Stelzer Eva-Maria, Zhou Ningning, Maercker Andreas, O'Connor Mary-Frances, Killikelly Clare
Division of Psychopathology and Clinical Intervention, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02982. eCollection 2019.
Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is included as a new mental health disorder in the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Understandably, this has boosted research efforts to investigate this newcomer to psychopathology. However, the use of different diagnostic algorithms has resulted in substantially different prevalence rates both within and across cultural groups. Furthermore, global applicability of the new criteria outside of the Global North has not been yet been established. This perspective presents key findings from Asian research groups and discusses the roadblocks to unified PGD research, including the heterogeneric use of diagnostic algorithms and the lack of cultural compatibility of ICD-11 items. The authors discuss the key issues and address implications for practice.
持续性悲伤障碍（PGD）被纳入《国际疾病分类》（ICD - 11）第11版中的一种新的心理健康障碍。可以理解的是，这推动了对这一心理病理学新成员进行研究的努力。然而，使用不同的诊断算法导致了文化群体内部和不同文化群体之间患病率存在显著差异。此外，全球北方以外地区新标准的全球适用性尚未确立。这一观点展示了亚洲研究小组的主要发现，并讨论了统一PGD研究的障碍，包括诊断算法的异类使用以及ICD - 11项目缺乏文化兼容性。作者们讨论了关键问题并阐述了对实践的影响。
