Bailey Drew, Duncan Greg J, Odgers Candice L, Yu Winnie
University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Res Educ Eff. 2017;10(1):7-39. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2016.1232459. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
Many interventions targeting cognitive skills or socioemotional skills and behaviors demonstrate initially promising but then quickly disappearing impacts. Our paper seeks to identify the key features of interventions, as well as the characteristics and environments of the children and adolescents who participate in them, that can be expected to sustain persistently beneficial program impacts. We describe three such processes: skill-building, foot-in-the-door and sustaining environments. We argue that skill-building interventions should target "trifecta" skills - ones that are malleable, fundamental, and would not have developed eventually in the absence of the intervention. Successful foot-in-the-door interventions equip a child with the right skills or capacities at the right time to avoid imminent risks (e.g., grade failure or teen drinking) or seize emerging opportunities (e.g., entry into honors classes). The sustaining environments perspective views high quality of environments subsequent to the completion of the intervention as crucial for sustaining early skill gains. These three perspectives generate both complementary and competing hypotheses regarding the nature, timing and targeting of interventions that generate enduring impacts.
许多针对认知技能或社会情感技能及行为的干预措施,起初显示出很有前景的效果,但随后影响很快就消失了。我们的论文旨在确定干预措施的关键特征,以及参与这些干预措施的儿童和青少年的特点及环境,这些因素有望使项目的有益影响持续存在。我们描述了三个这样的过程:技能培养、循序渐进策略和维持性环境。我们认为,技能培养干预措施应针对“三合一”技能——即具有可塑性、基础性,且在没有干预的情况下最终不会得到发展的技能。成功的循序渐进策略干预措施会在适当的时候为孩子提供正确的技能或能力,以避免迫在眉睫的风险(如成绩不及格或青少年饮酒)或抓住新出现的机会(如进入荣誉课程)。维持性环境观点认为,干预措施结束后的高质量环境对于维持早期获得的技能至关重要。这三个观点就产生持久影响的干预措施的性质、时机和目标提出了互补且相互竞争的假设。