Rommens Pol Maria, Arand Charlotte, Hofmann Alexander, Wagner Daniel
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Westpfalz-Clinics, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Indian J Orthop. 2019 Jan-Feb;53(1):128-137. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_631_17.
Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are an entity with an increasing frequency. The characteristics of these fractures are different from pelvic ring fractures in younger adults. There is a low energy instead of a high energy trauma mechanism. Due to a specific and consistent decrease of bone mineral density, typical fractures in the anterior and posterior pelvic ring occur. Bilateral sacral ala fractures are frequent. A new classification system distinguishes between four categories with increasing loss of stability. The subtypes represent different localizations of fractures. The primary goal of treatment is restoring mobility and independency. Depending on the amount of instability, conservative or surgical treatment is recommended. The operative technique should be as less invasive as possible. When the broken posterior pelvic ring is fixed operatively, a surgical fixation of the anterior pelvic ring should be considered as well. FFP Type I can be treated conservatively. In many cases, FFP Type II can also be treated conservatively. When conservative treatment fails, percutaneous fixation is performed. FFP Type III and FFP Type IV are treated operatively. The choice of the operation technique is depending on the localization of the fracture. Iliosacral screw osteosynthesis, transsacral bar osteosynthesis, transiliac internal fixation, and iliolumbar fixation are alternatives for stabilization of the posterior pelvic ring. Plate osteosynthesis, retrograde transpubic screw, and anterior internal fixation are alternatives for stabilization of the anterior pelvic ring. Postoperatively, early mobilization, with weight bearing as tolerated, is started. Simultaneously, bone metabolism is also analyzed and its defects compensated. Medical comorbidities should be identified and treated with the help of a multidisciplinary team.
骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)的发生率呈上升趋势。这些骨折的特征与年轻成年人的骨盆环骨折不同。其创伤机制为低能量而非高能量。由于骨密度特定且持续下降,骨盆前环和后环会出现典型骨折。双侧骶骨翼骨折较为常见。一种新的分类系统将其分为四类,稳定性丧失程度逐渐增加。各亚型代表不同的骨折部位。治疗的主要目标是恢复活动能力和独立性。根据不稳定程度,建议采用保守或手术治疗。手术技术应尽可能微创。当手术固定后骨盆环骨折时,也应考虑对前骨盆环进行手术固定。FFP I型可采用保守治疗。在许多情况下,FFP II型也可采用保守治疗。保守治疗失败时,进行经皮固定。FFP III型和FFP IV型采用手术治疗。手术技术的选择取决于骨折部位。髂骶螺钉接骨术、经骶骨棒接骨术、经髂内固定术和髂腰固定术是稳定后骨盆环的替代方法。钢板接骨术、逆行耻骨螺钉和前内固定术是稳定前骨盆环的替代方法。术后,尽早开始可耐受负重的早期活动。同时,分析骨代谢情况并弥补其缺陷。应识别内科合并症,并在多学科团队的帮助下进行治疗。