• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
When does grief become pathological? Evaluation of the ICD-11 diagnostic proposal for prolonged grief in a treatment-seeking sample.悲伤何时会变成病态?对寻求治疗样本中持续性悲伤的《国际疾病分类第11版》诊断建议的评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 8;11(1):1694348. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1694348. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparison of DSM-5 criteria for persistent complex bereavement disorder and ICD-11 criteria for prolonged grief disorder in help-seeking bereaved children.寻求帮助的丧亲儿童中 DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准与 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 1;250:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
Evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and validity of disturbed grief in DSM-5 and ICD-11.评估 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 中紊乱性悲伤的因子结构、流行率和有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Nov;240:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
Further evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder and ICD-11 criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder.进一步评估 DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准和 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的因子结构、患病率和同时效度。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+).DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍和 DSM-5-TR 及 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍的有效测量:创伤后悲伤量表-自我报告加项(TGI-SR+)。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152281. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
6
Trajectories of grief: Comparing symptoms from the DSM-5 and ICD-11 diagnoses.悲伤轨迹:比较 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 诊断的症状。
Depress Anxiety. 2020 Jan;37(1):17-25. doi: 10.1002/da.22902. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
"Prolonged grief disorder" and "persistent complex bereavement disorder", but not "complicated grief", are one and the same diagnostic entity: an analysis of data from the Yale Bereavement Study.“延长哀伤障碍”与“持续性复杂丧亲障碍”,而非“复杂性哀伤”,是同一诊断实体:来自耶鲁丧亲研究的数据分析
World Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;15(3):266-275. doi: 10.1002/wps.20348.
8
Comparison of six proposed diagnostic criteria sets for disturbed grief.六种针对复杂性哀伤提议的诊断标准集的比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan 13;285:112786. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112786.
9
The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Clinician Administered: A psychometric evaluation of a new interview for ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR prolonged grief disorder severity and probable caseness.创伤性悲伤量表-临床医生施测版:对一种用于评估国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版修订版(DSM-5-TR)中延长悲伤障碍严重程度及可能病例的新访谈工具的心理测量学评价
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 1;330:188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
10
Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria for pathological grief using a sample of elderly bereaved spouses in Denmark: Perspectives on future bereavement research.使用丹麦老年丧偶配偶样本比较病理性悲伤的拟议诊断标准:对未来丧亲研究的看法。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 15;251:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.056. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder, Physical Health, and Somatic Problems: A Systematic Review.《国际疾病分类第11版》持续性悲伤障碍、身体健康与躯体问题:一项系统综述
Clin Psychol Eur. 2025 Feb 28;7(1):e14351. doi: 10.32872/cpe.14351. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Prolonged grief disorder in an inpatient psychiatric sample: psychometric properties of a new clinical interview and preliminary prevalence.住院精神病患者中的持续性悲伤障碍:新临床访谈的心理测量特性和初步患病率。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 1;24(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05784-2.
3
Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and -5-TR: Challenges and controversies.《ICD-11 与 -5-TR 中的延长哀伤障碍:挑战与争议》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;57(7):944-951. doi: 10.1177/00048674231154206. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
4
Online One-Stop Shop for Disaster Response Services After the MH17 Airplane Crash: An Evaluation Study.在线一站式服务平台助力 MH17 空难应急响应:评估研究
Front Public Health. 2022 May 2;10:832840. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.832840. eCollection 2022.
5
Content overlap analyses of ICD-11 and DSM-5 prolonged grief disorder and prior criteria-sets.ICD-11 和 DSM-5 延长哀伤障碍与先前标准集的内容重叠分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Jan 26;13(1):2011691. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2011691. eCollection 2022.
6
Feasibility of Present-Centered Therapy for Prolonged Grief Disorder: Results of a Pilot Study.以当下为中心疗法治疗持续性悲伤障碍的可行性:一项试点研究的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 15;12:534664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.534664. eCollection 2021.
7
Mental Imagery in Patients with Prolonged Grief Disorder: a Comparison with Matched Bereaved Healthy Controls.持续性创伤后应激障碍患者的意象想象:与匹配的丧亲健康对照组的比较。
Psychiatr Q. 2021 Dec;92(4):1361-1379. doi: 10.1007/s11126-021-09914-x. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
8
ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder Criteria: Turning Challenges Into Opportunities With Multiverse Analyses.《国际疾病分类第11版》持续性悲伤障碍标准:通过多元宇宙分析将挑战转化为机遇
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 7;11:752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00752. eCollection 2020.
9
Web-Based Bereavement Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于网络的哀伤关怀:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 24;11:525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00525. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Prolonged grief disorder among asylum seekers in Germany: the influence of losses and residence status.德国寻求庇护者中的持续性悲伤障碍:损失和居住身份的影响。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Mar 29;10(1):1591330. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1591330. eCollection 2019.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of correlates of prolonged grief disorder in adults exposed to violent loss.对遭受暴力损失的成年人中持续性悲伤障碍相关因素的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Mar 27;10(1):1583524. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1583524. eCollection 2019.
3
Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria for pathological grief using a sample of elderly bereaved spouses in Denmark: Perspectives on future bereavement research.使用丹麦老年丧偶配偶样本比较病理性悲伤的拟议诊断标准:对未来丧亲研究的看法。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 15;251:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.056. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Optimizing the clinical utility of four proposed criteria for a persistent and impairing grief disorder by emphasizing core, rather than associated symptoms.通过强调核心症状而非相关症状,优化四项持续性和致残性悲伤障碍诊断标准的临床实用性。
Psychol Med. 2020 Feb;50(3):438-445. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000254. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
5
Further evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder and ICD-11 criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder.进一步评估 DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准和 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的因子结构、患病率和同时效度。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
6
Disorders specifically associated with stress: A case-controlled field study for ICD-11 mental and behavioural disorders.与压力明确相关的疾病:针对国际疾病分类第11版精神和行为障碍的病例对照现场研究
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016 May-Aug;16(2):109-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
Response to: Prolonged grief disorder for ICD-11: the primacy of clinical utility and international applicability.回应:《国际疾病分类第11版》中的持续性悲伤障碍:临床实用性和国际适用性的首要地位
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Sep 7;9(1):1512249. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1512249. eCollection 2018.
8
Evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and validity of disturbed grief in DSM-5 and ICD-11.评估 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 中紊乱性悲伤的因子结构、流行率和有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Nov;240:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
9
Prolonged grief disorder: clinical utility of ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines.持续性悲伤障碍:ICD-11 诊断指南的临床实用性。
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):861-867. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001563. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
Prolonged grief disorder for ICD-11: the primacy of clinical utility and international applicability.《国际疾病分类第11版》中的持续性悲伤障碍:临床实用性和国际适用性的首要地位。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Jun 6;8(Suppl 6):1476441. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1476441. eCollection 2017.

