤障碍标准:通过多元宇宙分析将挑战转化为机遇
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 7;11:752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00752. eCollection 2020.
3
Valid ICD-11 PGD Scales and Structured Clinical Interviews Needed.
需要有效的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)PGD量表和结构化临床访谈。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 28;11:1120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01120. eCollection 2020.
4
When does grief become pathological? Evaluation of the ICD-11 diagnostic proposal for prolonged grief in a treatment-seeking sample.悲伤何时会变成病态?对寻求治疗样本中持续性悲伤的《国际疾病分类第11版》诊断建议的评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 8;11(1):1694348. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1694348. eCollection 2020.
5
Prolonged Grief Disorder and the Cultural Crisis.持续性悲伤障碍与文化危机
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02982. eCollection 2019.
6
Shame, guilt, and pride after loss: Exploring the relationship between moral emotions and psychopathology in bereaved adults.丧亲后感到羞耻、内疚和自豪:探索道德情感与丧亲成年人精神病理学之间的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Feb 15;263:405-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.164. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Symptoms of prolonged grief, posttraumatic stress, and depression in recently bereaved people: symptom profiles, predictive value, and cognitive behavioural correlates.近期丧亲者的长期悲伤、创伤后应激和抑郁症状:症状特征、预测价值和认知行为相关性。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;55(6):765-777. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01776-w. Epub 2019 Sep 18.