Ansari Arya
University of Virginia.
J Educ Psychol. 2018 Oct;110(7):952-973. doi: 10.1037/edu0000255. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
Using data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Cohort of 1998 ( = 15,070), this study used propensity scores to examine the short- and long-term academic and psychosocial benefits of preschool education for a diverse sample of middle-class children. Compared with children who attended informal care at age 4, preschool attendees consistently performed better on achievement tests from age 5 through early adolescence, but exhibited less optimal psychosocial skills. These negative behavioral effects of preschool were concentrated among children who attended preschool for 20 or more hours per week, but otherwise, there was little evidence of heterogeneity as a function of program type or child- and family-characteristics. The long-term academic advantages of preschool were, however, largely explained by their positive effects on academic skills early in formal schooling and there was evidence for convergence in children's academic test scores, which was partially attributed to the differences in children's social skills during the early elementary school years.
本研究利用1998年幼儿纵向研究幼儿园队列(样本量 = 15,070)的数据,运用倾向得分法,探讨了学前教育对不同类型中产阶级儿童的短期和长期学业及心理社会益处。与4岁时接受非正式照料的儿童相比,上过学前班的儿童在5岁至青春期早期的成绩测试中表现始终更好,但心理社会技能却不太理想。学前班的这些负面行为影响集中在每周上学前班20小时或更长时间的儿童中,不过,几乎没有证据表明存在因课程类型或儿童及家庭特征而异的异质性。然而,学前班的长期学业优势很大程度上可归因于其对正规学校教育早期学业技能的积极影响,并且有证据表明儿童的学业测试成绩趋同,这部分归因于小学早期儿童社交技能的差异。