悲伤何时会变成病态?对寻求治疗样本中持续性悲伤的《国际疾病分类第11版》诊断建议的评估。

When does grief become pathological? Evaluation of the ICD-11 diagnostic proposal for prolonged grief in a treatment-seeking sample.

作者信息

Comtesse Hannah, Vogel Anna, Kersting Anette, Rief Winfried, Steil Regina, Rosner Rita

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 8;11(1):1694348. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1694348. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1080/20008198.2019.1694348
PMID:32002134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6968549/
Abstract

: Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) will be newly included in the ICD-11, while a clinically similar diagnosis, persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD), has already been added to the DSM-5. Only few studies have evaluated these criteria-sets for prolonged grief. : The aim of this study was to evaluate the ICD-11 accessory symptom threshold and compare the diagnostic performance of the two criteria-sets in treatment-seeking bereaved persons. : 113 grief treatment-seeking bereaved persons completed the Interview for Prolonged Grief-13. We used receiver operator characteristic analysis to determine an optimum ICD-11 accessory symptom threshold. We calculated diagnostic rates for PGD and PCBD and examined associations of PGD and PCBD caseness with concurrently assessed psychopathology and prolonged grief symptoms assessed one month later. : An ICD-11 threshold of six accessory symptoms distinguished optimally between interview-diagnosed participants with and without prolonged grief. The prevalence of PGD (69%) was significantly higher than that of PCBD (48%) and of PGD with a 6-symptom threshold (47%). PGD caseness was associated with the relation to the deceased, 6-symptom threshold PGD and PCBD caseness with the time since loss. All criteria-sets were linked to concurrent prolonged grief, depression, and general mental distress. PCBD and 6-symptom threshold PGD but not PGD were associated with prolonged grief severity one month later. : The results support the validity of PGD and PCBD but, at the same time, they provide further support for differing prevalence rates. Using an empirically determined ICD-11 accessory symptom threshold could prevent the pathologisation of grief reactions.

摘要

持续性悲伤障碍(PGD)将被新纳入《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11),而一种临床相似的诊断——持续性复杂丧亲之痛障碍(PCBD)已被添加到《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版》(DSM - 5)中。仅有少数研究评估了这些针对持续性悲伤的标准集。本研究的目的是评估ICD - 11的附加症状阈值,并比较这两种标准集在寻求治疗的丧亲者中的诊断性能。113名寻求悲伤治疗的丧亲者完成了《持续性悲伤访谈 - 13》。我们使用接受者操作特征分析来确定最佳的ICD - 11附加症状阈值。我们计算了PGD和PCBD的诊断率,并检查了PGD和PCBD病例与同时评估的精神病理学以及一个月后评估的持续性悲伤症状之间的关联。ICD - 11的六个附加症状阈值能最佳地区分访谈诊断出的有或没有持续性悲伤的参与者。PGD的患病率(69%)显著高于PCBD的患病率(48%)以及具有六个症状阈值的PGD的患病率(47%)。PGD病例与与逝者的关系有关,具有六个症状阈值时PGD和PCBD病例与丧亲后的时间有关。所有标准集都与同时存在的持续性悲伤、抑郁和一般精神困扰有关。PCBD和具有六个症状阈值的PGD(但不是PGD本身)与一个月后的持续性悲伤严重程度有关。这些结果支持了PGD和PCBD的有效性,但同时也为不同的患病率提供了进一步支持。使用根据经验确定的ICD - 11附加症状阈值可以防止悲伤反应被病理化。