• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder Criteria: Turning Challenges Into Opportunities With Multiverse Analyses.

作者信息

Eisma Maarten C, Rosner Rita, Comtesse Hannah

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 7;11:752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00752. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00752
PMID:32848929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7427562/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
ICD-11 Prolonged Grief Disorder Criteria: Turning Challenges Into Opportunities With Multiverse Analyses.《国际疾病分类第11版》持续性悲伤障碍标准：通过多元宇宙分析将挑战转化为机遇
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 7;11:752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00752. eCollection 2020.
2
Further evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder and ICD-11 criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder.进一步评估 DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准和 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的因子结构、患病率和同时效度。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
3
Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+).DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍和 DSM-5-TR 及 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍的有效测量：创伤后悲伤量表-自我报告加项（TGI-SR+）。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152281. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
4
Performance of DSM-5 Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder Criteria in a Community Sample of Bereaved Military Family Members.DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准在丧亲的军人家庭成员社区样本中的表现。
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 1;173(9):919-29. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15111442. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
"Prolonged grief disorder" and "persistent complex bereavement disorder", but not "complicated grief", are one and the same diagnostic entity: an analysis of data from the Yale Bereavement Study.“延长哀伤障碍”与“持续性复杂丧亲障碍”，而非“复杂性哀伤”，是同一诊断实体：来自耶鲁丧亲研究的数据分析
World Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;15(3):266-275. doi: 10.1002/wps.20348.
6
Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and -5-TR: Challenges and controversies.《ICD-11 与 -5-TR 中的延长哀伤障碍：挑战与争议》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;57(7):944-951. doi: 10.1177/00048674231154206. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
Comparison of DSM-5 criteria for persistent complex bereavement disorder and ICD-11 criteria for prolonged grief disorder in help-seeking bereaved children.寻求帮助的丧亲儿童中 DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍标准与 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 1;250:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
8
Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria for pathological grief using a sample of elderly bereaved spouses in Denmark: Perspectives on future bereavement research.使用丹麦老年丧偶配偶样本比较病理性悲伤的拟议诊断标准：对未来丧亲研究的看法。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 15;251:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.056. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
The importance of harmonising diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief.协调病理性悲伤诊断标准集的重要性。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;219(3):473-476. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.240.
10
Prolonged grief disorder: clinical utility of ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines.持续性悲伤障碍：ICD-11 诊断指南的临床实用性。
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(5):861-867. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001563. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Grief, bereavement and prolonged grief disorder: scoping and mapping the evidence.悲伤、丧亲之痛与持续性悲伤障碍：证据的范围界定与梳理
BJPsych Open. 2025 Jul 11;11(4):e149. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10050.
2
The prevalence of prolonged grief disorder according to the international classification of diseases 11: a scoping review.根据《国际疾病分类第11版》的持续性悲伤障碍患病率：一项范围综述
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02046-4.
3
Prolonged Grief in Refugees Seeking Treatment for PTSD: Comorbidity with Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Network Structure.寻求创伤后应激障碍治疗的难民中的持续性悲伤：与创伤后应激症状的共病情况及网络结构
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 May-Jun;32(3):e70097. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70097.
4
Psychometric properties of the German version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+).创伤后悲伤量表自我报告附加版（TGI-SR+）德文版的心理测量学特性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2421706. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2421706. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
5
Prevalence and correlates of ICD-11-based prolonged grief disorder in a representative Slovakian sample of recently bereaved adults.在最近丧亲的成年斯洛伐克代表性样本中，基于 ICD-11 的延长哀伤障碍的患病率及其相关因素。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2381368. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2381368. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
6
Prolonged grief disorder symptomology in three African countries: A network analysis and comparison.三个非洲国家的持续性悲伤障碍症状学：一项网络分析与比较
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Apr 29;11:e57. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.54. eCollection 2024.
7
Prolonged grief disorder in an inpatient psychiatric sample: psychometric properties of a new clinical interview and preliminary prevalence.住院精神病患者中的持续性悲伤障碍：新临床访谈的心理测量特性和初步患病率。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 1;24(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05784-2.
8
Editorial: Prolonged grief disorder: vulnerability and resilience.社论：持续性悲伤障碍：脆弱性与恢复力
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 27;15:1387937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1387937. eCollection 2024.
9
Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR: differences in prevalence and diagnostic criteria.《国际疾病分类第11版》和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版修订版》中的持续性悲伤障碍：患病率及诊断标准的差异
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 8;15:1266132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1266132. eCollection 2024.
10
On the Classification and Reporting of Prolonged Grief: Assessment and Research Guidelines.在延长哀伤的分类和报告：评估和研究指南。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2024;32(1):15-32. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000389.

本文引用的文献

1
Upward and Downward Counterfactual Thought After Loss: A Multiwave Controlled Longitudinal Study.失去后的上行和下行反事实思维：一项多波控制纵向研究。
Behav Ther. 2021 May;52(3):577-593. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
Blame, PTSD and DSM-5: an urgent need for clarification.责备、创伤后应激障碍与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版：亟待澄清
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 May 3;9(1):1468709. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1468709.
3
Assessing prolonged grief disorder: A systematic review of assessment instruments.评估持续性悲伤障碍：评估工具的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:420-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.049. Epub 2020 May 23.
4
When does grief become pathological? Evaluation of the ICD-11 diagnostic proposal for prolonged grief in a treatment-seeking sample.悲伤何时会变成病态？对寻求治疗样本中持续性悲伤的《国际疾病分类第11版》诊断建议的评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 8;11(1):1694348. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1694348. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparison of six proposed diagnostic criteria sets for disturbed grief.六种针对复杂性哀伤提议的诊断标准集的比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan 13;285:112786. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112786.
6
Commentary on evidence in support of a grief-related condition as a DSM diagnosis.支持将悲伤相关状况作为 DSM 诊断的证据述评。
Depress Anxiety. 2020 Jan;37(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/da.22985.
7
The importance of harmonising diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief.协调病理性悲伤诊断标准集的重要性。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;219(3):473-476. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.240.
8
Trajectories of grief: Comparing symptoms from the DSM-5 and ICD-11 diagnoses.悲伤轨迹：比较 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 诊断的症状。
Depress Anxiety. 2020 Jan;37(1):17-25. doi: 10.1002/da.22902. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
A Network Approach to Understanding Quality of Life Impairments in Prolonged Grief Disorder.一种理解慢性创伤后应激障碍患者生活质量受损的网络方法。
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Feb;33(1):106-115. doi: 10.1002/jts.22383. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
10
Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria for pathological grief using a sample of elderly bereaved spouses in Denmark: Perspectives on future bereavement research.使用丹麦老年丧偶配偶样本比较病理性悲伤的拟议诊断标准：对未来丧亲研究的看法。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 15;251:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.056. Epub 2019 Mar 18.