Faculty of Social Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):12882-12888. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04657-6. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
Hydropower has come to be treated as synonymous with sustainable economic development by many in the development arena. This is despite the adverse ecological and sociological impacts being widely recognised by those outside of decision-making. The prevalence of this 'hydropower myth' simplifies the complex trade-offs involved within hydropower development and often leads to inequitable situations and ecological damage. The Mekong River is used to demonstrate the strength of the hydropower myth-the disconnect with the social and ecological realities of the basin, and emerging and potential negative consequences. The attractiveness of the hydropower myth to decision-makers and developers is shown to lie largely in its political utility in bolstering national power and legitimacy as well as its ability to channel economic benefits towards states and developers.
在许多发展领域,水力发电被视为可持续经济发展的同义词。尽管决策圈外的人士普遍认识到水力发电的负面影响,但这种“水力发电神话”仍然盛行。这种神话简化了水力发电开发中涉及的复杂权衡,往往导致不公平的情况和生态破坏。湄公河被用来证明水力发电神话的力量——与流域的社会和生态现实脱节,以及正在出现和潜在的负面后果。决策者和开发者之所以被水力发电神话所吸引,主要是因为它在增强国家权力和合法性方面具有政治效用,以及将经济利益输送给国家和开发者的能力。